Town Square

Post a New Topic

Did David Harmer accept a bailout of his own?

Original post made by Warner, Birdland, on May 26, 2010

Web Link

By Michael Fitzgerald
Record Columnist

Republican congressional candidate David Harmer denounces bailouts, the stimulus package and Obamacare. But did he accept a bailout of his own?

Harmer, a small-government conservative, is vying for the Republican nomination to run against Rep. Jerry McNerney, D-Pleasanton, in the 11th congressional district.

At his Stockton breakfast, as most campaign stops, Harmer blasted "the so-called stimulus that has not stimulated anything but government spending and federal debt."

Declared Harmer, "We're disgusted by it."

Harmer's brush with the bailout was more than ideological. Before flipping his hat into the ring for the 11th District seat, he worked for Washington Mutual.

An attorney, Harmer worked ensuring WaMu complied with federal credit regulations.

WaMu went belly-up in the mortgage meltdown. The bank was acquired by JPMorgan Chase.

JPMorgan Chase received $25 billion in federal bailout money from the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP.

JPMorgan Chase laid Harmer off.

Harmer received a $75,406 bonus.

He also received $84,586 in severance, according to his federal financial disclosure forms.

Harmer's foes interpret events this way: Harmer, who denounces bailouts, received a hefty severance - of bailout money. Harmer is guilty of hypocrisy.

Harmer's camp says this interpretation is wrong.

WaMu never took a penny of bailout money, said Harmer's spokesman, Tim Clark.

JPMorgan Chase took it, Clark said. But the financial giant didn't need it. Witness the fact JPMorgan was one of the first to repay the U.S. Treasury in full, Clark said.

"JPMorgan Chase is one of the healthiest, financially sound institutions on the planet," Clark said. "They did not need nor did they want TARP bailout money."

U.S. leaders, striving to calm the financial markets, lavished TARP money over needy and not-needy institutions alike, Clark said.

"The whole bailout process was flawed, and it was bad government, and it should have never happened," Clark said.

As for Harmer's bonus and severance, "Whatever David was paid by JPMorgan came from JPMorgan," and not taxpayers, "because it was a very healthy financial institution."

JPMorgan Chase had a credit regulation compliance division of its own. Harmer's division became redundant.

As far as the bonus, "It's compensation for work done - for a good job done ensuring the banks comply with the consumer protection," Clark said.

"We are conservatives," Clark said. "We believe in rewarding those who excel and get the job done."

Harmer, who earned $485,779 over the previous five quarters, and who lists hundreds of thousands of dollars in assets, then applied for unemployment compensation.

He took $2,395 in unemployment, his records say.

"He's paid into the system," Clark said.

To my mind, the critics who raised the issues about Harmer's compensation are missing the bigger point.

Whether or not Harmer was wrong to take the money, WaMu's failure also was the failure of unrestrained free-market capitalism.

Washington Mutual undid itself by reckless and predatory lending. Seeking to become "the Walmart of lenders," the bank went after lower-income borrowers, buying Providian and other subprime lenders.

It plunged greedily into a dubious market with products such as high-fee Adjustable Rate Mortgages. The result was the biggest bank failure in U.S. history. Legions of borrowers lost their homes. Shareholders were wiped out. The whole country was sucked into recession.

A good question for the four Republican candidates for the 11th District seat is whether they believe government has a role to play in regulating financial markets.

Harmer supports regulatory reform, but contends Democrats are perpetuating the problem by continuing to hold that some banks and big companies are "too big to fail."

Harmer would not only let private companies suffer the consequences of bad decisions, he wants to abolish Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, federal mortgage corporations that buy and securitize mortgages.

"He says we need to get taxpayers off the hook," Clark said.

That's all very well - unless you believe Harmer himself was bailed out.

Comments (6)

Like this comment
Posted by radical
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 26, 2010 at 2:28 pm

OK Line up! Alright then some bad news--the largest bank in the US has bought us out, you are all redundant, now then, I want everyone who wants the severance pay you are owed under company policy to take one step forward!

everyone who has four small kids and a wife -- and didn't take a step -- can go ahead and criticize Harmer

Like this comment
Posted by Megan
a resident of Del Prado
on May 26, 2010 at 9:09 pm

David Harmer = Typical Conservative Hypocrite

Like this comment
Posted by Patriot
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 26, 2010 at 9:57 pm

Oh this is too sad to be funny. This guy is for bailouts for himself, but not the rest of us.

Like this comment
Posted by Cholo
a resident of Livermore
on May 26, 2010 at 10:23 pm


Like this comment
Posted by steve
a resident of Parkside
on May 27, 2010 at 10:47 am

So you leftist dolts are against severence pay and unemployment payouts for laid off employees? In most cases, we pay into the funding of these support plans through our personal, payroll and corp. taxes.
If the govt props up Social Security with a bailout, will you and the officials you support not collect retirement funds.
Go on supporting the current incumbent who is so far up Pelosi's ... he can't see the light of day. Bail him out!

Like this comment
Posted by Cholo
a resident of Livermore
on May 27, 2010 at 11:55 am

You BETCHA a repub. can be trusted: Web Link


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Salami, Salami … Baloney
By Tom Cushing | 25 comments | 582 views

Time for new collaboration between city and school district
By Tim Hunt | 2 comments | 458 views