Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

State Senator Steve Glazer and Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan pose with Tesla Park photographs during celebration event held by Friends of Tesla Park after the state confirmed its preservation agreement for the land outside of Livermore. (Photo by Al Johnson/Friends of Tesla Park)

Now that the storm has settled, I wanted to take some time to look back at the results locally.

No, I’m not talking about the rain and wind that dominated our lives last Sunday; I’m reflecting on the whirlwind that was the end of the 2021 state legislative season.

Day after day in September and early October, Gov. Gavin Newsom was releasing lists filled with dozens of bills he’d approved or rejected ahead of the Oct. 10 action deadline.

With so many bills to wade through, it was tough for me to keep up with all relevant outcomes in the moment. And what I think readers really turn to the Weekly to highlight from the State Legislature is how their Tri-Valley representatives performed.

So I recently went back through the results for bills authored by State Senator Steve Glazer and Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan — the two Orinda Democrats who represent the Tri-Valley in the respective houses.

I read through the bills’ actual text (gotta love dense legislative writing…) and searched for key stakeholders’ interpretations to build my understanding, as any good reporter does. It’d be a good process for any resident/voter too.

In the back of my mind, I also coax the seed former Assemblywoman Joan Buchanan (D-Alamo) planted years ago. She practiced a “less is more” mentality; basically, to paraphrase, that voters didn’t elect her to write all sorts of bills on all sorts of topics. Author only on the important — while casting votes in line with your constituents’ ideals on all of the rest.

Jeremy Walsh, editor.

By my count, Bauer-Kahan had six bills signed into law by Newsom this summer/fall while Glazer had five bills approved by the governor and two vetoed. Many passed with support from members of both parties, as well as some showing disagreement within their own.

Of course, probably their biggest joint accomplishment wasn’t a standalone bill at all, but rather a deal with state officials, local leaders and environmental groups as part of the budget process to preserve and protect Tesla Park outside Livermore. It was a long time coming.

Bauer-Kahan had three bills inked by Newsom in her gender equity platform.

Leading the way was Assembly Bill 1356, lengthy legislation sponsored by Planned Parenthood to strengthen legal protections and assurances for reproductive health care services in California. This one earned a spot in a special signing ceremony with Newsom.

AB 378 implements gender-neutral language for constitutional officers across the Government Code (apparently in 2021 some portions of law still specifically used “he” or “him”). AB 439 adds nonbinary as a gender option for state death certificates.

Another interesting one, AB 624 makes a judge’s order transferring an underage defendant’s criminal case from juvenile court to adult court subject to appeal.

Her AB 1033 clarifies and amends the process for resolving paid family leave disputes for small businesses, which can often be time-consuming and expensive for both sides. It also adds protections for leave needed to care for a parent-in-law.

And AB 1320 focuses on customer assistance for money transmission companies (with an eye on money transfer apps) to require a live, staffed phone line for customers.

For Glazer, his list of five bills “chaptered” this session included Senate Bill 60, which allows increased penalties for short-term rental hosts who violate local rental laws, including fines up to $5,000 — inspired in part by the circumstances of the shooting at an Airbnb house in Orinda that killed five people on Halloween 2019.

Especially relevant to the Livermore Valley, Glazer’s SB 19 gives licensed winegrowers (or brandy-makers) the ability to open a second off-site tasting room.

SB 446 aims to make it easier for a convicted person later found factually innocent of that crime to receive compensation under the existing claim process.

SB 594 covers changes primarily to the upcoming June 7 election’s deadlines and requirements to account for the redistricting process being delayed due to the pandemic slowing the release of federal census data.

Another election bill, SB 686 increases campaign disclosure mandates for limited liability companies.

One of two vetoes for Glazer, SB 804 would require the state to establish a forestry training center in Northern California for formerly incarcerated people trying to become firefighters. Newsom lauded the concept but wanted it handled through the budget process due to cost.

And SB 792 would add a layer of reporting for large online retailers in their tax returns to specify in which local jurisdiction certain goods were delivered to a buyer. The governor argued it would be redundant and “a burdensome and costly new reporting requirement for many retailers that is unrelated to their tax obligations.”

Both legislators did other work throughout the term, such as securing money for projects in their districts through the budget, and they have a slew of other bills still in committee or other phases of the process.

In particular, I’ll be watching Bauer-Kahan’s AB 988 (establishing a 988 mental health crisis hotline) and AB 1440 (on civil rights crimes) and Glazer’s SB 593 (on school accountability) and SB 22 (“Public Preschool, K-12, and College Health and Safety Bond Act of 2022”).

I suggest you do the same, via leginfo.legislature.ca.gov. You can track their voting records there too.

