Town Square

Post a New Topic

Five-story, mixed-use development proposed on edge of downtown Pleasanton

Original post made on Oct 27, 2021

A five-story, mixed-use building on Harrison Street in downtown Pleasanton that could potentially bypass traditional local review has been proposed by a Southern California-based developer.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, October 26, 2021, 9:06 PM

Comments (11)

Posted by Margo
a resident of Hacienda Gardens
on Oct 27, 2021 at 9:50 am

Margo is a registered user.

This is not appropriate anywhere in our downtown. Our downtown already has inappropriate buildings that were approved by the previous council that were in bed with the developers.

Posted by George Withers
a resident of Jensen Tract
on Oct 27, 2021 at 10:13 am

George Withers is a registered user.

You have to be out of your mind to think this is good idea!! Take a look at the the ugly development at the West end of Livermore's First Street. It's kind of like taking a Large Elephant to the Small Dog Park!! It's just not a good idea!!
Please don't approved this!!!

Posted by ddclausen
a resident of Old Towne
on Oct 27, 2021 at 12:41 pm

ddclausen is a registered user.

I agree that this is not a good plan. If this is built, existing landowners in the area would try to cash in and then the downtown character would be lost forever. We don’t need another Dublin downtown. Our city’s planners have up till now taken special attention to maintaining our downtown.

Posted by dknute
a resident of Golden Eagle
on Oct 27, 2021 at 1:57 pm

dknute is a registered user.

The City Council would have to be living on another planet to even consider a project like this. Parking? Really? Should not parking for a project like this be part and parcel? Five stories? Really? Consider the eyesore this would create, if nothing else. No! A resounding no.
Should be a quick study and a No vote!

Posted by David
a resident of Walnut Grove Elementary School
on Oct 27, 2021 at 4:36 pm

David is a registered user.

@Margo. I'm new to the area. Can you provide or point to information about how the former council was in bed with developers? I'm very curious about this.

Posted by CarolWithers
a resident of Jensen Tract
on Oct 28, 2021 at 11:37 am

CarolWithers is a registered user.

Bad idea. Who is going to shop at these tiny boutiques on first floors. That structure will cause a domino effect. Please rethink this.

Posted by George Withers
a resident of Jensen Tract
on Oct 29, 2021 at 9:48 am

George Withers is a registered user.

Can someone post an Architectural Scale Drawing to show what this 5 Story Building would look like, along with all the single story homes in this area?

Posted by buklau
a resident of Avila
on Oct 29, 2021 at 1:14 pm

buklau is a registered user.

Time to turn downtown into what BART did to the Stoneridge Mall!!

Posted by BobB
a resident of Vintage Hills Elementary School
on Oct 30, 2021 at 11:19 am

BobB is a registered user.

I don't get why people seem to oppose any kind of development at all (except maybe senior centers). I know it's a NIMBY thing, but I wish Pleasanton downtown was a little more like Livermore. I don't know if this building would be such a bad thing. I think our downtown is a bit drab. Time to move on from "historical".

Posted by 50YearsHere
a resident of Pleasanton Heights
on Oct 31, 2021 at 12:46 pm

50YearsHere is a registered user.

Does a project like this conform to the recently updated Downtown Specific Plan? If not, problem solved... If it does, then this is the direction our leaders want Downtown to go...

Posted by Jeff Nibert
a resident of Stoneridge
on Nov 8, 2021 at 5:49 pm

Jeff Nibert is a registered user.

According to the article, the City of Pleasanton under the 4-year-old state law, "shall not impose any maximum controls on density and the applicant shall also receive a height increase of up to three additional stories, or 33 feet" for development projects built within a one-half mile of public transit. This means that if a developer checks all the boxes in the law, the city MUST approve it, regardless of the city leaders’ positions. This is another example of the state of California imposing a spate of “one size fits all” housing laws.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

McNerney hangs it up after eight terms
By Tim Hunt | 14 comments | 1,030 views

Is Watching Porn Considered to be Cheating?
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,023 views

How to Write an SOP
By Elizabeth LaScala | 0 comments | 460 views