News

Pleasanton considering three years of water rate increases, starting at 30% hike in November

Initial council meeting to be held at Operations Services Center on Tuesday, instead of city hall

Water runs out of a household faucet in Pleasanton. (File photo by Chuck Deckert)

The Pleasanton City Council is set for an initial discussion on proposed increases to the city's water rates, starting at 30% on Nov. 1, during a special meeting Tuesday night.

The public meeting will be held at the city's Operations Services Center on Busch Road instead of the usual council chambers at the Pleasanton Civic Center.

"Recognizing that water supply and quality are of primary importance to the community, the city is proposing bold action to ensure the continued delivery of safe, reliable drinking water by immediately funding critical water system improvements," City Manager Gerry Beaudin said in a press release last week.

"Specifically, revenues from increased rates will fund a project to increase capacity from Zone 7 Water Agency to reduce the reliance on Pleasanton's groundwater wells as a longer-term solution is developed," Beaudin added.

The recommendation from staff would represent the first overhaul of city water service rates since 2011, in the form of a 30% increase this year, followed by another 20% increase beginning Jan. 1, 2025 and a 12% increase the following year.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

According to the staff report, single-family residential customers would see an average increase of about $33 every other month during the first year, depending on their bimonthly water consumption.

The option to raise the water rates is not something that is new to the city as it had previously planned to raise them back in 2019. At the time, city staff were planning to conduct a water rate study but due to the pandemic, they had to put a pause on the study.

Prior to that, the City Council had approved water and sewer rates to increase annually in 2015 based on inflation without accounting for the city's population growth. When the city also found PFAS chemicals, otherwise known as forever chemicals, in its groundwater wells, it forced the city to relook at its water rates in order to fund future projects to address those chemicals.

"The proposed increase incorporates the inflation of operations and maintenance costs, and additional costs based on the resources necessary to implement critical near-term system infrastructure improvements and to advance the selected water supply alternative and other prioritized water projects," the staff report states.

Recent droughts and mandatory water conservation has also led to a decrease in the city's water enterprise fund, which is separate from the city's general fund in that it is intended to be self-funded through water sales.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

Because of that, these water rate increases would also help the city in being fiscally able to develop plans to treat or replace the water from the groundwater wells, according to city officials.

The announcement of the proposed new water rates also comes a month after the council approved the city's two-year operating budget and four-year capital improvement program, which drew public and council criticism in part about why the city wasn't allocating more money toward the water enterprise fund.

According to Heather Tiernan, communications manager for the city, staff have considered how the 30% increase will affect the budget.

"At the time the budget was adopted, we estimated increases of 14.9% for the full 2024 fiscal year, which equals about 19.9% for the portion of the year the proposed rate increase includes," Tiernan told the Weekly. "It is common for water and recycled water rates to adjust during the fiscal year and as the budget is a planning tool, the city will make any necessary refinements at the midyear budget check-in with the City Council."

She also argued that the city, as many public commenters requested during past council meetings, cannot simply allocate restricted money from other areas of the city's general fund budget to the water enterprise fund -- even though the city has transferred unrestricted money from its general fund to enterprise funds such water and cemetery in the past.

"The city's water enterprise fund is a self-supporting government fund that provides goods and services to the public for a fee," she said. "Enterprise funds are operated separately from the city's operations that are funded by the general fund. We have operated outside of this policy for several years, but to continue to do so is unsustainable."

While enterprise funds can only be used for its stated purpose and can't be transferred back to the general fund, unrestricted general fund money can and has been transferred to enterprise funds in various occasions, one example recently being when the city transferred money from the general fund to the cemetery enterprise fund when the January atmospheric river storms caused damage and cleanup couldn't be covered by what was in the cemetery enterprise fund.

Another example is the 20% senior and 30% low-income discounts for water bills that are covered by money that is transferred from the city's general fund to the water enterprise fund.

However, Tiernan said that it is now the city's goal to "increase revenue for the water enterprise fund to avoid transferring money from our general fund to subsidize regular operations and maintenance."

As for the funding for discounts for seniors and low-income ratepayers, she said that "the general fund will continue to cover that cost and it is not anticipated to have significant increased effects on the general fund budget."

Another important factor in the city's water funds that she highlighted -- which was also brought up in the staff report -- was that the city will be looking to use an array of different funding sources including state and federal funds as well as money obtained from a worldwide class action lawsuit against 3M Co., a chemical manufacturing company that has been linked to making products that contain PFAS, which have contaminated water suppliers across the U.S.

"As the city works to address both water supply and quality, it is important to note that the presence of PFAS is not isolated to Pleasanton, the Tri-Valley region, or California," Beaudin said in the July 13 press release. "A recently released study by the U.S. Geological Survey shows that 45% of the drinking water provided from private wells and public supplies across the country indicates evidence of PFAS contaminants."

