Town Square

Post a New Topic

Education Mandates: Overhauling a Broken System

Original post made by Stacey, Amberwood/Wood Meadows, on Feb 4, 2010

New report from the Legislative Analysts Office on California's broken education funding system: Web Link

Continuing to defer mandate costs while avoiding substantive mandate reform has several negative consequences. For school districts and community colleges, deferral means still having to perform hundreds of activities, which are often of little benefit to students, even amid steep budget cuts. Mandates also allow districts and community colleges without justification to claim very different amounts for performing the same activities. For the state, deferral means the debt owed to schools will grow steeply and, without substantive reform, most mandated policies likely will continue to be implemented ineffectively and inefficiently.

We recommend comprehensively reforming K–14 mandates. If a mandate serves a purpose fundamental to the education system, such as protecting student health or providing essential assessment and oversight data, it should be funded. If not, the mandate should be eliminated. Taken as a whole, our reform package would relieve school districts and community colleges of performing hundreds of activities that provide little value to students while providing them with adequate and timely compensation for the activities still required of them. In addition, comprehensively reforming mandates would reduce the state’s annual obligations by more than $350 million—funds that could be saved or allocated to districts for higher priorities.

Also see Web Link

Comments (1)

Like this comment
Posted by June
a resident of Alisal Elementary School
on Feb 5, 2010 at 10:13 am

In these tough economic times, getting back to the basics of education (reading, writing, mathematics) as well as programs to protect health and provide assessment and services as indicated above seem to us to be the priority funding. When the economy improves, we can expand spending to the other programs and in the meantime we hope more a sustainable and equitable funding mechanisms other than basing school revenue on new construction fees and parcel taxes in the most affluent communities will be implemented.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

The valley needs strong leadership on BART board
By Tim Hunt | 1 comment | 1,098 views

A good year for Pleasanton; 2018 could be even better
By Jeb Bing | 0 comments | 685 views