Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

Ernest Scherer III was sentenced Friday to two consecutive life sentences without parole with special circumstances for financial gain for the murder of his parents, Ernest Scherer Jr., 60, and Charlene Abendroth, 57, in their Castlewood home in March 2008.

He was also sentenced to two consecutive one-year terms for use of a deadly weapon.

In statements to the court Friday morning before the sentencing, his family members said they lived in fear during the year it took police to arrest him. His aunt, Carolyn Oesterle, said she still suffers from nightmares and troubled sleep, more than three years after the brutal double slaying.

“He hit his parents with a bat, then slashed their throats to make sure they were dead,” said Oesterle. She urged that he never be released.

“Whoever reconsiders this case should bear in mind the devastation these murders have caused my family,” she said in a statement to the court. She said her nephew grew up in a comfortable middle-class family with generous parents.

Oesterle blamed his “sick, selfish lifestyle” for the crime, in which Scherer stood to share an inheritance worth well over $2 million.

“As far as I can see, there are no mitigating circumstances,” she told the court.

She also noted that Abendroth was hit 20 times in the head and that when her brother Scherer Jr. was attacked, “before he died, he probably realized it was his own son.”

Scherer III’s sister Catherine Scherer wept when speaking before the court, saying the killing of her parents left a void in her life.

“The murder of my parents has effectively left me without a family,” she said. “Dreams were lost, promises were broken and our lives will never be the same.”

She added that her daughter has been diagnosed with reactive detachment disorder as a result, and her husband lost his job because he needed to care for their children while she spent time dealing with the trial and her parents’ estate.

Scherer III, 32, a graduate of California High School in San Ramon, spoke briefly on his own behalf.

“I just want to say that I agree with a lot of what was said about my upbringing. I was blessed,” he told the court. “I was loved.”

He seemed to once again try to deflect guilt, saying if people saw on television that police at a murder scene had found DNA and size 12 sneaker prints, they would come to a different conclusion about who was responsible.

“I’ll never understand how they (the jury) reconciled the DNA,” he told the court.

Scherer III appeared at the sentencing in Alameda County Superior Court in Oakland in his red jail outfit with one hand cuffed to a waist shackle. He was found guilty of the double murder on March 28, three years after it happened and has remained in jail.

Friday, he was set to be moved to state prison.

Before the sentencing, Judge Jeffrey Horner denied defense motions for a new trial. In deciding the two life sentences should run consecutively, Horner cited the “horrific nature” of the crime and the level of planning and sophistication involved.

“The real truth of this hideous event is far, far worse … the fact that their son would do this to them,” Horner said in deciding to have the two life sentences run back to back. “A sentence should reflect the damage … the horror the defendant unfolded upon his parents.”

Scherer III, a former Eagle Scout turned professional poker player, was arrested a year after the murders and it was nearly another two years before he was brought to trial. It took three months for the case to be laid out to jurors but less than 11 hours for that jury to convict him on all counts: two charges of murder for financial gain, one count of committing multiple murders, and a use-of-a-deadly weapon charge for using a sharp instrument to kill his parents.

As with the trial, the sentencing had an unusual turn of events, when it was disclosed a female juror had been in communication with Scherer in jail.

“Not a lot of people have the opportunity to correspond with one of the people that convicted them,” Scherer said. It was revealed that Scherer and the juror had exchanged “non-verbal communication” — smiles — to each other during the trial, although the prosecution and defense disagreed on who began the exchange.

Prosecutor Michael Nieto produced copies of the correspondence between the two, noting that the female juror never wavered in her belief that Scherer III was guilty. Nieto, however, was concerned about what he saw as the defendant’s attempts to coerce her into thinking he was innocent.

After sentencing Scherer III, Horner turned his attention to the family and friends of the murdered couple.

“Words fail me. There is no adequate way for me to convey or express the enormity of your loss Nothing … can ever close these wounds,” he said, adding he hoped the family “can at last put them to rest in their hearts, their souls and in their loving memories.”

Most of the jury showed up in court Friday morning to hear the sentencing.

“I spent three months of my life doing this and I wanted to see the conclusion,” said juror Paul Rollins. “I’m really glad I came.”

He added he was shocked to learn about the correspondence between the juror and Scherer III.

Scherer has been held in an isolation cell and was put on suicide watch six days before the sentencing, a deputy told the Weekly.

Abendroth and Scherer Jr. were well known in the community. She was an accounting and lecturing professor at Cal State East Bay. She was also an active member of the Mormon Church. Scherer Jr., an investor and part-time gambler, was actively involved in the Republican Party and was a former San Ramon Valley school board member who was recalled in the 1990s and, up until his death, remained involved in politics.

Most Popular

Join the Conversation

31 Comments

  1. I am so sorry to say this but I am glad that he was found guilty and that he has a life sentence with out the chance of parole. We knew these people and they did not deserve this.

