Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

A design scheme for the new fourth/fifth grade school that’s being planned on a portion of the Donlon Elementary School site will be brought to the Pleasanton Unified School District Board of Trustees for possible approval this week.

Conceptual renderings of the proposal will be presented during the board’s regular meeting on Tuesday night, beginning at 7 p.m. in the PUSD administration headquarters, 4556 Bernal Ave.

Since December 2018, the trustees and administrators have developed plans and a $49.5 million budget for a separate school site at Donlon — currently called “E10,” as the district’s 10th elementary campus — that will exclusively serve about 500 students in grades 4-5.

The existing Donlon school will convert to a K-3 school with a projected enrollment of about 700 students. PUSD spokesman Patrick Gannon told the Weekly that the entire site’s capacity will increase to approximately 1,200 students when the new school is completed.

The new school will face the corner of Denker Drive and Payne Road, on the backside of the existing Donlon campus, and will be separated by a large playfield.

Five buildings will be constructed including three classroom buildings with shared collaborative spaces, counseling offices and a staff lounge. Administrative offices and student services such as a library and media center, multipurpose room, music room, and covered lunch area will be housed in two other structures.

The E10 Elementary School Committee, which includes a spectrum of PUSD staff and Donlon families and neighbors, worked with Campbell-based Sugimura Finney Architects to come up with the E10 design concept last year.

Measure I1 bond revenue will fund the project, which does not include an additional $6.34 million for traffic mitigation or the kids club expansion cost in the budget at this time. If the project passes this week, it will move into design development before being submitted for review to the Division of State Architect by fall.

Groundbreaking is scheduled for summer 2021, with the school opening for the 2022-23 school year. Gannon said students may need to be temporarily relocated while construction is underway but that the district will “work to minimize impacts for our school communities.”

In other business

* A presentation and hearing will be held at Tuesday’s meeting to discuss possibly implementing an online monitoring program intended for student safety, according to PUSD.

With online learning becoming more common, administrators said they “have a need to ensure that students are safe in these spaces” and will consider “24/7 real-time computer-based and human monitoring” as a potential solution.

“Students engage in a variety of online activities that can provide indicators of thoughts or intentions to participate in behaviors that are unsafe to themselves or other students,” district staff wrote in a report. “There are now solutions available that can routinely monitor student activity in district-provided learning spaces to identify these types of online behaviors and interactions.

A committee of PUSD staff and community members will explore using two services called Gaggle and Securly for monitoring district-issued Google accounts “to identify activity patterns that could indicate that a student is considering harm to self or others.”

Flagged activity would be reviewed by a person to help “determine appropriate response based on a risk assessment,” with individual communication protocols for various risk scenarios.

Money for the pilot program has been allocated from the Sycamore tech fund. The committee will start meeting next month and is expected to give its recommendation to the Board in March.

* The Board will receive results from the district’s spring 2019 “Physical Fitness Test” (PFT) on Tuesday.

The California Department of Education requires that all public school students in grades 5, 7 and 9 take the PFT. Six areas of fitness are tested including aerobic capacity, body composition, abdominal strength and endurance, trunk extensor strength and flexibility, upper body strength and endurance, and overall flexibility.

* Among the consent agenda items pending Board action on Tuesday evening is a proposed $48,282 contract with Dale Butterworth Pools to replace two diving boards and stands at Foothill High School that “are beyond use and are unsafe,” according to PUSD.

The replacements will be paid by the general fund and are being expedited for completion before the swimming season starts. Plans are also underway to replace the remaining diving boards at Foothill and Amador Valley; bidding for that project will take place this summer.

* The trustees will also vote on a $27,945 service contract with REC Solar for recently completed work to seal coat temporary parking spaces in the Amador Valley parking lot facing Santa Rita Road.

Last summer workers built several new solar panel structures and reconfigured the parking lot as part of a Prop 39 funded project to help the district save on energy costs. The contract will be paid from the deferred maintenance fund.

* A ceremony honoring recipients of this year’s Dreammakers and Risktakers Award will happen at the start of Tuesday’s meeting. Hosted by the Innovation Tri-Valley Leadership Group, the annual awards “salutes student innovators from the Tri-Valley region whose ideas hold the promise to change the world” and “who are innovating the future as they fearlessly pursue their dreams.”

Join the Conversation

No comments

  1. This whole “E10” is such a disaster. Building a 4-5 elementary is not going to do anything to help with overcrowding except for creating more traffic in an already congested area. And now you’re going to displace current Donlon students during construction? Are you kidding me? Where are they going to go…when there’s apparently no room anywhere else. Oh that’s right, there is room and this would be have been taken care of if they just would have redrawn the boundaries 7 years ago when they realized that this was going to happen.

  2. I don’t think “annoyed” is the right name for this project…I think “disgusted and pissed-off” would be a more appropriate monicker. The traffic is bad now, it will be even worse during construction, and it will be at it’s peak when the school is open. And yet there are residents living right here in Val Vista who think that the Costco project is going to create more of a traffic problem for Val Vista than the Donlon expansion…can’t figure that logic out. I guess this pretty much kills the “great school system increases property values” argument. If I was living on Denker or Payne I would get that “for sale” sign out there before construction starts and stick some poor unsuspecting “newby”.

  3. I am really disappointed with this solution.

    That said, I really hope the district can articulate a future roadmap and help the community understand how this fits into that roadmap…..seems like a bandaid on top of other bandaids.

    Also…..why is the district prioritizing diving board replacement over the other “emotional” levers they are using to justify measure M “Mo money”? if there is damaged roofing or electrical outlets that require immediate remediation it seems irresponsible to replace a diving board if funds are available over fixing a classroom safety issue?

  4. PP, at least we got solar to go to those outlets!

    All the priorities are out of whack. Lydiksen first—a school they admitted last night on the webinar was not looked at for possible remodeling rather than a tear down. Fences and Chromebooks instead of capacity or roofing and HVAC.

  5. Dear annoyed, disgusted and pissed off: whatever the solution selected, it’s a given that not everyone will be happy. But solutions are needed. So please move on to solutions instead of finger pointing and petty venting. If there wasn’t such a pathetic imbalance of parent involvement vs parent complaining in this district, you might have a point. But you don’t.

  6. Parent…ya, right…”whatever the solution selected, its a given that not everyone will be happy”. Good point except that this is not a solution and nobody is happy. The solution is simple and it has always been there, BUILD A NEW SCHOOL. They won’t listen and so people complain. Seems to me that you are doing a bit of finger pointing and venting yourself. And what was your point?

  7. Because this is grass roots effort, those who oppose have set up a web site, measurement.org and I believe there is a downloadable sign. No donations are being accepted, so there is no money for signs. There are a lot of links to district docs and other information there as well.

    There is a video of the district webinar. Worth watching because the superintendent, in a long answer, does not commit to a new high school. https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=QtOHDDpr9HI&app=desktop

  8. Thanks KR…measurem.org…good information that I’m sure PUSD hates is out there. Download the flyer and email them to friends and family. Save paper, ink and reach a wider audience.

Leave a comment