If the council advances the proposed water rates on Tuesday, a rate-setting process will begin with public notices to the community. A public hearing will then be held on Sept. 19 so that the community can provide feedback and the council can make a final decision about whether to approve the rate proposal.

According to Tiernan, the city will also continue to work on assessing the city's different water supply options and in September, "city staff plans to present a preferred alternative to address Pleasanton's water needs."

The council meeting is scheduled to start at 7 p.m. Tuesday (July 18) in the Remillard Conference Room at the city's Operations Services Center at 3333 Busch Road in Pleasanton. The full agenda can be accessed here.

In other business

* City staff will be looking to the council to approve and adopt the city's updated Economic Development Strategic Plan, which includes plans to strengthen five priority areas for economic development activities in Pleasanton over the next five years.

Last August, staff began to update the city's existing Economic Development Strategic Plan, which was adopted in 2013, in order to better reflect changing economic conditions that came out of the pandemic.

According to the staff report, an analysis of the strategic plan -- which looked at demographics, economic, business, fiscal and market conditions -- identified the strengths and opportunities for economic development in Pleasanton.

"The principal section of the strategic plan defines five priority areas for economic development activities in Pleasanton over the next five years," the staff report states. "Each priority includes programs and services with key initiatives and implementation actions tied to a proposed timeframe for implementation over the next five years."

The five priority areas include: economic development organizational capacity building; business retention, expansion and attraction; local revenue growth; entrepreneurship and innovation outreach; and major projects accelerator.

* The council will be receiving a presentation on the city's 2023 community survey report, which outlines resident's satisfaction with city services and quality of life.

The survey, which was done by Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin, Metz and Associates (FM3 Research), was conducted from May 24 to June 7 through phone and online interviews.

"The survey provides baseline data in multiple areas, which includes quality of life, safety, customer services, and attitudes toward funding measure concepts; the results demonstrated that city residents remain very satisfied with the quality of life in Pleasanton, again producing some of the highest ratings in the surrounding area," the staff report states.

Some notable survey results include 91% of residents saying the quality of life in Pleasanton is excellent or good; 93% of them saying they feel safe -- although 21% said crime is their most serious concern -- and 78% of them saying the city's service provision is excellent or good.

Some top priorities also include housing costs, traffic, water quality, street maintenance, 911 response and programs for youth and seniors.

* During the consent calendar, which are items that are routine in nature and are typically approved without discussion, the council will be voting on a second reading and adoption of an ordinance that would allow all classes of e-bikes on trails and pathways in parks and in recreation facilities in Pleasanton.

The ordinance will subject all of the e-bikes to a 15 miles per hour maximum speed limit to ensure safety, according to the staff report.

Currently, the city of Pleasanton's municipal code prohibits motorized bicycles in park and recreation facilities -- which include the city's trails. But in 2022 Assembly Bill 1909 was approved, which removes the prohibition on e-bikes on trails and pathways and allows local jurisdictions to adopt their own e-bike regulations.

The council had previously discussed the ordinance during its first reading at the June 20 meeting where Mayor Karla Brown voted against the ordinance citing safety concerns.

* The council will be set to adopt a resolution to approve a memorandum of understanding (MOU) agreement with the Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department's newly recognized battalion chiefs union and the LPFD's Joint Powers Authority.

On July 18, 2022, the International Association of Firefighters Local 1974, Battalion Chiefs Unit (IAFF) was formally recognized as a union representing seven LPFD battalion chiefs. Since then, the union has met with representatives from both Livermore and Pleasanton 10 times before reaching consensus on a tentative agreement to raise salaries and benefits for the next two years.

The terms of the agreement -- which would end June 30, 2025 -- includes 3% wage increases in this year and in 2024 as well as a 1% increase in 2025.

The agreement also includes establishing salary ranges; one-time payments equal to $4,000; increasing the training premium pay from 15% to 25%; increase and expanding the Battalion Chief Coverage Stipend; allowing battalion chiefs to fill fire captain vacancies when needed; a uniform allowance; vacation accumulation and scheduling; and long term disability pay.

* City staff will be seeking the council's approval to award a contract for the construction of Pleasanton's first dedicated cricket field at the Ken Mercer Sports Park.

The project will aim to convert one of the existing hardball fields at the park into an oval grass field approximately 360 feet wide by 390 feet long, including a 90-foot-by-10-foot synthetic turf cricket pitch in the center of the oval, according to the staff report.

Staff will be looking to award the construction contract to ELLA, a construction company based in Alamo, in the amount of $414,430. The goal will be to begin construction in the fall during the regularly scheduled closure of the fields.

According to the staff report, the city has allocated $550,000 toward the project including a $42,000 in project contingency and $29,143 for design services and advertising.

* Prior to the special council meeting, the dais will convene for a closed session discussion on cybersecurity efforts in the city's information technology department.

According to Tiernan, the discussion "is not in response to an incident or event, but a proactive conversation" regarding cybersecurity.

The closed session meeting will be held at the city manager's conference room at 6 p.m.

