Town Square

Post a New Topic

Pleasanton's Leadership Crisis: Why We Must Take Action Now

Original post made by Dean Wallace, Stoneridge, on Aug 15, 2023

Pleasanton is at an unmistakable crossroads. Some of you may know that I recently ran for City Council and lost to my opponent -- fair and square. There's no sugarcoating the election results, but that hasn't dimmed my passion for this city or my concerns about its future. And since then, as I watch this current City Council continue to make poor decision after poor decision, my view that the City of Pleasanton is in dire need of a change in leadership has only continued to grow.

As I pen this piece from my 525-square-foot apartment near Stoneridge Mall, for which I pay a staggering $2,230 monthly -- and am facing a close to 10% increase in my rent come September -- I'm acutely reminded every single day of the wider housing affordability crisis in today's inflationary environment. The urgency for our elected leaders to prioritize fiscal prudence has never been clearer. They must act to prevent further burdens on Pleasanton residents.

A Leadership Disconnected:

There's an undeniable sense that our city's leadership is drifting away from the everyday experiences and struggles of Pleasanton residents. Although the median age of the Pleasanton City Council is 63, the issue isn't age -- it's about having a Council attuned to the needs, with empathy and an inclusive vision. We need leadership that represents the broad diversity of Pleasanton's residents. When you gaze up at the dais of our City Council, and turn to see the leadership of City staff at Council meetings, the lack of diversity is glaring. Is it any wonder they're out of touch?

Just consider the stark contrast in some of their most recent decisions: self-awarding pay raises for city officials — the Mayor, Council, City Manager, and City Attorney -- while delaying a much-needed contract for our hardworking police officers. And look at the ease with which they approve costly vanity projects in our city's budget, while dealing with increasing costs for city services, and passing on those costs in the form of increased fees to Pleasanton's residents.

And the incredibly understaffed, and under-resourced City staff -- for which there are an incredible number of vacancies -- from the bottom up -- shows that investing and hiring isn't something our City Manager sees as a priority. Instead, he turns -- time after time -- to more and more expensive outside consulting firms to complete minor, and complex tasks. Tasks that our City should be able to handle in-house. In fact, at tonight's City Council meeting they're voting on over $1.5M in contracts for external consulting -- which is absurd amidst our city's more pressing financial needs. Our City's leadership appears to rubber-stamp any proposal for increased spending unless it's for our police department, which requires resources to ensure our city remains safe. These actions reveal a disconcerting trend of skewed priorities and fiscal recklessness.

The Water Rate Debacle:

Let's dissect the PFAS and water rate crises as glaring examples of our City's incoherent policy moves. While reservoirs around the Bay Area are full and drought restrictions have been lifted, Pleasanton's leadership persists in leaving open the option of sourcing water from those wells tainted with PFAS, chemicals that endure indefinitely in our environment. This contrasts sharply with their stances during the last electoral campaign season, when both the Mayor and current Council majority expressed grave concerns about PFAS in our water.

And the City's communication regarding the proposed water rate hikes? They can be described as muddled at best, purposely confusing at worst. For example, they described the rate hikes as "an average increase of about $33 every other month during the first year," for a "30% increase this year, followed by another 20% increase beginning Jan. 1, 2025, and a 12% increase the year after." Yet, when you get past the confusing rhetoric, the numbers do not lie. When you do the math, and compound the percentage rate increases (as they will occur independently after previous increases), by the end of 2026 the average Pleasanton household will see their annual water bill skyrocket by a staggering 74.72% — an increase of about $500 annually. Do the City Manager, Mayor, and the City Council majority think the residents of Pleasanton are incapable of crunching the numbers? Such a hike is not a minor rate adjustment; it's a significant financial burden and a blatant display of failed leadership.

Police and Infrastructure -- Where's the Priority?

In the midst of all this mismanagement, our police officers -- vital to our community's fabric and safety -- have been operating without a contract for over 75 days. Why are raises for city officials pushed through swiftly while our police officers linger in uncertainty? Likewise, essential infrastructure projects, like the ongoing saga of the Costco road, are consistently pushed aside due to staffing and contracting challenges (i.e. further mismanagement). And yet, the city seems to always find funds for external consultants. A looming possibility of new taxes and bonds to address a need of up to $900 million further intensifies concerns. Despite the undeniable infrastructure needs of our city, can we genuinely trust the current leadership with such vast funds, especially considering their track record?

