News

Pleasanton city council holds first district map hearing

Future growth and conflicts of interest are questioned in drawing election boundaries

The Pleasanton City Council held the first of several legally mandated public hearings on Tuesday before city officials will draw up new council districts and switch from at-large to district elections.

In September, the council agreed to transition to district elections, which will ultimately divide the city into districts, with each area being represented by a council member who lives inside those boundaries. The mayor will continue to remain at-large and be elected by all voters in Pleasanton.

At least two public meetings must be held within 30 days of each other before drawing any district map, according to state law. A staff report estimates $50,000 will be spent for outside legal counsel and a demographer to help draft district boundaries. Using council feedback and public input, one or more maps will be drafted and eventually brought back for final approval.

Each district must have approximately the same population, cannot have race be the primary factor, and should also be geographically contiguous "to the extent practicable" and "respect the geographic integrity of any local neighborhood or local community of interest."

The council also cannot adopt district boundaries "for the purpose of favoring or discriminating against a political party."

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

Mayor Karla Brown said at the Jan. 4 council meeting, "We received numerous emails from residents saying they did not like the idea of districting and they did not want us to pursue districting," but the city doesn't have much chance of fighting the matter in court. Brown said the city of Santa Monica has already spent $22 million without any success, and that "we're not going to be frivolous with taxpayer dollars in an unlikely litigation."

During the public hearing on Tuesday, one resident asked what would happen if nobody ran for election in one of the districts and was told it would be handled by the council through their appointment process.

Another speaker asked how the city came up with criteria to divide Pleasanton into four districts. Demographer Michael Wagaman said the number of proposed districts are based on the size of the current city council, but there is also the matter of "how those criteria are applied and what are those decisions, what are those communities of interest."

"That's what this process is, is really identifying how those criteria that are coming down from the state really apply within the unique demographics of and unique situation of your city," Wagaman said.

Brown asked whether preferences for sitting council members are allowed, and was told that state law uses and applies an order of priority, but does not prohibit incumbents from being considered.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

"It is frustrating as an elected official to say I'm only really going to focus on one neighborhood when I'm running for office knowing those are the only people who can vote and elect me," Brown said.

When discussing how to identify communities of interest, Vice Mayor Valerie Arkin wondered if elementary school boundaries are "something that has been taken into consideration heavily." Wagaman confirmed that "common assets like schools are absolutely one of the ways to define communities of interest," though he added "that's not a uniform rule because some schools have open enrollment … but that would be an example of the kind of direction this body could give."

Arkin said, "As it's mentioned in the presentation about race, it must not be the predominant factor … it can be a subordinate type of factor. I know this is an odd question but what does that look like? What does it mean if it's a subordinate factor?"

Wagaman explained, "there are lots of ways that race and ethnicity may correspond to other things that we're looking at."

"For example, you may have a portion of the town … that has different socioeconomic issues," Wagaman said. "And those different socioeconomic issues may be correlated to the fact that that area has heavily large immigrant populations and, therefore, they have different language access issues, therefore, they have different issues of education, and all those issues are all correlated to issues of race and ethnicity."

Arkin and Councilmember Kathy Narum both brought up the city's Housing Element update that is currently underway and asked whether future population changes and existing elementary school boundaries can be taken into account when drawing the map.

Wagaman said they need to rely on data from the 2020 US Census and existing city boundaries but "could identify areas expected to grow." Any areas potentially annexed in the future would also require an adjustment to the district boundaries.

"If there's an area in the city that you know is going to grow faster, for example, than another part, it is acceptable to say okay we'll leave that district a little smaller, knowing it's going to get bigger over the next 10 years," Wagaman said. "You still have to be within those acceptable deviations but it is something you can look at."

Councilmember Julie Testa noted, "When we break into four districts, we have a smaller portion of the city we're representing but we also have conflicts of interest", as well as questions about whether a council member's home could create a conflict of interest within that smaller district when voting on items like the Housing Element.

"If I have to recuse … where does that leave my constituents when I, their representative, is now conflicted out?" Testa said.

Tom Willis, another demographer also hired by the city, said the conflict of interest rules don't change, adding "that can be a tough situation, and I don't think there's a particularly good answer for that."

"The answer is a district can pretty much be left without a representative," Testa said.

Two more public hearings are scheduled on Jan. 18 and Feb. 3. The council is expected to vote on the final map at their Feb. 24 regular meeting. The transition from at-large to district-based elections will be completed in time for the November general election.

