Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

Local elected leaders need to declare a public safety emergency in Oakland because of rampant crime in the city impacting minority communities the hardest, the Oakland branch of the NAACP said in a lengthy statement last week.

Alameda County District Attorney Pamela Price. (Contributed photo)

“Everyone is in danger” in Oakland, the NAACP argued in its statement released July 27. “Failed leadership, including the movement to defund the police, our District Attorney’s unwillingness to charge and prosecute people who murder and commit life threatening serious crimes, and the proliferation of anti-police rhetoric have created a heyday for Oakland criminals.”

If criminals face no consequences for their actions, “crime will continue to soar,” according to the NAACP.

Crime in Alameda County’s biggest city, Oakland, is up 26% overall from last year at this time. The city’s violent crime index, which is a combination of killings, rapes, robberies and aggravated assaults, is up 15%. Slayings in Oakland were down 13% year over year as of last week.

In response to the statement, District Attorney Pamela Price said her office is “disappointed” Bishop Bob Jackson and the Oakland chapter of the NAACP “would take a false narrative on such an important matter. We would expect more from” them.

The same minority communities hit hardest by crime are facing biases in the criminal justice system and mass incarceration. The divide is playing out countywide with at least two factions facing off over whether to recall Price, who is being criticized for being too lenient on criminals.

Price says she is reforming a biased criminal justice system.

Price and Oakland police met with Oakland Hills residents in Montclair on the night of July 27 for a public safety meeting as a recall effort grows. About 400 people attended.

A leader of the recall effort said in an interview that day that her main issue is how Price treats the families of violent crime victims.

Brenda Grisham, whose son was killed in Oakland violence in 2010, is helping to lead the Save Alameda For Everyone recall effort, based on paperwork filed with the Alameda County Registrar of Voters’ Office.

One reason for Grisham’s displeasure is what she says is Price’s unwillingness to give victims’ families a say in the sentencing of those convicted of killing their sons and daughters. Price also disregarded victims’ families at a meeting in April at a local church, Grisham said.

“I’m loyal to the families,” said Grisham, who started a foundation in memory of her son and who is part of Family Support Advocates, a group of local mothers who have lost children to violence.

A petition on Change.org to gauge support for a recall of Price had garnered more than 24,000 signatures as of July 28.

Save Alameda For Everyone will officially collect signatures as the effort moves ahead. The recall effort has the support of the Alameda County Republican Party Central Committee, which passed a resolution in May supporting it.

The Alameda County Democratic Central Committee is considering a resolution this week to oppose a recall, a member said by email.

Florence McCrary, who lost her only son Terrence Paul McCrary Jr. to a stray bullet in Oakland in 2016, is also angered by Price’s actions.

Price met recently with Family Support Advocates and came unprepared, Florence McCrary said. Price did not know the substance of the cases the mothers wanted answers on, which McCrary said angered them.

But the district attorney cares deeply about victims’ families, according to Price’s office, adding that the district attorney is not light on crime. It is a change in state law that is guiding sentencing in criminal cases like the ones Price has faced criticism for, her office said.

Price has become a lightning rod for the issue, though all district attorneys across the state must abide by the same law.

Price’s office said that in the past, too many enhancements were filed, disproportionately affecting Black residents and prompting changes to state law around sentencing.

“The criminal justice system really has not been working well for a long time,” said Rivka Polatnick, a resident of Alameda County for more than 50 years and a Price supporter who worked on her campaign to be elected district attorney.

She said it has not worked for underserved communities such as Black and poor people.

“The statistics are alarming,” Polatnick said.

She said, “We need someone who is going to do something about it” and Price is that person.

“I don’t feel the answer is to go back to mass incarceration,” Polatnick said.

Leaders with the NAACP in Oakland said criminals know that no one will come to help people in danger in Oakland because the city needs more police officers and the 911 system doesn’t work.

“There is nothing compassionate or progressive about allowing criminal behavior to fester & rob Oakland residents of their basic rights to public safety,” NAACP leaders said. “It is not racist or unkind to want to be safe from crime.”

Part of the solution, according to the NAACP, is to provide jobs, training and mentors for youth so they have alternatives to crime.

Most Popular

Join the Conversation

4 Comments

  1. It’s not the responsibility of the District Attorney of Alameda County to “fix” the disproportionate incarceration problem. Being elected while running on those expectations was wrong.

  2. The political climate in Pleasanton, is moderately liberal.

    Alameda County, CA is very liberal. In Alameda County, CA 79.8% of the people voted Democrat in the last presidential election, 17.6% voted for the Republican Party, and the remaining 2.6% voted Independent.

    Individual campaign contributions in Pleasanton CA.

    In the last four years (2018-2021) there was 12,348 contributions totaling $2,665,630 to the Democratic party and liberal campaigns, averaging $216 per contribution.

    In the last four years, there were 1,882 contributions totaling $518,635 to the Republican party and conservative campaigns, averaging $276 per contribution.

    If Pamela Price is recalled, she would be allowed to run again in the next election. Given the liberal disposition of this county, she will be reelected.

    What if your two-year old is shot dead in his/her car seat?

  3. Elections have consequences. Pamela was very clear with her intentions. And her she was still elected. This voter didn’t vote for her based on her platform! We are suffering consequences of our own local election, with a Mayor that lacks leadership skills and council members that behave more like sheep than thought leaders.

  4. Don’t complain, we get what we vote for. Democrat, Republican, it doesn’t matter. All too often we don’t research the candidates History. We just pull the lever for the party we are registered under. If we don’t get a grip on the lawlessness that has been threatening our communities and ruining innocent peoples lives we will be doomed. We have laws that are not enforced, prosecutors are soft on sentencing. If you watch any TV Channel for a while you will see one law firm after another advertising that they can get you a bigger settlement than any other ( the ads are very cleverly written) they say if it’s not your fault, and the naive take the bait.
    Our work ethic is in the sewer.
    Why should people work hard when we are constantly badgered with the message that if you vote for me your problems will become mine, or if you call my law firm we can get you more $$, It’s time to wake up, all that politicians and attorney’s do is make promises, line their own pockets.

Leave a comment