A front row seat to local high school sports.

Check out our new newsletter, the Playbook.

Christian Trujano
 
Christian Trujano, a Bay Area native and San Jose State alum, joined Embarcadero Media in May 2022 following his graduation. He is an award-winning student journalist who has covered stories in San Jose ranging from crime to higher education. Read more >>

Follow PleasantonWeekly.com and the Pleasanton Weekly on Twitter @pleasantonnews, Facebook and on Instagram @pleasantonweekly for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Stay informed on important city government news. Sign up for our FREE daily Express newsletter.

Pleasanton considering three years of water rate increases, starting at 30% hike in November

Initial council meeting to be held at Operations Services Center on Tuesday, instead of city hall

by / Pleasanton Weekly

Uploaded: Mon, Jul 17, 2023, 2:02 pm
Updated: Mon, Jul 17, 2023, 5:12 pm

The Pleasanton City Council is set for an initial discussion on proposed increases to the city's water rates, starting at 30% on Nov. 1, during a special meeting Tuesday night.

The public meeting will be held at the city's Operations Services Center on Busch Road instead of the usual council chambers at the Pleasanton Civic Center.

"Recognizing that water supply and quality are of primary importance to the community, the city is proposing bold action to ensure the continued delivery of safe, reliable drinking water by immediately funding critical water system improvements," City Manager Gerry Beaudin said in a press release last week.

"Specifically, revenues from increased rates will fund a project to increase capacity from Zone 7 Water Agency to reduce the reliance on Pleasanton's groundwater wells as a longer-term solution is developed," Beaudin added.

The recommendation from staff would represent the first overhaul of city water service rates since 2011, in the form of a 30% increase this year, followed by another 20% increase beginning Jan. 1, 2025 and a 12% increase the following year.

According to the staff report, single-family residential customers would see an average increase of about $33 every other month during the first year, depending on their bimonthly water consumption.

The option to raise the water rates is not something that is new to the city as it had previously planned to raise them back in 2019. At the time, city staff were planning to conduct a water rate study but due to the pandemic, they had to put a pause on the study.

Prior to that, the City Council had approved water and sewer rates to increase annually in 2015 based on inflation without accounting for the city's population growth. When the city also found PFAS chemicals, otherwise known as forever chemicals, in its groundwater wells, it forced the city to relook at its water rates in order to fund future projects to address those chemicals.

"The proposed increase incorporates the inflation of operations and maintenance costs, and additional costs based on the resources necessary to implement critical near-term system infrastructure improvements and to advance the selected water supply alternative and other prioritized water projects," the staff report states.

Recent droughts and mandatory water conservation has also led to a decrease in the city's water enterprise fund, which is separate from the city's general fund in that it is intended to be self-funded through water sales.

Because of that, these water rate increases would also help the city in being fiscally able to develop plans to treat or replace the water from the groundwater wells, according to city officials.

The announcement of the proposed new water rates also comes a month after the council approved the city's two-year operating budget and four-year capital improvement program, which drew public and council criticism in part about why the city wasn't allocating more money toward the water enterprise fund.

According to Heather Tiernan, communications manager for the city, staff have considered how the 30% increase will affect the budget.

"At the time the budget was adopted, we estimated increases of 14.9% for the full 2024 fiscal year, which equals about 19.9% for the portion of the year the proposed rate increase includes," Tiernan told the Weekly. "It is common for water and recycled water rates to adjust during the fiscal year and as the budget is a planning tool, the city will make any necessary refinements at the midyear budget check-in with the City Council."

She also argued that the city, as many public commenters requested during past council meetings, cannot simply allocate restricted money from other areas of the city's general fund budget to the water enterprise fund -- even though the city has transferred unrestricted money from its general fund to enterprise funds such water and cemetery in the past.

"The city's water enterprise fund is a self-supporting government fund that provides goods and services to the public for a fee," she said. "Enterprise funds are operated separately from the city's operations that are funded by the general fund. We have operated outside of this policy for several years, but to continue to do so is unsustainable."

While enterprise funds can only be used for its stated purpose and can't be transferred back to the general fund, unrestricted general fund money can and has been transferred to enterprise funds in various occasions, one example recently being when the city transferred money from the general fund to the cemetery enterprise fund when the January atmospheric river storms caused damage and cleanup couldn't be covered by what was in the cemetery enterprise fund.

Another example is the 20% senior and 30% low-income discounts for water bills that are covered by money that is transferred from the city's general fund to the water enterprise fund.

However, Tiernan said that it is now the city's goal to "increase revenue for the water enterprise fund to avoid transferring money from our general fund to subsidize regular operations and maintenance."

As for the funding for discounts for seniors and low-income ratepayers, she said that "the general fund will continue to cover that cost and it is not anticipated to have significant increased effects on the general fund budget."

