|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
By Sara Gholami
On a quiet street in Oakland, a teenager counts money from a small bag of pills he never plans to take. This scenario is an example that reflects patterns researchers are observing across economically challenged communities.
The deal is not addicted; he’s just trying to survive.
According to a study published in the Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, opioid-related deaths were highest in neighborhoods with high economic hardships at around 37 per 100,000 population, compared to 12 to 20 in areas with low hardship levels.
In the Bay Area, it’s not only about drug use; many adolescents are selling opioids without ever using them. Poverty, housing instability, and lack of access to legitimate economic opportunities drive teens into the drug trade as a way of survival, exposing them to serious legal and health risks.
For these teens, socioeconomic pressures, rather than personal choice, are the driving force behind their involvement.
Research examining adolescent involvement in drug distribution reveals that participation is not always linked to substance use. A national study of U.S. adolescents by a journal, the Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation, identified a distinct group of teens who “sold but did not use drugs.” These teens “demonstrated higher levels of delinquency” compared to teens who didn’t sell or use drugs.
This challenges the common perception that all teen drug sellers are addicts. Selling drugs is often less about personal desire and more about trying to navigate economic hardship and social pressures.
Another study of street dealing youth, this one by the Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, found that 58% of these teens were involved in street-level drug dealing, with “homelessness [being] independently associated with drug dealing”.
Poverty and housing instability are intertwined; also linked are teens with few avenues to meet basic needs in a safe manner. In areas with high poverty rates, the education system is underfunded and students have limited employment opportunities.
So, selling drugs may seem like one of the only viable paths to survival.
Parental supervision (or the lack thereof) worsens the problem. Teens in low-income households often have caregivers working multiple jobs, struggling to make ends meet, leaving them less monitored and more exposed to risky environments.
Peer pressure and community normalization of street-level selling further reinforces this cycle. In these circumstances, involvement in the drug trade often functions as a coping mechanism rather than a lifestyle choice.
Community access to drugs also contributes to the crisis. Research in the journal Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation has shown that access to prescription opioids among teenagers is often from their friends, family members, and even from their own home medicine cabinets. Although these teens are not abusing these drugs, easy access increases the likelihood that teens will sell to generate income.
It takes more than just policing to solve this crisis. Investing in the community, and providing teens with positive alternatives such as mentorship, after-school programs, job skills, and stable housing can go a long way in solving the problem.
Programs like YouthBuild provides teens with construction training, leadership development, and chances to earn educational credits toward a high-school diploma or GED, all while receiving a stipend.
In other words, a teen facing financial difficulties can enroll in a program where they can learn valuable trade skills, complete their education, and earn income.
By providing a safe environment and positive role models, these programs keep teens off the streets.
Educational programs that raise awareness about the dangers of selling drugs, even for non-users, are equally essential. By providing teens with a way to achieve financial security legally, communities can reduce the appeal of street-level drug trade as a survival strategy.
The Bay Area’s youth opioid crisis is not solely a matter of drug use; it is a social and economic issue. When teens sell drugs without using them, they may be victims of circumstance. These young people could be living in poverty, or unstable homes, and being denied opportunities. Recognizing this distinction is crucial for designing interventions that address the root causes of teenage involvement in the opioid business.
By addressing these systemic challenges, communities can create safe and sustainable alternatives that allow adolescents to satisfy their needs without resorting to selling drugs and facing the legal and health consequences.
Every teenager deserves the chance to build a future defined by opportunity, rather than survival. Meaningful change begins with understanding these structural barriers and committing to solutions that replace anguish with possibility.
This article was written as part of a program to educate youth and others about Alameda County’s opioid crisis, prevention and treatment options. The program is funded by the Alameda County Behavioral Health and the grant is administered by Three Valleys Community Foundation.
