Town Square

Post a New Topic

Local agencies react after state bans watering of non-residential, non-functional turf

Original post made on Jun 23, 2022

Tri-Valley water agencies recommend non-residential property owners convert to smarter lawns and low-water landscaping, following the California State Water Resources Control Board's new emergency water conservation regulation.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, June 22, 2022, 3:44 PM

Comments (4)

Posted by Carol Withers
a resident of Jensen Tract
on Jun 23, 2022 at 9:49 am

Carol Withers is a registered user.

We are in a dire situation with water. Why are our tri-cities still building? Our Governor is forcing low income housing on us. In the valley only expensive track homes are going up.


Posted by BobB
a resident of Vintage Hills
on Jun 23, 2022 at 10:51 am

BobB is a registered user.

@Carol Withers,

More housing would help with lowering prices, not increase them.

Nimbys are blocking projects to increase water supply through desalination, storage, and recycling. The so-called water crisis is off our own making. We have currently available technology to make plenty of water available for all our homes and new housing projects. Both.


Posted by Barbara Costello
a resident of Highland Oaks
on Jun 23, 2022 at 11:45 am

Barbara Costello is a registered user.

@BobB - are you delusional? How does adding more homes lower water needs? Desalination plants are needed but the activist environmentalists won't allow those projects. At some point, it needs to be recognized that our power grid is never going to be sustained by wind and solar, and we aren't going to cement our way out of drought by building high-rise condos with no lawns. 30 years of Democratic control in California and the state has been destroyed.


Posted by BobB
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Jun 23, 2022 at 12:05 pm

BobB is a registered user.

@Barbara Costello,

I said it would help with prices, not with water usage. We should start with recycling water because it's practical and easier than desalination.

It isn't environmentalist who are blocking recycling, it's nimby's. There is easily enough water if we do that to build new housing.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from PleasantonWeekly.com sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

E-Bikes on Open Space Trails: Yes or No?
By Sherry Listgarten | 17 comments | 4,988 views

Gifts and Belongings
By Chandrama Anderson | 2 comments | 2,055 views

A short honeymoon for new Pleasanton city manager?
By Tim Hunt | 2 comments | 1,152 views

Return to office
By Monith Ilavarasan | 0 comments | 548 views

 

Meet the winners!

The Pleasanton Weekly is proud to unveil this year's Readers' Choice recipients and Hall of Fame honorees.

READ MORE