A Call to Action:

Our role as informed citizens is evident. Facing a dysfunctional City Council that favors vanity projects and external consultants over the genuine needs of Pleasanton, we must amplify our concerns. Councilmember Jack Balch, one of the few who genuinely grasps the city's pressing issues, desperately needs allies. The upcoming City Council meetings on August 15th and September 19th will be critical junctures. We must seize these opportunities, speaking out against this dysfunctional City Council, and advocate for change by November 2024. The time to step up is now. Tonight's City Council meeting is our first opportunity to voice our concerns.

Comments (5)

Posted by MsVic
a resident of Mission Park
on Aug 15, 2023 at 9:51 am

MsVic is a registered user.

Excellent written piece capturing the ineffective leadership of our council majority. I’ll be at the meeting and my voice will heard.

Posted by Michael Austin
a resident of Pleasanton Meadows
on Aug 15, 2023 at 5:23 pm

Michael Austin is a registered user.

I agree.

It has been my opinion, Pleasanton current four vote, council majority is destroying this city. That there is a definitive disconnect, in that this majority council is throwing money away on a skate park, an old house, and in the same breath, amassing their spin to convince Pleasanton residents that this city must take on massive debt to pay for infrastructure.

Money thrown at the skate park and the old house would cover the costs of all infrastructure requirements. Reverse the money direction, stop your attempt to raise water rates to pay debt you are creating. Do not punish those of us that have conserved water last five years.

And Valerie Arkin, you sit there on the council and lie, when you state you answer all emails from residents. You do not.

Posted by MichaelB
a resident of Pleasanton Meadows
on Aug 15, 2023 at 7:18 pm

MichaelB is a registered user.

"Our City's leadership appears to rubber-stamp any proposal for increased spending unless it's for our police department, which requires resources to ensure our city remains safe. These actions reveal a disconcerting trend of skewed priorities and fiscal recklessness."

Time to start questioning if the council wants the police to have resources to keep city residents safe. Or just wants to follow the latest left-wing fad of "defund" and "reimagine" - because they think the police are the problem.

The department had nothing to do with George Floyd, yet the council caved to protestors and created an "advisory board" for mental health and use of force issues. Can you guess what the "advisory board" is going to do? Criticize the actions of officers and/or come up with new ways to reduce their involvement.

Some of us are not buying the feel-good, misguided argument that everyone law enforcement comes in contact with and/or is taken into custody either "needs help" and/or is a "victim" that is being singled out because of race, nationality, etc. We're seeing the results now. Politicians are decriminalizing behaviors. Smash and grab robberies are more frequent because criminals know there are no consequences. And Pamela Price seems more concerned about the race of those arrested vs. holding people accountable and keeping communities safe.

Web Link

Posted by Janet P.
a resident of Jensen Tract
on Aug 16, 2023 at 11:19 am

Janet P. is a registered user.

I attended last night's meeting. My son spoke in support of our PPOA. The room was full of concerned citizens who care and understand. But, as one woman said there last night, it seems everyone on the City Council except Jack Balch are not listening. They pretend to listen, but their actions speak louder than their words. How about we start electing some police officers, their families, or retired cops. That would be a good start to fix things. Most of the speakers would do a better job. It is very sad.

Posted by PtownRes
a resident of Birdland
on Aug 17, 2023 at 8:00 am

PtownRes is a registered user.

SimpleArkin and Mayor Brown are up for reelection in 2024. Vote them out and let's turn this city around with competent representatives on the City Council.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

Premiere! “I Do I Don’t: How to build a better marriage” – Here, a page/weekday
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,586 views

Community foundations want to help local journalism survive
By Tim Hunt | 20 comments | 1,174 views


Support local families in need

Your contribution to the Pleasanton Weekly Holiday Fund will go directly to nonprofits supporting local families and children in need. Last year, Pleasanton Weekly readers contributed over $83,000 to support eight safety-net nonprofits right here in the Tri-Valley.