A front row seat to local high school sports.

Check out our new newsletter, the Playbook.

Follow PleasantonWeekly.com and the Pleasanton Weekly on Twitter @pleasantonnews, Facebook and on Instagram @pleasantonweekly for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Your support is vital to us continuing to bring you city government news. Become a member today.

Pleasanton city council holds first district map hearing

Future growth and conflicts of interest are questioned in drawing election boundaries

by / Pleasanton Weekly

Uploaded: Wed, Jan 5, 2022, 1:44 pm

The Pleasanton City Council held the first of several legally mandated public hearings on Tuesday before city officials will draw up new council districts and switch from at-large to district elections.

In September, the council agreed to transition to district elections, which will ultimately divide the city into districts, with each area being represented by a council member who lives inside those boundaries. The mayor will continue to remain at-large and be elected by all voters in Pleasanton.

At least two public meetings must be held within 30 days of each other before drawing any district map, according to state law. A staff report estimates $50,000 will be spent for outside legal counsel and a demographer to help draft district boundaries. Using council feedback and public input, one or more maps will be drafted and eventually brought back for final approval.

Each district must have approximately the same population, cannot have race be the primary factor, and should also be geographically contiguous "to the extent practicable" and "respect the geographic integrity of any local neighborhood or local community of interest."

The council also cannot adopt district boundaries "for the purpose of favoring or discriminating against a political party."

Mayor Karla Brown said at the Jan. 4 council meeting, "We received numerous emails from residents saying they did not like the idea of districting and they did not want us to pursue districting," but the city doesn't have much chance of fighting the matter in court. Brown said the city of Santa Monica has already spent $22 million without any success, and that "we're not going to be frivolous with taxpayer dollars in an unlikely litigation."

During the public hearing on Tuesday, one resident asked what would happen if nobody ran for election in one of the districts and was told it would be handled by the council through their appointment process.

Another speaker asked how the city came up with criteria to divide Pleasanton into four districts. Demographer Michael Wagaman said the number of proposed districts are based on the size of the current city council, but there is also the matter of "how those criteria are applied and what are those decisions, what are those communities of interest."

"That's what this process is, is really identifying how those criteria that are coming down from the state really apply within the unique demographics of and unique situation of your city," Wagaman said.

Brown asked whether preferences for sitting council members are allowed, and was told that state law uses and applies an order of priority, but does not prohibit incumbents from being considered.

"It is frustrating as an elected official to say I'm only really going to focus on one neighborhood when I'm running for office knowing those are the only people who can vote and elect me," Brown said.

When discussing how to identify communities of interest, Vice Mayor Valerie Arkin wondered if elementary school boundaries are "something that has been taken into consideration heavily." Wagaman confirmed that "common assets like schools are absolutely one of the ways to define communities of interest," though he added "that's not a uniform rule because some schools have open enrollment … but that would be an example of the kind of direction this body could give."

Arkin said, "As it's mentioned in the presentation about race, it must not be the predominant factor … it can be a subordinate type of factor. I know this is an odd question but what does that look like? What does it mean if it's a subordinate factor?"

Wagaman explained, "there are lots of ways that race and ethnicity may correspond to other things that we're looking at."

"For example, you may have a portion of the town … that has different socioeconomic issues," Wagaman said. "And those different socioeconomic issues may be correlated to the fact that that area has heavily large immigrant populations and, therefore, they have different language access issues, therefore, they have different issues of education, and all those issues are all correlated to issues of race and ethnicity."

Arkin and Councilmember Kathy Narum both brought up the city's Housing Element update that is currently underway and asked whether future population changes and existing elementary school boundaries can be taken into account when drawing the map.

Wagaman said they need to rely on data from the 2020 US Census and existing city boundaries but "could identify areas expected to grow." Any areas potentially annexed in the future would also require an adjustment to the district boundaries.

"If there's an area in the city that you know is going to grow faster, for example, than another part, it is acceptable to say okay we'll leave that district a little smaller, knowing it's going to get bigger over the next 10 years," Wagaman said. "You still have to be within those acceptable deviations but it is something you can look at."

Councilmember Julie Testa noted, "When we break into four districts, we have a smaller portion of the city we're representing but we also have conflicts of interest", as well as questions about whether a council member's home could create a conflict of interest within that smaller district when voting on items like the Housing Element.

"If I have to recuse … where does that leave my constituents when I, their representative, is now conflicted out?" Testa said.