  2. How is a sociopath made? Was this young man raised to worship money and the easy life? Was he ever denied anything by his parents? Did they make excuses for his bad behavior? How did he turn out like this?–he really gives me the creeps. I am not casting blame on the parents, I didn’t know them and have no insight. I am just truly mystified by how remorseless criminals are made. Sometimes one can understand how a hardened thug is angry and without a conscience, when you learn how they were neglected or abused, raised in poverty, but this guy?! It’s not like he had a life of abuse or hardship, did he? Seemed like he was given the world on a platter. How could he murder the people who had given him everything, including life? I too am very sorry for his sister, who has lost her whole family.

  3. Michael said that “unfortunately he will be eligible for parole after ten years”. Forgive me for my legal ignorance, but since the article clearly states that the sentence was for two life sentences “without the possibility of parole”, how is this possible? Thank you.

  4. After watching closely all the media reports about this case, I concluded that he is probably guilty. What still mystifies me is how an amateur is able to kill two people and leave very little evidence. Now a jury has decided he is guilty.

    If this is true, he is a psychopath–a person with no conscience. How do we raise someone to be this way? Or are they born this way? Any insights from professionals would be appreciated.

    I too feel badly for his sister. She has lost her mom, dad, and brother in this whole mess.

  5. I wonder what goes through a persons mind where they think murder is the only resort left them. Why did this man kill his parents? Why did Scott Peterson kill his wife. Fortunately, most people cannot answer because they have humanity in their soul and these two didn’t.

  6. We live in a very dangerous world, with killers and unaccountable public employees who irresponsibly draw unsustainable pensions that are unfunded liabilities.

  7. Two life sentences without the chance of parole is a fitting sentence. I wish we could save the taxpayers money with an immediate death sentence. The money saved could be put into our schools where it’s needed.

  8. There are some ERRORS in this Article:

    (PARAGRAPH #6)
    Inheritance total was worth little over $3 million; -NOT- worth “well over $2 million.”
    Defendant & sister were to receive approx. $1.5 million each.

    (PARAGRAPH #14)
    Defendant stated shoe prints found at scene were size 12 & DNA was “13J.” -NOT- “size 13.”

    (PARAGRAPH #16)
    Defendant appeared in Oakland for his sentencing; -NOT- “Hayward.”

    (PARAGRAPH #16)
    Defendant was found guilty of double murder 3 years after it happened; -NOT- “2 years.”

    .

  9. Thanks so very much CORRECTION for your CORRECTIONS. They really change my way of thinking about the case. Just goes to show you the lengths the liberal media goes to in order to confuse us with the facts. One thing is certain. If we just took the guy out and shot him then we wouldn’t have to finance with our hard earned tax dollars all the unsustainable careers with unaccountable and irresponsible salaries and pensions that will be devoted to making sure this feand lives a more comfortalbe life than me and my family. How much did we have to pay the judge and the outrageous juror fees? CORRECTION did he have a Public Defendor? There it is again. We do us taxpagers end up footing the bill for this?

  10. Interesting to see the Corrections. Thanks for posting.
    I know it is hard for journalists to get all the fact right and get the article out promptly, but they do their best.
    Seems like the court in Oakland vs. Hayward was a pretty basic fact. Why the error?
    And CORRECTIONS, why would the ‘defendant talk’ about what size shoe print? Wouldn’t that more likely be an investigator?
    Why does the paper continue to use such a bad picture? Does he really look like that if I saw him on the street- which I hope can’t happen?
    It is a shame that the Justice system grinds so slow. I would greatly appreciate if this paper would also follow up on stories where police catch criminals, but we never read what happened to the bad guys.

  11. Interesting to see the Corrections. Thanks for posting.
    I know it is hard for journalists to get all the fact right and get the article out promptly, but they do their best.
    Seems like the court in Oakland vs. Hayward was a pretty basic fact. Why the error?
    And CORRECTIONS, why would the ‘defendant talk’ about what size shoe print? Wouldn’t that more likely be an investigator?
    Why does the paper continue to use such a bad picture? Does he really look like that if I saw him on the street- which I hope can’t happen?
    It is a shame that the Justice system grinds so slow. I would greatly appreciate if this paper would also follow up on stories where police catch criminals, but we never read what happened to the bad guys.

  12. Murders are usually committed for either freedom, revenge, or just plain old anger. Freedom from a spouse or situation. Feedom because of the money and assets garnered via the murder. Revenge because I was dissed by that b…. Or just anger–“..he cut me off”.

    Ernie wanted freedom. He was getting a pile of money after his parents were dead. Ernie didn’t like to work for money. He wanted the freedom to play.

    Now Ernie doesn’t have to worry about money–just the guy in the next cell.

  13. What a dazzling analysis, Don. My head’s still spinning from the acumen you have demonstrated for us. You’ve added much to the conversation. Thank you, and we’ll be forever grateful.

  14. nothing wrong with what Don said.
    I find it interesting that this one slight-built guy beat BOTH parents to death with a baseball bat, finally slitting their throats. Much, more torture than with a gun. Maybe if dad had a gun, he could have shot him in the shoulder, and still be alive.

Leave a comment