Town Square

Post a New Topic

No more waterslides for Shadow Cliffs

Original post made on Mar 1, 2013

What a ride it has been but the popular waterslides opened in 1981 at Shadow Cliffs Regional Recreation Area will not be refurbished or rebuilt.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, March 1, 2013, 12:00 AM

Comments (10)

Like this comment
Posted by norm
a resident of Jensen Tract
on Mar 1, 2013 at 12:29 pm

Looks like the NO not here folks in Pleasanton got what they wanted the slides closed. No more laughing fun filled kids making noise at shadow cliffs. Oh yeah that is because a lot of the kids having fun were either Latino or Black. Can't have them here in lily white Pleasanton.
It is really too bad that the board bought into the reports that would not allow Glen Kierstad a long term lease. Then he might have been able to keep the improvements and repairs up to date.

Every board meeting, every council meeting any time the subject brought up the same group of NO NOT HERE, folks were there saying how bad traffic would be, how much noise would be generated. Well they won and now no more summer jobs for teens, no fun filled parties at the slides. I hope they are happy.

Like this comment
Posted by Sonya Olson
a resident of San Ramon
on Mar 4, 2013 at 9:25 pm

I must say that I am in shock to hear that the water slides will torn down and never to return. I have grown up in this valley and raised 1 1/2 daughters here too, and Shadow Cliff Water Slides has been a great little escape for us during the hot summer months. The water slides were practically my only summer time surprise for my girls mostly because they were so affordable, and me being a single parent that meant everything to us.

I don't think I would have liked it if they expanded the water park to a bigger facility. It was fine just the way it was. not too big I could keep track of my girls when after 10 or so trips up the cement winding road I soon became too tired to hike I keep find a spot off to side and let them do their thing.
It brakes my heart just knowing I have to tell my girls the water slides are gone.

8 people like this
Posted by Eric
a resident of Pleasanton Valley
on Aug 15, 2016 at 5:31 pm

It's been 3 years now that the slides were torn out. It's still a big, dry, dead weed covered hill. No good, clean exercise for kids. No summer jobs for resident kids. No parking fees. Stupid move on the part of EBRPD Board Members to not let the operator rebuild.

6 people like this
Posted by Get the Facts
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Aug 15, 2016 at 5:55 pm

Get the Facts is a registered user.

No more waterslides, and we're gonna pay 11 million for a Costco. Way to go Pleasanton, awesome decisions.

Like this comment
Posted by Tiny Tim
a resident of Birdland
on Aug 15, 2016 at 6:32 pm

Tiny Tim is a registered user.

Get the Facts needs to get the facts. The water slides are on County property. The City of Pleasanton had nothing to do with them leaving. The owner went out of business.

1 person likes this
Posted by Tiny Tim
a resident of Birdland
on Aug 15, 2016 at 6:36 pm

Tiny Tim is a registered user.

Sorry, The slides were actually on East Bay Regional Park District Property, but the city still had nothing to do with it.

Like this comment
Posted by Get the Facts
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Aug 15, 2016 at 8:49 pm

Get the Facts is a registered user.

I didn't say it was the "City of Pleasanton", I simply said "Pleasanton." I just find it representative of all that is happening in Pleasanton. Lots of blame - for lack of a better word - to go around.

6 people like this
Posted by local
a resident of Vintage Hills
on Aug 15, 2016 at 9:42 pm

Sorry Tiny Tim, not quite right there.

Shadow Cliff Park is owned by the East Bay Regional Park District and requires the City of Pleasanton approval and permits for changes to the park. The operator applied to EB Parks to enhance the water slides to something that families today expect. That had to go for approval to the City of Pleasanton for a conditional use permit. The same people out against Costco (at least some of them) came out and protested the change to the water slides and it was very contentious. They claimed traffic from "outsiders" and people driving in from San Jose to come to our water park. The city ended up approving part of the water features after many hearings. It turned out that the operator had a hard time getting the needed investment once the park was scaled down. The investors were also spooked because of those opposing the park and felt that the residents of Pleasanton were going to make it hard for that park to make any upgrades/changes in the future.

Later on the park district met with the Pleasanton community and the community members that showed up (mostly from the neighboring houses) wanted no water slides but rather an interpretive center; which has no financing.

The water park would have been great for Pleasanton families and kids. It would have been paid for out of private money and no tax dollars and would have actually brought money in to the park to improve it.

Like this comment
Posted by Not quite right either
a resident of Vineyard Avenue
on Aug 18, 2016 at 12:26 pm

Actually the real story is that several decades ago a Six Flags theme park was referenced near 680 and Foothill so this time, the city colluded with the developer to do a rezoning of the property for California Splash months before the actual proposal for the theme park was brought before the city council and process it instead with a conditional use permit which is not referendable. The owner of the water slides then posted to the Internet a proposal to sell the California Splash to a corporation while he told the public he was into the proposal for the long haul and would not sell it.

The developer claimed it would garner $ 400,000 in lease revenue for the EBRPD that differed from the amount EPRPD had negotiated. Around the same time the Manteca Water Slides announced their intention to close near the intersection of I 5 and I 205 due to the State's refusal to grant a permit to allow them to continue operations.

Pico, Ayala and Brozosky voted yes for the Theme Park that was not a scaled down version of the water park, but the exact same Theme Park that the Planning and Zoning Commission/Board had earlier denied. The developer then delayed building the park due to health reasons.

By the time the developer recovered, the insurance requirements for Water Parks had increased substantially due to deaths and accidents. The developer then asked EBRPD for funds to renovate the existing water slides. EBRPD refused and the unsafe facility was closed.

The developer asked to be subsidized by tax payer money after claiming he would be privately funded. EBRPD did try to solicit bids for another operator to come run the water slides, but there were no takers.

The existing slides were dismantled, and the Manteca Water Slides are now under water and closed. They are literally under a giant lake. Children and adults continue to be killed by water slides including an incident publicized nationwide a couple of weeks ago.

Like this comment
Posted by local
a resident of Vintage Hills
on Aug 18, 2016 at 3:30 pm

"Not quite right either", I was at the hearing and the council did not approve the full park. There was a lot of discussion and then Pico made a motion to approve a scaled down version of the plans. He actually said that he could support the full plan but was willing to cut some things back to gain more acceptance by the community.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

New state housing requirements could affect Pleasanton
By Jeb Bing | 6 comments | 635 views

Salami, Salami … Baloney
By Tom Cushing | 23 comments | 461 views

Time for new collaboration between city and school district
By Tim Hunt | 2 comments | 429 views