Town Square

Post a New Topic

PUSD board wants to proceed with reviewing plans to move district operations off Bernal site

Original post made on May 6, 2022

The discussion about setting up the Pleasanton Unified School District property on the edge of downtown for future redevelopment could be moving to the next stage soon. The Board of Trustees expressed interest in a conceptual plan...

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, May 4, 2022, 5:17 PM

Comments (8)

Posted by Pleasant Pleasanton
a resident of Downtown
on May 6, 2022 at 12:47 pm

Pleasant Pleasanton is a registered user.

This type of housing project proposal on the school district property will be a nightmare to those who live in the downtown area. It will add to the horrible traffic burden which already exists on 1st street and surrounding residential streets (including cut through speeding traffic), and also have the potential of overflow parking in the neighborhoods adjacent to this project.

The downtown infrastructure can’t support this type of project. What happened to the idea of adding housing near Bart which is not only close to transit but freeway access?


Posted by My opinion
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 12, 2022 at 6:17 pm

My opinion is a registered user.

If they are selling the land that Village HS is on will they be closing the school permanently? That alone could get my vote for this project. Those kids do so much damage to homes and yards in the area it would be a blessing to have the school closed.


Posted by Kathleen Ruegsegger
a resident of Vintage Hills
on May 13, 2022 at 6:19 am

Kathleen Ruegsegger is a registered user.

No, My opinion, Village would also move to the business park.


Posted by SHale99
a resident of Village High School
on May 14, 2022 at 10:18 am

SHale99 is a registered user.

my opinion a portion of the DO land will be sold and those proceeds will rebuilt a new Village HS on the remaining property. Only option that doesn't require voter approval.


Posted by Kathleen Ruegsegger
a resident of Vintage Hills
on May 14, 2022 at 11:24 am

Kathleen Ruegsegger is a registered user.

Sorry about the error. This makes less sense.


Posted by SHale99
a resident of Village High School
20 hours ago

SHale99 is a registered user.

having a HS in a business park (office building) makes no sense as well. DOA


Posted by Kathleen Ruegsegger
a resident of Vintage Hills
20 hours ago

Kathleen Ruegsegger is a registered user.

I’m not certain it makes no sense, but selling only part of the DO and then moving students to portables or some other configuration doesn’t make sense either. What kind of housing could be built next to this school?

Village was/is a caring environment with great teachers. The students deserve something better, something to be proud of, no matter how they ended up there. Being in better surroundings in the business park is better than portables. We shouldn’t have any students in portables.


Posted by Get the Facts
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
9 hours ago

Get the Facts is a registered user.

To My Opinion:

Really? You maybe should get to know what really happens at Village. These are kids who need extra help, and get it from a very caring staff. Many that graduate from Village would not be able to graduate from Amador or Foothill, yet they walk away with a diploma. "It would be a blessing if the school closed"? Shame on you. Move to another area if you think these kids are so destructive. And since it appears that you have no idea if these are Village students causing "so much damage", maybe call the cops when damage is happening?

I am a teacher at another school and over the years numerous students of mine have later ended up at Village getting the help they need. This school is an absolute asset to this district and city. I am disappointed in your narrow viewpoint and assumption of vandalism.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from PleasantonWeekly.com sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

We need stable, climate-forward land use policies
By Sherry Listgarten | 2 comments | 2,079 views

Master’s in Media Studies and Communications: Five Questions to Ask Yourself
By Elizabeth LaScala | 0 comments | 1,100 views

Use Your Words!
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,018 views

Honoring exceptional Tri-Valley students
By Tim Hunt | 0 comments | 978 views

Made in home
By Monith Ilavarasan | 0 comments | 783 views

 

The Pleasanton Weekly Readers' Choice contest is here

It's time once again to cast your vote for the best places to eat, drink, shop and spend time in Pleasanton. Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 22. Stay tuned for the results in the June 24 issue of the Pleasanton Weekly.

VOTE HERE