Town Square

Post a New Topic

PENSION REFORM: San Jose council votes to put issue on ballot

Original post made on Mar 7, 2012

San Jose's city council voted 8 to 3 Tuesday to let voters this June decide whether to approve pension reform for city workers in what Mayor Chuck Reed and other council members call an essential move to free up funding for city services.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, March 6, 2012, 8:03 PM

Comments (8)

Like this comment
Posted by Barry
a resident of Alisal Elementary School
on Mar 7, 2012 at 2:33 pm

Did anyone read the article about Stockton also nearing bankrupty due in large part to the unfunded pensions, notably life-time medican coverage for retirees and spouses after working only one year! This is a broken record and San Jose is no different. Im only annoyed the Council bows out of the decision by putting it to a vote instead, unless in doing so the unions cant challenge it if the voters agree to pension reforms.

If I hear one more public sector employee or teacher complaint about not getting a raise or a cost of living adjustment, I'll bauf. So many of us in the private sector have lost jobs or taken salary reductions, that's its an insult to hear whining about not getting a raise or having to actually contribute to one's own 401K or 457 instead of having the employer (public agencies) pay it. Check out the pay scales yourself. City workers make BETTER salary and compensation packages than a majority of their private sector counter-parts, and teachers work nine months and expect a pay check commensurate with a 12 month job. Many public employees do a great job, but as important are hospital workers and other behind the scenes jobs that contribute to our community.

Like this comment
Posted by Salty Dog
a resident of Ironwood
on Mar 7, 2012 at 2:54 pm

It's not one year! It's after one day! Full life-time medican coverage for just one day of work! What really tears me up is these whining teachers who haven't gotten a raise lately. In the private sector, the top 1% saw their incomes rise by only 93% this past year. We need to get our priorities straight. Until the top 1% see their incomes rise by at least 1000%, we need to continue to urge our politicians to cut the pay of the parasitical public workers who are sponging off of all of us.

Like this comment
Posted by Mike
a resident of Highland Oaks
on Mar 7, 2012 at 2:56 pm

Good start!

Put service back into public service by removing the greed and fiscal irresponsibility.


Like this comment
Posted by Kathleen Ruegsegger
a resident of Vintage Hills
on Mar 7, 2012 at 4:33 pm

Stay golD, "In the private sector, the top 1% saw their incomes rise by only 93% this past year." Darn if we didn't already cover the fact that the top 1% also took the biggest hit during the recession, primarily because their income is locked up in investments. Your pension is investing in those companies too, you know, awful places like WalMart. The question isn't pay; it's underfunded life-time defined benefit plans.

Like this comment
Posted by Stacey
a resident of Amberwood/Wood Meadows
on Mar 7, 2012 at 9:01 pm

Stacey is a registered user.

Do the 1% live in Stockton? LOL!

Like this comment
Posted by sknywench
a resident of Amador Valley High School
on Mar 8, 2012 at 10:02 am

sknywench is a registered user.

Kathleen, its about equity.But then again, I m not sure of your point. Alot of people in the private, or rather the other 99 percent did take a big hit during the recession and not because their income is locked up in investments. They saw it in actual lost wages and increased living expenses and medical premiums (if they were lucky enough not to lose their jobs). Why should taxpayers fund benefits beyond the norm given in the private sector? That means public employees should retire consistent with social security and not at 50 or 55 and still receive 80% of income plus lifetime medical. No wonder so many public employees are lacking in ability to fix problems and come up with innovative solutions. I wouldnt stick my neck out out of the herd and risk my pension benefits!

Like this comment
Posted by Pleasanton
a resident of Del Prado
on Mar 8, 2012 at 11:45 am

We should put it on the ballot here as well before we are in the same condition as Stockton and San Jose..............hmmmmmmmmmmm maybe we are already.

Like this comment
Posted by Kathleen Ruegsegger
a resident of Vintage Hills
on Mar 8, 2012 at 6:16 pm

sknywench, Just a running discussion with Salty Dog (who goes by many names out here). No argument with anything you said.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

A tax grab that likely goes no where
By Tim Hunt | 1 comment | 618 views

Nominations due Monday for TV30’s Tri-Valley ‘Coach of the Year’ award
By Jeb Bing | 0 comments | 191 views


Readers' Choice Ballot is here

It's time to decide what local business is worthy of the title "Pleasanton Readers' Choice" — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 21st. Stay tuned for the results in the June 23rd issue of the Pleasanton Weekly.