Town Square

Post a New Topic

Developer's plan for homes on Lund Ranch continued again

Original post made on Dec 16, 2015

Bowing to threats of law suits or an expensive and time-consuming voter referendum, the City Council Tuesday night voted to adjourn a final public hearing on a proposed development on Lund Ranch to Jan. 5 when it will likely approve a scaled-back plan.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, December 16, 2015, 9:41 AM

Comments (22)

Posted by Mike
a resident of Downtown
on Dec 16, 2015 at 1:43 pm

The fact that we all voted to approve Measure PP means it is good for Pleasanton. Now get on with it and listen to your citizens.

Hopefully we won't have to gather signatures to find a new Mayor next time.

Posted by BobB
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Dec 16, 2015 at 1:47 pm

Go developers!

Our schools will get better and better, just like they did in Dublin as more and more highly motivated and ambitious parents and students move in.

Posted by Jeannie
a resident of Bonde Ranch
on Dec 17, 2015 at 10:16 am

just like the Oak Grove plan, another hugh hillside area that has just 50 homes or less but guarantees acres of public open space Is thwarted by the neighbors who themselves live on top of the ridges above the rest of us and who don't want to see or share their world with any one else. Talk about hipocracy and elitists disguised as do gooders. Do the neighbors pay the property taxes and costs to insure and maintain the pretty scenery they enjoy for free? Maybe they should chip in and give the property owners money for view protection. . If it were my land, after years of working in good faith with the community to design a plan to no avail, I would build a big wind turbine there and say how do you like lthat view?

Posted by Suzie Q
a resident of Heritage Valley
on Dec 17, 2015 at 12:33 pm

Sounds like Jeanie works for the developers or Realtors. You do not represent the majority. Are you sure you don't live in Dublin?

Posted by Julie
a resident of Birdland
on Dec 17, 2015 at 12:36 pm

@Suzie Q - the majority of whom? Most Pleasanton residents couldn't point out the location of Lund Ranch on a map and certainly don't care about 30-40 houses. It's ridiculous, really, the time and expense wasted in arguing about a small number of houses. And don't point to PP; even the drafters of PP disagree as to its implications.

If you want the land to stay vacant, buy it.

Posted by Resident
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Dec 17, 2015 at 1:40 pm

To Julie, a resident of Birdland:

So easy to dismiss this issue when it doesn't affect YOUR neighborhood.

Posted by James
a resident of Highland Oaks
on Dec 17, 2015 at 1:50 pm

I think you nailed it. Developer or realtor- which one is it?

Posted by member
a resident of another community
on Dec 17, 2015 at 6:03 pm

It's all about money,it always is. What everybody needs to do is leave Ptown the hell alone! We are CHOKING on all the "new and improved". The town is becoming just like every other surrounding crowded city,but if you have lots of cash,or clout,you can do, and get whatever you want here. It's the truth and YOU ALL KNOW IT, and just don't give a damn. We don't need more ANYTHING in this town. You are making it into something it was never meant to be. There will be no more hills, fields, trees. We are well on our way to the end of our sweet, peaceful town. You can't say the truth though. Pride goeth before the fall! I'm sure you won't post this either !!

Posted by member
a resident of another community
on Dec 17, 2015 at 6:08 pm

To Bob B -- You must have a slice of the pie coming your way!!! Let me guess,.... you're one of em.

Posted by Map
a resident of Del Prado
on Dec 17, 2015 at 6:32 pm

Have seen a lot of changes to this town in my 40+ years here and not liking where we are heading!! We have a planning commission and a city council that won't be happy till every square inch of available land is developed to the wishes of the highest bidder, too many banks, real estate offices, nail salons, and hair salons downtown, too many massage parlors on 1st street and in every other little strip mall in town and way too many cut-through-full-speed -ahead commuters who love our long green signal lights favoring those same cut-through-commuters!! Let's bring back that plan from years ago to make main st. a one way st. running north to south, it would sure put a damper on those evening commuters and get rid of those illegal u-turns on main!!

Posted by walk the talk?
a resident of Alisal Elementary School
on Dec 17, 2015 at 7:13 pm

How many of you who have expressed concerns wrote a letter to or attended either the planning commission or City Council meetings?