Editor’s note: Jeremy Walsh has been the editor of the Pleasanton Weekly since February 2017. His “What a Week” column runs on the first and third Fridays of the month.

Most Popular

Jeremy Walsh is the associate publisher and editorial director of Embarcadero Media Foundation's East Bay Division, including the Pleasanton Weekly, LivermoreVine.com and DanvilleSanRamon.com. He joined...

Join the Conversation

13 Comments

  1. So we loose Baker to moronic voter reaction to trump and get Bauer-khan who isn’t passing any meaningful bills.

    Elections have consequences

  2. I do not understand the celebration!

    Democrats 50% of population out number republicans 25% of the population, non affiliated 25%. Half of California’s population is not represented in any legislation.

  3. I liked Catherine Baker and it is unfortunate she doesn’t represent us anymore. I wouldn’t blame it on the “moronic reaction” to Trump. I blame it on the head moron Trump and his Trumpsters followers. They are ruining the Republican Party and must be annihilated.

  4. Kevin,
    While I can understand your reply, it’s not justification why baker was voted out. It just ddd to the argument that voters are voting on party lines over actual thoughtful issue and policy proposals

  5. 2018 (when Catherine lost) was a disastrous election year for Republicans. It got worse into 2020 when Republicans lost presidency and the senate. Trump and Trumplicans are the only reason for these losses.

    It is always good to vote based on thoughtful issues and policy decisions. I guess that is why many Republican states are making harder for brown and black people to vote -NOT. Fixing something that is not broken. this is only going to motivate Democrats to come out very strong like we did for Newsome against who (I cannot remember his name).

    “Thoughtful” issues that Republicans are focusing on:
    – CRT
    – Replacement Theory and immigrants being blamed for Covid
    – Anti-vax
    – allowing afghans into the country – more Muslims from s*** hole countries as opposed to beautiful white people from Norway and Easter Europe where Trump’ s wife comes from.
    – creating trillions of $ in deficit by giving rich people and corporations tax benefits in 2017 while not giving a darn about regular people.

  6. Same broken record, you paint with broad strokes and have no problem engaging in the broad stereotyping you ironically condemn those you vote against of practicing.

    What’s worse is your party line vote is now “worthless “ in ca. Dems won’t work harder than they have to because they can just expect your vote – doesn’t need to be earned. Republicans won’t try because it’s not worth the fight…..so you get mediocrity not the best of both.

  7. “So we loose Baker to moronic voter reaction to trump and get Bauer-khan who isn’t passing any meaningful bills. Elections have consequences”

    It doesn’t help that the Pleasanton Weekly endorsed Bauer-Kahan last November – calling her so called accomplishments “impressive”.

    Really “impressive” to have yet another party line Democrat claiming the state somehow does not regulate/spend/tax enough, getting bills rubber stamped by a super majority in the state legislature, and then signed by a governor of the same party? Not really.

  8. The “thoughtful” issues I listed above are not broad brush. They are topics that Republican leadership is talking about. It is because the only tool they have is to keep the Trumpsters angry so they can make it through the primaries.

    Check out the Infrastructure bill and the Build Back Better bill – those are topics that Democratic leadership are talking about – stuff that help every day people. May not be perfect but it is aligned with their strategy of helping the poor and middle class.

    I will not vote for a mediocre candidate. Put up Catherine and I will vote for her. But, the guy who ran for governor (cannot recall his name) – wow, calling him mediocre is being too nice to him.

  9. Kevin,
    Your lack of respect for people with differing opinions is concerning, your consistent grouping of them as “trumpsters” , when that’s a subset of the group, shows your attempt to just belittle and write them off by using a derogatory phrase to apply to all of them. Your approach is juvenile, like a child calling someone a doodyhead regardless of what idea they are trying to discuss. But I guess I can’t blame you, newsom did the same – making up a story about party politics being the motivation over the reality of the issues he’s failing to address and the fact Republicans, Democrats, and undeclared voters supported his recall. So why should I expect his supporters to think differently when he himself doesn’t.

    There were several that ran for governor, Larry Elder is who I’m guessing you are referring to, and I agree he wasn’t qualified to be governor. Personally of the candidates I thought Kevin Faulconer was the far more qualified contender on the ballot. But that’s my opinion.

  10. I have zero respect for Trump and Trumplicans. They represent huge danger to our constitution and democracy. Most Republicans have turned into Trumplicans. There are still a few brave Republicans left who reject Trump and Trumplicans.

    Democrats are divided in policies, spending and social issues. Republicans are divided on foundational truths vs lies, respect for the institutions ( unless it is good for them). Which is a healthier party and will eventually triumph? Let’s hope it will be the brave Republicans and Democrats.

Leave a comment