Town Square

Post a New Topic

Pleasanton: City manager receives 12% raise, city attorney gets 8%

Original post made on Aug 22, 2019

City Manager Nelson Fialho earned a 12% salary increase and city attorney Daniel Sodergren an 8% raise on Tuesday, with the council citing glowing performance reviews and a need to bring both employees' pay closer to market averages.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, August 22, 2019, 4:53 PM

Comments (17)

10 people like this
Posted by Michael Austin
a resident of Pleasanton Meadows
on Aug 22, 2019 at 7:52 pm

Nelson Fialho is under paid with the $255,452.

8 people like this
Posted by Andy
a resident of Bridle Creek
on Aug 23, 2019 at 11:19 am

Ths is WAY TOO MUCH money for these guys. How many residents living in Pleasanton received that much %ge raise last year or year before that or even in last 5 years in their job. SHAME on Pleasanton! Pleasanton people will react negatively to this news. We need to do something. This is the reason everything is getting expenses in pleasanton.

4 people like this
Posted by Ridgerunner
a resident of Pleasanton Heights
on Aug 23, 2019 at 12:49 pm

Vote the city council out of office

18 people like this
Posted by Kathleen Ruegsegger
a resident of Vintage Hills
on Aug 23, 2019 at 1:34 pm

Kathleen Ruegsegger is a registered user.

From this story: “In the city manager's case, he voluntarily passed on raises in prior years during and after the recession to help ensure the city's fiscal stability, according to Thorne. As a result, his salary level has been the lowest for city managers in the Tri-Valley, and pay increases for all other Pleasanton city employee groups have outpaced Fialho's, including top-tier management positions directly below him.” I’m not sure if it is fair to forego raises and then not hope to catch up later. However, these gentlemen are paid below neighboring cities, and I believe even the superintendent of our schools—$298,225 Web Link We certainly can debate whether we are paying these people too much in general.

You can find what any civil servant is making at this website: Here is the link to the city’s employees: Web Link The data comes directly from the entities. Pension liabilities, I believe, may be a general estimate.

9 people like this
Posted by James Michael
a resident of Val Vista
on Aug 23, 2019 at 8:37 pm

James Michael is a registered user.

I don't see a problem with raises in salary or wages for employees that are doing the job. The problem is the 3% at 50 retirement that Gov. Davis stuck us with all those years ago.

3 people like this
Posted by Pleasanton Parent
a resident of Pleasanton Meadows
on Aug 23, 2019 at 9:33 pm

I dont get why pensions get col and bonus increases. Or why we baseline pension payments based on the last yrs salary.

Taxpayers getting raped

6 people like this
Posted by James Michael
a resident of Val Vista
on Aug 24, 2019 at 10:15 am

James Michael is a registered user.

No, it's not rape if the taxpayers give their consent. And that's exactly what they do each time they keep voting for the same party that started this madness.

15 people like this
Posted by Grumpy
a resident of Vineyard Avenue
on Aug 24, 2019 at 3:02 pm

Grumpy is a registered user.

Wait, what's wrong with giving them raises? They're still paid way below market?

Or is it that you just don't think that the government should pay anyone who works for them? Because if that's what you think, that would be appropriate for a communist dictatorship and not a thriving capitalistic democracy.

This is America. We pay our employees so they don't leave to work for private industry. Get used to it.

6 people like this
Posted by Pleasanton Parent
a resident of Pleasanton Meadows
on Aug 24, 2019 at 10:43 pm

When schools are fundraising stating they cant pay for basic functions, then turnaround and give raises.....its a slap in the face

2 people like this
Posted by carlos
a resident of Highland Oaks
on Aug 26, 2019 at 10:55 am

If the city manager manages the city, what does the mayor do?

6 people like this
Posted by Kathleen Ruegsegger
a resident of Vintage Hills
on Aug 26, 2019 at 11:23 am

Kathleen Ruegsegger is a registered user.

Mayor is an elected position and part of the City Council (four additional members). The primary role is to oversee the City Manager and the City Attorney, set policy, and oversee the budget. You can look at agendas to see the variety of issues requiring City Council approval. I do not believe the mayor has any more authority than any individual council member. They act together as one body and votes are by majority. The idea is that the council represents community members so we have a say in what happens in our town. My contention is that city staff leads the council in the direction they wish to go. If we don’t have people on the council asking tougher questions and for deeper reporting from staff—or without feedback (positive or negative) at meetings or phone calls or email—we end up with what staff wants. Example: the push for a $200MM new city center on Bernal property and without much consideration of a joint location with the school district. It’s often the same with our elected school board members.