If so, thank you and you have every right to complain here. If you did not, shame on you. We are a democracy and we owe it to our leaders to share our concerns publicly.

Would love to see posters note if they wrote letter or spoke at meeting as it gives them much mroe credibility with their posting. If you do not note this i will assume you are just complaining anonymously.

Posted by Bill B
a resident of Avignon
on Dec 17, 2015 at 7:20 pm

Why doesn't the city just buy the property and keep it open space in perpetuity?

Posted by Dave C
a resident of Old Towne
on Dec 17, 2015 at 9:26 pm

Proposition PP spells out the peoples agreement to a T.There shouldn't be discussion on and on about something the community as a whole agreed to. The city has a moral and legal responsibility to uphold the referendum of which we agreed to. As Americans we cherish the right to vote and have an affect on the outcome of policy. Let us not lose this right!

Posted by Artificial or Natural Slope- Slippery Slope
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Dec 18, 2015 at 10:07 am

IF the slope is now over 25%, does PP apply?

What if the nice Developer goes in with bulldozers and knocks the hills down,
and then claims slope is less than 25%?

Rip Van Winkle was about a developer trying to steel his land.

Same attitude now?

Posted by Cheryl
a resident of Country Fair
on Dec 18, 2015 at 12:23 pm

We have been to meeting after meeting fighting the fight against the 2,000 plus units being built here in P-town. We joined the slow growth group last year to try & scale the building down...but our efforts were lost in the maddess of the passing for overwhelming growth for our small P-town. I wonder, in the next year what we will be looking at...well, lets see: 2,000 plus units + 2 adults,+ 2-4 children, + two cars minimum per unit, you do the math. Traveling on Hopyard & Valley Avenue & Stanley will be a nightmare, it will take 45 minutes to 1 hour just to get to the freeway. I have one thing to say to the builders: Greenbrier & such...STAY OUT OF PLEASANTON, we have seen enough of you to last a lifetime

Posted by Jeanne
a resident of Bonde Ranch
on Dec 19, 2015 at 9:53 am

My family of native Californians for generations know first hand the costs of taxes and maintenance of ranch lands and dealing with new next door residents who protest everything we do to operate and yes sell a portion of land to help pay for expenses.
To think Pleasanton or anywhere in the Bay Area is not going to have development is unrealistic. Even if we didn't, traffic will still increase and having good schools will attract more families with more children especially from Asian countries. Development will provide the money for streets and school improvements. Sorry that is today's reality. We are native Californians and have seen more changes than most people here.

Posted by Map
a resident of Del Prado
on Dec 19, 2015 at 11:44 am

As a "native Californian" I liked this town a lot better before it became a giant parking lot at commute time, we don't need to build on every square inch of land to improve our schools and streets everything is already over crowded and will only get worse, the only gain is for the property owners and developers and churches reselling to developers!!!

Posted by BobB
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Dec 20, 2015 at 1:04 pm


I'm thinking the families moving into the new houses and owners and customers of new businesses would benefit also.

Posted by Josephine
a resident of Mission Park
on Dec 26, 2015 at 1:02 pm

Just who are these new people going to benefit? Not me but maybe the businesses and developers.

Posted by BobB
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Dec 26, 2015 at 7:01 pm


It will benefit the people moving in. Is everything about you?

Posted by Hmmm
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Dec 27, 2015 at 7:23 pm

BillB and BobB must work for the same developer.

Posted by BobB
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Dec 27, 2015 at 11:12 pm


I'm not a developer. Who benefitted when your house was built?

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

Sharing That Just Works
By Sherry Listgarten | 5 comments | 2,232 views

I Do, I Don’t: One Reason Feelings Matter
By Chandrama Anderson | 3 comments | 1,042 views

Looking forward to reading more about Pleasanton in the 1950s
By Tim Hunt | 0 comments | 938 views

Do I Really Have to Study a Foreign Language? Yes! And Here’s Why
By Elizabeth LaScala | 2 comments | 615 views

College textbooks 101
By Monith Ilavarasan | 2 comments | 552 views


2023 guide to summer camps

Looking for something for the kids to do this summer, learn something new and have fun? The Summer Camp Guide features local camps for all ages and interests.

Find Camps Here