San Ramon’s Golden Skate roller rink no longer has a firm closing date, following an uptick in attendance and community support for the facility, and delays with permitting and development for a townhouse project for the site.
The rink’s staff had initially announced July 31 as the final day of operations, but confirmed that the closing date has been rescinded as of Tuesday, and that the rink would remain open.
The latest plot twist in the story of the rink’s closure comes roughly nine months after an announcement last October that the rink would be ceasing operations, citing financial hardships caused by the pandemic and the inability to restore losses after reopening in the spring of 2021.
However, a preliminary application for the housing project to replace the rink had been submitted more than a year prior, in August 2020, and was already under review last summer, according to city records.
The 47-unit Windflower Fields Townhomes project was approved by the San Ramon Planning Commission last December. The construction date is still to be determined, according to an annual update presented by the Planning Commission to the City Council this month. In the commission’s July 2021 presentation, Windflower Fields was listed as “under review.”
The housing development on the property at 2701 Hooper Drive would require demolishing the rink, which the owner, Hassan Sharifi, first bought in 1995.
“It took me many years to revive the business. Unfortunately, the enormous financial damages that we suffered due to COVID have made the continued operation of the Golden Skate infeasible and so it is with a great deal of sadness that I must announce that The Golden Skate will cease its operations,” Sharifi said.
The initial news and the recent announcement of the since-revoked closing date, followed by broadcast news reports and social media circulation, garnered hundreds of reactions and comments online as people reminisced about birthday parties, first dates, and first jobs at the rink over the years, and made plans for their final visits.
Although some expressed surprise at the announcement, amid the unexpected resurgence of interest in roller skating in recent years, and popularity of ’80s and ’90s nostalgia, it appeared to be largely accepted as one more inevitable pandemic casualty, among a wave of others in recent years.
The Windflower Fields project came to the Planning Commission for a final hearing and vote approximately six weeks later, on Dec. 6. The meeting saw just one public comment regarding the closure of the Golden Skate, from Margie Gear.
“I think it’s important … (to know) that there are people who do object to it, and the reason why there’s been a large outpouring of sadness,” Gear said. “There aren’t many roller rinks left. I know that this one has been around for almost 50 years, and I think it’s important for someone to speak up and say this has been great for the kids; it’s been great for generations.”
Gear noted that the Golden Skate has been one of the few remaining roller rinks in Northern California, which allow “kids … and adults, old kids like myself, to have a forum to have a wholesome place to skate.” In particular, she pointed to the sense of community at the San Ramon rink, which includes longtime professional skaters.
“There’s so much sadness. I know people in their 70s and 80s who are competing professionally with … the Roller Skaters Association, and it’s really — there is a whole lot of grief right now,” Gear said.
“It’s like it was once said in a song from about the time this roller rink was built,” Gear added. “They paved paradise and put up a parking lot. I think that’s what’s happening here”
Another unidentified speaker expressed support for the project in a public comment that night, despite noting that she was usually critical of projects coming before the commission. Dylan Casey also submitted a written comment to the commission ahead of the meeting, urging approval and development of the project on behalf of the California Renters Legal Advocacy and Education Fund.
Bryan Wenter, the applicant’s legal counsel, sought to highlight benefits of the project in a presentation to the commission.
“The project is in its own right a great project, which I think is also reflected in the fact that there is no public opposition to it,” Wenter said. “And in addition it’s a project that … is basically not visible from San Ramon Valley Boulevard or other public vantage points, versus the higher density project that could be accomplished consistent with the existing city land-use regulations, which could be much more dense, much more visible, etcetera.”
“So we believe this is a great project in its own right, in addition to the fact that it’s supported and protected by state housing law,” Wenter added.
Despite ultimately voting in favor of the project that night, commissioners expressed a wide range of concerns and reservations during their discussion of the item.
“This is not a good project,” Commissioner Gary Alpert said. “I will vote yes because under state law I don’t think we have a choice. Yes, the project meets all state laws and is consistent with the outdated and now replaced Crow Canyon Specific Plan. Everyone that worked on that plan knew it was obsolete and needed to be revised. We attempted to remove housing, we isolated an industrial corner of the plan area and were unsuccessful due to state law.”
“As written in the staff report, it is not easy or even possible to deny this project without putting the city in great jeopardy,” Alpert added.
Despite state housing law — namely Senate Bill 330 — that imposes restrictions on local officials’ ability to deny applications for housing that don’t pose objective health, safety or environmental concerns, Commissioner Corie Edwards said that language in the Crow Canyon Specific Plan and resolution would classify the proposed ADUs (accessory dwelling units) as fourth bedrooms, rather than individual units.
Edwards, along with Alpert, noted that their dislike of the project before them was not a matter of being anti-development.
“I would like very much to see this site developed,” Edwards said. “I invite the project sponsor to put forth a project that complies with San Ramon’s planning documents and California law, and I hope this project’s sponsor will do that irrespective of the outcome of tonight’s hearing.”
Commissioner Rick Marks said that while he would vote in favor of the project, he wanted the record to show his concerns with it, including at the planning level.
“People will not be living in a neighborhood; they’ll be living in a single isolated housing development,” Marks said.
Commission Chair Jean Kuznik also noted that applicants for other projects on properties of a similar size had been able to put forth projects that incorporated affordable housing in a substantial way, in contrast with this one.
“This was not a question of could it be done,” Kuznik said. “This was a question of they wouldn’t do it. And I find that very troubling, and again disappointing.”
Commissioners reluctantly passed the resolution at a vote of 4-0, with Edwards abstaining.
The vote came less than a year after the rink’s doors had been reopened last spring, which was just over a year after it was forced to cease operations in March 2020.
The Golden Skate is set to remain open indefinitely as the permitting and development process for Windflower Fields Townhomes continues.
