Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, March 2, 2023, 10:09 PM
Town Square
Around the Valley: Growing list of illogical decisions
Original post made on Mar 3, 2023
Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, March 2, 2023, 10:09 PM
Comments (5)
a resident of Birdland
on Mar 3, 2023 at 11:01 am
Joe V is a registered user.
This decision also impacts downtown businesses, the new park concept would bring more people downtown. With their vote, the City Council showed it prioritizes a quiet downtown over a thriving one.
a resident of Pleasanton Valley
on Mar 3, 2023 at 6:41 pm
Pleasanton Valley Rez is a registered user.
Such a shame. I was shocked with the decision made. A disappointment to our lovely downtown.
a resident of Birdland
on Mar 4, 2023 at 8:21 am
PtownRes is a registered user.
The majority of the council who voted to dump this project - Testa, Nibert, Arkin and Mayor Brown - are being illogical in many of their decisions. I believe the All Abilities Playground, the Skate Park and now Lions Wayside/Delucchi renovations are all on hold. And the one project they are funding is the Century House. A project that will cost millions to renovate a house that even the historical registry does not find worthy of being on the list. So disappointing - these members are so short sided and not helping Pleasanton move into the future. Time for new leadership in 2024.
a resident of Stoneridge
on Mar 4, 2023 at 3:44 pm
Jeff Nibert is a registered user.
Two votes were taken. The first was on my motion to accept the staff recommendation to finalize the update of the master plan. That motion failed, 2-3. The second vote was on a motion for staff to prepare a cost estimate for a less-costly renovation of the parks, which passed, 4-1.
a resident of Vintage Hills
on Mar 4, 2023 at 6:08 pm
keeknlinda is a registered user.
It would have been nice if you had stuck by your guns when the 2nd vote came, Councilmember Nibert. It still would have passed, but we'd have known that doing the right thing was more important to you than being on the majority side of the vote.
No public input was a shameful suggestion. Minimal public input is an insult to the many residents who treasure and use the parks.
Don't miss out
on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.
Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.
See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.
Stay informed.
Get the day's top headlines from PleasantonWeekly.com sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.
Bad consequences can follow bad decisions in Pleasanton
By Tim Hunt | 1 comment | 1,196 views
The sticker shock from electricity bills
By Monith Ilavarasan | 11 comments | 1,065 views
2023 guide to summer camps
Looking for something for the kids to do this summer, learn something new and have fun? The Summer Camp Guide features local camps for all ages and interests.