Another important factor in the city's water funds that she highlighted -- which was also brought up in the staff report -- was that the city will be looking to use an array of different funding sources including state and federal funds as well as money obtained from a worldwide class action lawsuit against 3M Co., a chemical manufacturing company that has been linked to making products that contain PFAS, which have contaminated water suppliers across the U.S.

"As the city works to address both water supply and quality, it is important to note that the presence of PFAS is not isolated to Pleasanton, the Tri-Valley region, or California," Beaudin said in the July 13 press release. "A recently released study by the U.S. Geological Survey shows that 45% of the drinking water provided from private wells and public supplies across the country indicates evidence of PFAS contaminants."

If the council advances the proposed water rates on Tuesday, a rate-setting process will begin with public notices to the community. A public hearing will then be held on Sept. 19 so that the community can provide feedback and the council can make a final decision about whether to approve the rate proposal.

According to Tiernan, the city will also continue to work on assessing the city's different water supply options and in September, "city staff plans to present a preferred alternative to address Pleasanton's water needs."

The council meeting is scheduled to start at 7 p.m. Tuesday (July 18) in the Remillard Conference Room at the city's Operations Services Center at 3333 Busch Road in Pleasanton. The full agenda can be accessed here.

In other business

* City staff will be looking to the council to approve and adopt the city's updated Economic Development Strategic Plan, which includes plans to strengthen five priority areas for economic development activities in Pleasanton over the next five years.

Last August, staff began to update the city's existing Economic Development Strategic Plan, which was adopted in 2013, in order to better reflect changing economic conditions that came out of the pandemic.

According to the staff report, an analysis of the strategic plan -- which looked at demographics, economic, business, fiscal and market conditions -- identified the strengths and opportunities for economic development in Pleasanton.

"The principal section of the strategic plan defines five priority areas for economic development activities in Pleasanton over the next five years," the staff report states. "Each priority includes programs and services with key initiatives and implementation actions tied to a proposed timeframe for implementation over the next five years."

The five priority areas include: economic development organizational capacity building; business retention, expansion and attraction; local revenue growth; entrepreneurship and innovation outreach; and major projects accelerator.

* The council will be receiving a presentation on the city's 2023 community survey report, which outlines resident's satisfaction with city services and quality of life.

The survey, which was done by Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin, Metz and Associates (FM3 Research), was conducted from May 24 to June 7 through phone and online interviews.

"The survey provides baseline data in multiple areas, which includes quality of life, safety, customer services, and attitudes toward funding measure concepts; the results demonstrated that city residents remain very satisfied with the quality of life in Pleasanton, again producing some of the highest ratings in the surrounding area," the staff report states.

Some notable survey results include 91% of residents saying the quality of life in Pleasanton is excellent or good; 93% of them saying they feel safe -- although 21% said crime is their most serious concern -- and 78% of them saying the city's service provision is excellent or good.

Some top priorities also include housing costs, traffic, water quality, street maintenance, 911 response and programs for youth and seniors.

* During the consent calendar, which are items that are routine in nature and are typically approved without discussion, the council will be voting on a second reading and adoption of an ordinance that would allow all classes of e-bikes on trails and pathways in parks and in recreation facilities in Pleasanton.

The ordinance will subject all of the e-bikes to a 15 miles per hour maximum speed limit to ensure safety, according to the staff report.

Currently, the city of Pleasanton's municipal code prohibits motorized bicycles in park and recreation facilities -- which include the city's trails. But in 2022 Assembly Bill 1909 was approved, which removes the prohibition on e-bikes on trails and pathways and allows local jurisdictions to adopt their own e-bike regulations.

The council had previously discussed the ordinance during its first reading at the June 20 meeting where Mayor Karla Brown voted against the ordinance citing safety concerns.

* The council will be set to adopt a resolution to approve a memorandum of understanding (MOU) agreement with the Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department's newly recognized battalion chiefs union and the LPFD's Joint Powers Authority.

On July 18, 2022, the International Association of Firefighters Local 1974, Battalion Chiefs Unit (IAFF) was formally recognized as a union representing seven LPFD battalion chiefs. Since then, the union has met with representatives from both Livermore and Pleasanton 10 times before reaching consensus on a tentative agreement to raise salaries and benefits for the next two years.

The terms of the agreement -- which would end June 30, 2025 -- includes 3% wage increases in this year and in 2024 as well as a 1% increase in 2025.

The agreement also includes establishing salary ranges; one-time payments equal to $4,000; increasing the training premium pay from 15% to 25%; increase and expanding the Battalion Chief Coverage Stipend; allowing battalion chiefs to fill fire captain vacancies when needed; a uniform allowance; vacation accumulation and scheduling; and long term disability pay.

* City staff will be seeking the council's approval to award a contract for the construction of Pleasanton's first dedicated cricket field at the Ken Mercer Sports Park.

The project will aim to convert one of the existing hardball fields at the park into an oval grass field approximately 360 feet wide by 390 feet long, including a 90-foot-by-10-foot synthetic turf cricket pitch in the center of the oval, according to the staff report.