Did anyone consider keeping and expanding the current library, updating the police department where it is, moving the city offices and district/Village HS into new facilities on the district site? Currently, both those locations (other than the library) are eyesores.

1 person likes this
Posted by Grumpy
a resident of Vineyard Avenue
on Aug 26, 2019 at 12:20 pm

Grumpy is a registered user.

PP, I know you know that the school district is different from the city. And I'm likely to agree with you that the school district hiring has been a mess.

But the city seems to be doing pretty well, and in the places it isn't, losing staff for lack of pay won't help.

Kathleen, I agree that the whole move makes little sense. Isn't this going to be resolved by ballot though? I don't know the state of talks on collocation.

1 person likes this
Posted by Kathleen Ruegsegger
a resident of Vintage Hills
on Aug 26, 2019 at 2:26 pm

Kathleen Ruegsegger is a registered user.

I believe there has to be a vote; don’t see it going in favor of Bernal plan. I think co-location is DOA. In reality, neither side has the funds and the city has no interest. Last I heard, the city is pursuing one plan—Bernal.

1 person likes this
Posted by Diane B.
a resident of Foothill High School
on Aug 26, 2019 at 4:35 pm

Diane B. is a registered user.

These gentlemen are doing fantastic jobs and we need to pay them what they deserve. I retired from the corporate world and in order to retain the best, they need to be compensated! All of us love our P-Town, well let’s give credit to our chief executives that make it a wonderful place to live!!!

1 person likes this
Posted by Frankie
a resident of Alisal Elementary School
on Aug 26, 2019 at 11:41 pm

Frankie is a registered user.

I don’t think the salaries are out of line. However, it is the benefits that are difficult to swallow. Historically, government employees made less money than the private section but were provided job security, generous medical/dental coverage, vacation and sick time, and early paid retirement with the pension based on the years of employment and a lucrative calculation formula established by self-serving Cal PERS agency. Now, the salaries are at par with the private sector AND the benefits have continued to increase due to labor unions. So the total compensation packages are astounding and often superior to the private sector. It is hurting all cities and new State regulations have been trying to reform the excesses.

6 people like this
Posted by Pro-Law
a resident of another community
on Aug 27, 2019 at 12:52 am

I don't have an opinion on these particular raises, however - I always chuckle and wonder when I see the complaints: If the pay and benefits are so good that one thinks they are overpaid, then why don't the people complaining about it put in for these government jobs?

3 people like this
Posted by Finance Guy
a resident of another community
on Sep 7, 2019 at 9:36 pm

In response to pro-law and others, I agree with you mostly. I also don’t really have an opinion on this particular set of pay raises. I did want to point out that government compensation packages are moving in the direction of the private sector since the recession. The Public Employee Pension Reform Act of 2012 had a lot to do with that. It raised the minimum retirement age of gov employees, increased the employee burden of funding the pensions, and reduced and capped the amount of pension they can receive. It’ll take a while before we see serious financial benefits but it brought us back on track. Also, a growing portion of those benefits are coming out of the pockets of the employees. Medical insurance is no longer free and is no longer for life. Most city employees now pay about 12% of their salaries toward their pensions and then pay for medical and other benefits on top of that. It’s still a great benefits package, don’t get me wrong, but it’s not nearly as good as it once was. Lastly I’d say there are some government jobs you don’t want just anyone doing and city manager is definitely one of those. Competition for talent exists to a surprising extent in the public sector as it does in the private sector but there are serious restrictions on what can be offered in govt jobs. If a private CEO was running a company with as many employees and as big of a budget as the city of Pleasanton, you can bet their salaries are likely several times what the city manager’s is and comes with many more perks and benefits. And those are the jobs high level govt managers can leave the city to take if we don’t take care of them.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Premarital, Women Over 50 Do Get Married
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,917 views

10x Genomics goes public today
By Tim Hunt | 0 comments | 927 views

How Your Email Impacts College Admission Results!
By Elizabeth LaScala | 0 comments | 639 views