|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Play Wii Bowling on the big screen from 3:30-4:30 p.m. every Wednesday afternoon at the Pleasanton Senior Center, 5353 Sunol Blvd. Cost is $1.75 for residents; $2.25 for non-residents. Call 931-5365 or visit www.pleasantonseniorcenter.org.
By Amory Gutierrez
I hope they also require you to purchase a brain, cuz you apparently don’t have one…
No kidding.
Did you read how the gov’t is selling off it’s Citibank shares, at an expected profit of about 7.5 BILLION dollars?
Did I say 7.5 BILLION DOLLARS profit from 25 BILLION DOLLARS gov’t ownership shares? I’m sorry, can someone tell me the return on that investment?
Socialists.
That’s right, sweetie, “no matter what.”
Even if it’s fear-inducing, speculative BS. Cuz that’s all ya got.
PMFT,
I said TRUTH!
Or if you have no response then continue insulting, distorting, lying and diverting from the actual point of the OP. Your choice
What a bunch of mean b*%t#s. I’m am getting SO sick of anti-stupid Queen B ruining every topic…pretty much dragging PW further into the gutter. Obviously, named herself….nobody would have made that mistake.
Thanks for the link, the paper appears to be, according to an Ezra Klein column http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2009/12/max_baucus_the_individual_mand.html , Sen Baucus’ basis for claiming the constitutionality of HCR. The paper states that there are likely to be additional challenges based on the 1st, 5th, and 10th amendment issues, and states that they “are unlikely to be successful”.
The paper also confirms that there are “no examples of requiring a purchase”, ie “there is no existing social legislation that serves as a perfect legal analogy to an individual mandate for private health insurance” and outlines why the mandate has been set up as a taxation provision.
Clearly, there are legal challenges looming that this paper foresaw, we will just have to wait to see what SCOTUS says, eh?