Staff will be looking to award the construction contract to ELLA, a construction company based in Alamo, in the amount of $414,430. The goal will be to begin construction in the fall during the regularly scheduled closure of the fields.

According to the staff report, the city has allocated $550,000 toward the project including a $42,000 in project contingency and $29,143 for design services and advertising.

* Prior to the special council meeting, the dais will convene for a closed session discussion on cybersecurity efforts in the city's information technology department.

According to Tiernan, the discussion "is not in response to an incident or event, but a proactive conversation" regarding cybersecurity.

The closed session meeting will be held at the city manager's conference room at 6 p.m.

Comments

Long Time Pleasanton Resident
Registered user
Mohr Park
on Jul 17, 2023 at 2:39 pm
Long Time Pleasanton Resident, Mohr Park
Registered user
on Jul 17, 2023 at 2:39 pm

Wow! By Jan 2026, a short period of 2.5 years, the water rate will go up by whopping 86%, almost 100% increase. This is before they start increasing other rates like sewer rates, EBMUD or Zone 7 charges. If 3M is going to be held accountable for the PFAS mess, we the citizens should not foot any of the costs now. Lastly, I appears we the consumers are being held hostage. If we use more water, we get to pay higher rates. However in the case of a drought, we also pay righer rates in addition to penalties [!!!] Because the water department didn't college enough funds to keep their operations running. This is a good scam.. no matter what, the water department gets to increase their budget.


MsVic
Registered user
Mission Park
on Jul 17, 2023 at 2:53 pm
MsVic, Mission Park
Registered user
on Jul 17, 2023 at 2:53 pm

Do the math - over 3 years this is a 57% increase. On 100.00 today (example only) you’d be paying 174.00 in 2026. That’s insane. Our council majority of 4 is so fiscally irresponsible, how do they expect seniors on fixed incomes to pay an additional 57%? There is no cost of living increase that will touch this increase. Time for 4 people on our council to realize we are not going to allow them to shirk their fiduciary responsibilities to the residents of Pleasanton and act irresponsibly. Wasted money on a skate park improvement, wasted money on century house. They can’t or won’t even respond to a request for an ROI on the investment in the century house. 40+ days our Police Officers are working without a contract. Pleasanton residents elections have consequences and soon your pocketbook.


MsVic
Registered user
Mission Park
on Jul 17, 2023 at 2:56 pm
MsVic, Mission Park
Registered user
on Jul 17, 2023 at 2:56 pm

As a follow up how can the council even determine what rate increases should go into effect when they don’t even have the recommendation from the expensive consultants they hired to study the PFAS situation.

“According to Tiernan, the city will also continue to work on assessing the city's different water supply options and in September, "city staff plans to present a preferred alternative to address Pleasanton’s water needs.”


Swagu
Registered user
Avila
on Jul 17, 2023 at 3:06 pm
Swagu, Avila
Registered user
on Jul 17, 2023 at 3:06 pm

Nothing like charging big $ for a basic human necessity. At least homes in the area aren't 7 figures!

No wonder working class and upstarts are leaving California in droves.


Willy
Registered user
Old Towne
on Jul 17, 2023 at 3:17 pm
Willy, Old Towne
Registered user
on Jul 17, 2023 at 3:17 pm

The rate increase is insane. Don't forget many have to have a home filtering system and soft water tanks to handle the water the City and Zone 7 supply. Our City council is totally incompetent and needs to be replace with people that understand the problems that the City has and handle them accordingly. 1ST AND FOREMOST GIVE THE POLICE THE MONEY THEY NEED TO RUN A 1ST CLASS OPERATION!


Mike Hosterman
Registered user
Vintage Hills
on Jul 17, 2023 at 3:31 pm
Mike Hosterman, Vintage Hills
Registered user
on Jul 17, 2023 at 3:31 pm

Shouldn't we wait to see how much the city will receive for the 3M settlement before we start the discussion about raising the water rates? Will the meeting be televised?


MsVic
Registered user
Mission Park
on Jul 17, 2023 at 3:46 pm
MsVic, Mission Park
Registered user
on Jul 17, 2023 at 3:46 pm

Mike - according to web site meeting will be on zoom or in person at operations center (not city hall).


Kathleen Ruegsegger
Registered user
Vintage Hills
on Jul 17, 2023 at 3:58 pm
Kathleen Ruegsegger, Vintage Hills
Registered user
on Jul 17, 2023 at 3:58 pm

Salaries of city employees: Web Link


Michael Austin
Registered user
Pleasanton Meadows
on Jul 17, 2023 at 4:39 pm
Michael Austin , Pleasanton Meadows
Registered user
on Jul 17, 2023 at 4:39 pm

3M and PFAS:

Japan has produced PFAS for 100 years. Sumitomo Bakelite, Fuji Film, among the leaders. 3 M was founded in 1902, Kodak was founded in 1893. Why is 3M carrying the load?

