Town Square

Post a New Topic

Letters: Pleasanton 2010 or Chicago 1930?

Original post made on May 21, 2010

Dear Editor,

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, May 21, 2010, 12:00 AM

Comments (2)

Like this comment
Posted by Stacey
a resident of Amberwood/Wood Meadows
on May 21, 2010 at 7:43 am

Stacey is a registered user.

Responsible voters will judge the project on the pros and cons of the project itself, not upon the personalities of those involved on either side.


Like this comment
Posted by anonymous
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 21, 2010 at 8:07 am

The developers filed a suit because of the lack of information and the use of misinformation on a project that had been vetted for four years and approved by a 4-1 council. It was their third development plan. The people who are against this will be against this no matter what this developer does. PP was designed to stop this particular project. There is virtually no other property in Pleasanton to which it applies. It was a political ploy.

Do you know who is paying for No on D? Both sides should be held accountable.

Vote on the merits of the measure. This area is zoned rural residential and will have development on it. The people who are in the forefront of the no campaign either have personal or political motivation NOT the interest of the people of Pleasanton.

Read about this and then go see the property. It is surrounded by homes. From First Street, turn up on Bernal away from town and then take a right on Hearst and go to the top. It will be crystal clear to you what this is about!

Vote yes on D


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

The valley needs strong leadership on BART board
By Tim Hunt | 3 comments | 5,788 views

3 Great Ways to Showcase Your Strengths on College Applications!
By Elizabeth LaScala | 0 comments | 436 views

10th year tribute to Laurel Williams set for Friday
By Jeb Bing | 1 comment | 237 views