Tom Willis, another demographer also hired by the city, said the conflict of interest rules don't change, adding "that can be a tough situation, and I don't think there's a particularly good answer for that."

"The answer is a district can pretty much be left without a representative," Testa said.

Two more public hearings are scheduled on Jan. 18 and Feb. 3. The council is expected to vote on the final map at their Feb. 24 regular meeting. The transition from at-large to district-based elections will be completed in time for the November general election.

Comments

Ndna Jnz
Registered user
Mohr Park
on Jan 6, 2022 at 12:06 pm
Ndna Jnz, Mohr Park
Registered user
on Jan 6, 2022 at 12:06 pm

Tuesday’s city council meeting was a great eye-opener regarding the district voting information.

One very important question that alerted me was, if a City project is within the vicinity of a council member’s residence (and/or business address, I assume) and as always, that council member must recuse him/herself, how is there no remedy for representation of that council member’s district. This is un-democratic. The recused council member’s “constituents” have no control over where their representative council member resides; nor do they have control over the proximity to that council member’s residence of a City project. But, in such situations, those registered voters in that district, accounting for 25% of the city of Pleasanton, now have no direct representation or official voice on the council in regard to such project. And this project could be nearly “in their backyard.” As we have seen in previous times in Pleasanton, this can easily turn citizens and neighborhoods against each other.

The cities of California should organize to change the California Voting Rights Act so that it remains fair to all registered voters residing in an affected city. As with AB-9 and AB-10, California’s city leaders should be irate at this sort of control from the State, and as with those same bills from Sacramento, cities should plan to take on this absurdly imbalanced, unfair and problematic law.

Thank you to all council members for asking the right questions Tuesday night, allowing attendees to understand some of the issues this district voting can bring along with it.


Joe V
Registered user
Birdland
on Jan 6, 2022 at 1:10 pm
Joe V, Birdland
Registered user
on Jan 6, 2022 at 1:10 pm

It could better serve the Pleasanton Meadows, to be represented by a residing city council member, with Livermore Airport concerns


Michael Austin
Registered user
Pleasanton Meadows
on Jan 6, 2022 at 3:44 pm
Michael Austin , Pleasanton Meadows
Registered user
on Jan 6, 2022 at 3:44 pm

Living in California with one party rules are a lot like living in China where one party rules. Exception being, China executes its criminals.


Ndna Jnz
Registered user
Mohr Park
on Jan 6, 2022 at 4:23 pm
Ndna Jnz, Mohr Park
Registered user
on Jan 6, 2022 at 4:23 pm

Joe V – There is currently a city council member living in the Stoneridge Dr. path of the airport, and the current mayor lives in an almost adjacent neighborhood to Pleasanton Meadows, also suffering from the airport noise.


Nils
Registered user
Pleasanton Heights
on Jan 7, 2022 at 12:27 pm
Nils, Pleasanton Heights
Registered user
on Jan 7, 2022 at 12:27 pm

I like the new rule. I appreciate the efforts of those who have served, but most are from the same circle we see over and over in the town. It's hard for someone from an underrepresented group to break in, against established name recognition. Someone posted above from the Meadows where I used to live. Absolutely right. This will give a voice to a lot more people in town that don't have that person who has been here forever, who grew up in Ptown and knows everyone.


Nils Erickson
Registered user
Pleasanton Heights
on Jan 7, 2022 at 12:48 pm
Nils Erickson, Pleasanton Heights
Registered user
on Jan 7, 2022 at 12:48 pm

@Ndna - Living in a community is not the same as being selected by that community. Living in the Meadows doesn't mean the Meadows would have selected the elected mayor. The elected mayor may have gotten in based on efforts of those off Muirwood, Kottinger Ranch, and Vintage Hills. That's exactly why I like this rule. It will provide communities to the opportunity to put forth their own representation. I think this city could use that.


Ndna Jnz
Registered user
Mohr Park
on Jan 7, 2022 at 5:09 pm
Ndna Jnz, Mohr Park
Registered user
on Jan 7, 2022 at 5:09 pm

Nils – Do you understand the part of my comment describing a situation in which a city council member for your district also lives in your neighborhod? If someone wants to open a new 24-hour 7-11 three blocks from your house, and the city council member has to recuse themself, your neighborhood now has no direct representation on the council, and so your neighborhood doesn't have a vote on a decision do allow or disallow (and other factors.)

Cool name btw, Nils.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.