All those other companies produced PFAS in far greater volumes than 3M. The microchip came along in 1958, it changed everything. it required more Monomer to deliver devices. Devices required a delivery system, which was carrier tape. Carrier tape is Polymer.

Monomer is reacted in fluidized reactors to produce Polymer. A million pounds of Monomer was reacted every day for years, (conservative estimate) When cell phones came along, the demand for Polymer increased again.

Each cell phone today has more than 250 capacitors. Those capacitors require a delivery system, Polymer carrier tape. The high-speed tape & reel machines, because of the static, would discharge, (fling out) the capacitor. To prevent that, a lead coating was developed to coat the carrier tape. There are tons of PFAS in our environment today coated with lead.


Just Another Resident
Registered user
Pleasanton Valley
on Jul 17, 2023 at 5:02 pm
Just Another Resident, Pleasanton Valley
Registered user
on Jul 17, 2023 at 5:02 pm

So interesting that $$ could be "found" for the skate park and the Century House, which only impact a few residents (donors?), but not this, which impacts all residents in the midst of inflation.

When is the recall??


MsVic
Registered user
Mission Park
on Jul 17, 2023 at 6:03 pm
MsVic, Mission Park
Registered user
on Jul 17, 2023 at 6:03 pm

Time to get tv news media involved, I sent this story to KTVU. Suggested they look into the 57% rate increase over three years. Suggested they look at the 40 plus days with no contract for our PD. Mentioned the lack of roi for a 4 million investment in century house. Told them about the 6 million spend on a skate park used by very few. I hope they do a tv news story. And I sure hope voters remember this!


MichaelB
Registered user
Pleasanton Meadows
on Jul 17, 2023 at 7:31 pm
MichaelB, Pleasanton Meadows
Registered user
on Jul 17, 2023 at 7:31 pm

"Nothing like charging big $ for a basic human necessity."


Standard operating procedure for so called progressives. Everything you earn/invest/save belongs to the "community" to be shared/spent accordingly - until there is "fairness" and "income equality."


Pton Resident
Registered user
Foothill High School
on Jul 18, 2023 at 4:53 am
Pton Resident, Foothill High School
Registered user
on Jul 18, 2023 at 4:53 am

I'm no math genius, but 30 + 20 + 12 = 62 percent in three years.


Bob Heeter
Registered user
Ruby Hill
on Jul 18, 2023 at 8:21 am
Bob Heeter, Ruby Hill
Registered user
on Jul 18, 2023 at 8:21 am

This is a 75% rate increase being phased in … the complicated math conceals how large it is.

Suppose your usual bill is $100 now. the first 30% increase takes it to $130. The subsequent 20% increase takes it to $156 (not 150) since presumably it’s a 20% increase on the newer rate. The final 12% increase takes the hypothetical bill to $175. So overall that’s a 75% increase from the original $100.

It would help if the article would clarify two things: whether the second and third increases are in fact applied sequentially, and whether these costs will apply to all water charges or just the base rate for having any water supply at all.


125
Registered user
Vintage Hills Elementary School
on Jul 18, 2023 at 9:19 am
125, Vintage Hills Elementary School
Registered user
on Jul 18, 2023 at 9:19 am

Previous City Councils share blame for this significant increase — no increases in 11 years despite the drought and known PFAS / water-quality issues? What kind of responsible governance is that? I am not excusing the current city council majority, but their
Predecessors share the blame for this situation, too.


Michael Austin
Registered user
Pleasanton Meadows
on Jul 18, 2023 at 9:51 am
Michael Austin , Pleasanton Meadows
Registered user
on Jul 18, 2023 at 9:51 am

Previous city councils did not throw millions of dollars into an old house and a second skate park.


Becky Dennis
Registered user
Foxborough Estates
on Jul 18, 2023 at 11:07 am
Becky Dennis, Foxborough Estates
Registered user
on Jul 18, 2023 at 11:07 am

While people, myself among them, may disagree with some Council decisions, I do think they would be getting it right by supporting an increase in water rates. The need to pay more for quality water delivery is the inevitable consequence of our past land use decisions and the current times we live in. Postponing investment will likely only result in declining water service quality and increased costs down the line. You may still vote for different councilmembers in the future, but at least the adequacy of water service will have been resolved.


Michael Austin
Registered user
Pleasanton Meadows
on Jul 18, 2023 at 11:50 am
Michael Austin , Pleasanton Meadows
Registered user
on Jul 18, 2023 at 11:50 am

The bothersome issue is the water quality.
Rate increase will not improve water quality anytime soon.
Maybe rate increases will impress financers when city attempts to barrow money.


Dave
Registered user
Highland Oaks
on Jul 18, 2023 at 11:53 am
Dave, Highland Oaks
Registered user
on Jul 18, 2023 at 11:53 am

Lets see here.

*Proposed increases to the city's water rates, starting at 30% on
*Single-family residential customers increase of about $33 every other month during the first year
*Beaudin said in the July 13 press release. "A recently released study by the U.S. Geological Survey shows that 45% of the drinking water provided from private wells and public supplies across the country indicates evidence of PFAS contaminants."

Yet the city is mandating new housing somewhere in the neighborhood of 4,00 to 6,000 Units, Disproportionately Located on the North West Side of Pleasanton.

Where is the water going to come from to supply 4k to 6k Families?
How are we supposed to ration when we will be adding 4k to 6k Units.

The simple solution it to increase water supply. The leaders in this state many many years ago build a water supply system that could withstand 4 to 5 years of drought.

We need to use our water collection more efficiently.


Swagu
Registered user
Avila
on Jul 18, 2023 at 11:55 am
Swagu, Avila
Registered user
on Jul 18, 2023 at 11:55 am

I bought a TDS water tester which tests water quality (about $15 on amazon). Most waters were fine (bottled, reverse osmosis) and tested low for parts per million contaminants.

The tap water in Pleasanton was over 500ppm, which is technically above EPA safe limits. Why are we paying more for a product with terrible results? For anyone who wants to try the test themselves get a water TDS tester on amazon. It's mindblowing how bad the water is and the price we pay for it.


Sharon P
Registered user
Pleasanton Meadows
on Jul 18, 2023 at 12:05 pm
Sharon P, Pleasanton Meadows
Registered user
on Jul 18, 2023 at 12:05 pm

For perspective, Figure 1 on page 4 of the packet for tonight's Council meeting shows we pay far less than any other community in the area. Some currently pay nearly twice as much and Livermore pays about 50% more The article says that water rates haven't been reworked since 2011 - that's 12 years ago. There are also discounts for low income residents and seniors. To pay for PFAS we will have to pay higher rates to cover the cost of clean water. We've been lucky that our rates have been so low for as long as they have.


keeknlinda
Registered user
Vintage Hills
on Jul 18, 2023 at 12:38 pm
keeknlinda, Vintage Hills
Registered user
on Jul 18, 2023 at 12:38 pm

Swagu, your TDS test is for Total Dissolved Solids. All it means is that we have hard water. Most of us know that, there is nothing wrong with it from a safety standpoint. PFAS/PFOS/PFhXs are unrelated to the mineral content (hard water) are remaining steady, according to the latest test results available to the city, per my own ongoing conversations and emails with city staff. A question I asked just yesterday.
I have stated ad nauseum that I've been drinking, cooking with, and washing clothes with unfiltered Pleasanton tap water for more than 50 years. The white residue that appears on sink faucets, where water accumulates happens when the total dissolved solids lose their liquid component and remain on the surface. A bottle of vinegar under the sink to use for an occasional wipe and rinse of those nooks and crusty crannies cures it just fine. Many women know a vinegar rinse for the hair can be a good thing, too, no matter the water source. Or you can choose, as you have done, an expensive whole-house filtration system. Not everyone can afford to do that, but to suggest they are at some sort of health risk because of it is just wrong. I choose the vinegar approach, seem to be advancing in age pretty well, so I'm not about to say our water is bad.


keeknlinda
Registered user
Vintage Hills
on Jul 18, 2023 at 1:30 pm
keeknlinda, Vintage Hills
Registered user
on Jul 18, 2023 at 1:30 pm

Sharon P. the article does say that our rates are the lowest. I also asked for the source of that information and didn't really get a solid answer. I've spent the last 4 days trying to find a definitive answer and haven't yet been able to verify it. Pleasanton's water page is unwieldy, under improvement, but has been notoriously bad for years. I've been promised in 2 or 3 months it will be really good. I've been hearing that for 7 years, so forgive me if I remain skeptical until I see it. I promise I'll leap for joy.
Livermore's city pages are a joy to behold, and their water rate structure is clear and easy to understand. Like all water agencies, a lot gets packed in. Actual water use per unit, and in Pleasanton, water charges from Zone 7, Pleasanton sewer charges plus DSRSD sewer charges, meter charges, seasonal drought charges, recycled water charges, discounts for some, conservation advantages, etc., so saying there hasn't been an increase is questionable at best. The city is saying cost of living increases, which have been added until the last 3 years don't count. They have also changed to a fixed (infrastructure cost) and variable (how much water is used)component method of billing. That created an increase because even if you use NO water, you are billed the fixed component, both from Zone 7 and the city, because each has its own distribution system. Not saying it's wrong, just saying it is.
Confused yet? Zone 7 water and DSRSD increases were passed through to the ratepayer, aka customer. Semantics. That increases our utility bill, whether they admit it or not. Semantics again.
Staff is responding to a "FIX IT NOW" directive from council without even looking at these pieces in calling for the huge increase NOW.
If residents never attend, read about, or watch another council meeting, we need to pay attention to this one. We still won't know the whole story, but at least we'll come away better-informed than we are now.


resident
Registered user
Danbury Park
on Jul 18, 2023 at 1:42 pm
resident, Danbury Park
Registered user
on Jul 18, 2023 at 1:42 pm

You wants us to pay how much for water that literally smells like poop, corrodes your pipes, barely meets Federal total dissolvable solid regulations and comes from wells infected with Forever chemicals????

Seriously is this a joke??
City council, care to respond?


MsVic
Registered user
Mission Park
on Jul 18, 2023 at 3:46 pm
MsVic, Mission Park
Registered user
on Jul 18, 2023 at 3:46 pm

Please go in person tonight to the meeting at the operations center - not being held at city hall - speak to this outrageous increase when they don't even know what the expensive consultants are going to propose. I wish I could attend, I will be there on zoom and will be raising my hand.


Debbie Wallace
Registered user
Stoneridge
on Jul 19, 2023 at 5:15 pm
Debbie Wallace, Stoneridge
Registered user
on Jul 19, 2023 at 5:15 pm

I was at last night's council meeting. Given the importance and urgency of adding the Proposed New Water Rates to the agenda I would have thought it would and should have been handled with more importance.

Showing how wrong Council has its priorities. the water crisis topic was on the agenda AFTER a very long 2023 survey results presentation, and of course all the results had to be discussed, wasting a lot of time. Then to take up more time, Council patted themselves on the back for the “good” job the survey results showed, and in making sure that it was noted that they did not pad the results, or “stuff the ballot box”. Interestingly enough, with only 711 residents being surveyed out of 79,000+ residents, the results DID show the concern for our water. ..and no, I was not part of that survey!
..and how much did this survey cost us?

By the time the discussion on the Water Rates Proposal was up for discussion and all questions were asked and responded to between the City & Council, it was late and some of the potential speakers left. There COULD have been more than 5 speakers!

It was disappointing to see how last night's meeting was run, an eye opener on how the City has mishandled this water crisis, and to see all the poor judgment calls Council has made.

We DESERVED an explanation for this water crisis, and not in a last minute meeting, in the middle of the summer when many residents are out of town.

We DESERVE an explanation of how Council justified allocating 10 million dollars for the Century House and skate park projects. Council Member Arkin has stated that the $5 and $6 million dollar projects (for the skate park and century house) can't begin to address a water treatment plant. At least it would have been a start help to offset some of the costs. This is and has been a huge debt that will affect us all for years to come, and sadly we will still have terrible drinking water!

We need Council members with better judgment and priorities!!


Michael Austin
Registered user
Pleasanton Meadows
on Jul 20, 2023 at 5:37 pm
Michael Austin , Pleasanton Meadows
Registered user
on Jul 20, 2023 at 5:37 pm


Regarding the survey the city council is proud of:

750 is what percent of 80,000? The answer = 0.96875 percent = less than one percent.

The people with comment on this thread is 99% disapproval for water rate increase.
The speakers against the water rate increase at Wednesday evening council meeting was 100 percent, against the water rate increase.
What part of NO does the majority on the Pleasanton city council not understand?


keeknlinda
Registered user
Vintage Hills
on Jul 21, 2023 at 11:15 am
keeknlinda, Vintage Hills
Registered user
on Jul 21, 2023 at 11:15 am

Why not start by having the 55% of us who use less than 20 units pay into the pot? Conservation should definitely be rewarded, but if more than half of us are able to conserve at that high a volume, of course the funds will be depleted! Drop the number to 10 units and an immediate influx in funds will surely result. Yes, I'll be paying more,but shouldn't I be part of the solution, not part of the problem?
Look at your bill. How much are YOU charged for Pleasanton water? Do you use more than 10 but less than 20? Livermore figures it around 8.
And if we talk about Pleasanton having lowest rates, why don't we talk about Pleasanton's costs? Profit is strictly forbidden. Water agencies seldom are open and above-board about how much they actually pay for the water. It's there, but finding it in amongst all the other hair-splitting data, good luck finding it.
My guess is once it's found, it will have been less than others because we have had 3500 acre-feet of volume for no cost. Distribution cost, or Operation and Maintenence, sure, that's the same. But actually paying for water, not.
If we can have rates increased by 30% meeting the September deadline, we should be able to reduce the volume for conservation rewards by the September deadline.


Michael Austin
Registered user
Pleasanton Meadows
on Jul 21, 2023 at 11:33 am
Michael Austin , Pleasanton Meadows
Registered user
on Jul 21, 2023 at 11:33 am

Well, I agree with council member Jack Balch. We need a rate increase, however why not start it with 20%?

I sent that question to the city manager; I attached spread sheet for the previous five years showing our water consumption over the 60 billing periods averaged less than 8 units per billing period.

We have had two droughts last five years; out family's conservation effort caused us to lose 12 fruit trees in our back yard. Those family's that have conserved should have a break in the rate. Had they not conserved, we would be in a larger hole then what we have now.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.