Town Square

Post a New Topic

City Council sets Oak Grove hearings for March 4

Original post made on Feb 20, 2008

The City Council last night agreed to schedule a series of public discussions March 4 on the controversial Oak Grove project, a multi-million-dollar luxury home and open space plan it approved last fall for the hills above Kottinger Ranch and Vintage Hills.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, February 20, 2008, 4:37 PM

Comments (9)

Posted by Stacey
a resident of Amberwood/Wood Meadows
on Feb 20, 2008 at 5:56 pm

PW, you forgot to mention the third scenario, which would be the possibility of one of the parties appealing to a higher court. It is possible that could delay a vote further until a November election.

Posted by slinky
a resident of Amador Estates
on Feb 20, 2008 at 7:39 pm

The headline seems wrong. The court hearing is on Friday, not today. Right?

Posted by frank
a resident of Pleasanton Heights
on Feb 20, 2008 at 8:19 pm

Yes, there is no "today's decision". Later in the text is written
"If Roesch decides Friday that..."

Seems like this article was written for Friday's publication.

Also, I agree that this complaint is a likely candidate for appeal if the Lin's lose, because the Appellate courts have been the primary venue to settle land use disputes vis a vis Election Law. All of this is a consequence of the fact that California has in its constitution an initiative and referendum process that is very liberal. Recall that few states in the union have the same and most have such process at all.

Posted by Karen
a resident of Vintage Hills Elementary School
on Feb 21, 2008 at 9:25 am

Even if the Restraining order is lifted on Friday, it looks like the best bet is to assume the council will push this through to the June 3 election. BTW, do judges normally form and offer their decisions the same day, or do they take it under advisement then get back to us in a few days?

The election will be very intersting come Novemeber. If OG goes down BIG in June by a vote of the citizens of Pleasanton, and councilmember Sullivan and Mayor Hosterman are on record as supporting, their offices could be at risk. Canidate Dan Faustino has said he also supports OG.

If Ayala's statements are true, and I have no reason to doubt them, signature collection - even in the Thanksgiving Holiday timeframe was easy - the majority could stand against OG and against the two of them.

Anyone intested in running on the Anti OG ticket?

Posted by Karen
a resident of Vintage Hills Elementary School
on Feb 21, 2008 at 9:28 am

Then there is the other option, as frank stated. If this goes to the Appellate courts and ultimately ends up on the November ballot... Again, the November election could be interesting with OG a pivotal issue that divides the voters of this town and helps characterize the candidates.

Posted by sad to say
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Feb 21, 2008 at 1:14 pm

Oak Grove won't divide Pleasanton. Hypocrisy leadership will!

Posted by Angela
a resident of Heritage Valley
on Feb 27, 2008 at 11:18 pm

"Push this through to the June 3 ballot"? Karen, I thought that is what you all wanted, a vote on Oak Grove.

Actually, an appeal could push this longer than that. To get on the November ballot, that decision must be made by mid-August. The appeals court is slow...

Posted by Karen
a resident of Vintage Hills
on Feb 28, 2008 at 10:19 am

Actually Angela, what I really want is for our Council to wake up and listen to their constituents. I strongly believe the majority of people in this town do NOT want OG, and they want their ridge lines & hilltops protected for perpetuity.

Since that is a smoke dream, I personally would like to see this on the ballot in June '08. If that doesn't happen, putting OG to a vote to the people in November would be more fun. Elected officials that voted in favor of OG, will find out just how commonly held their opinions are. It will also give the candidates a chance to fully present their points of view, which they claim they have NOT been able to do to the 5200 signers. Rather than promises, actual Council votes will reflect the Member's opinions and points of views.

The last Mayorial election was decided by less than 200 votes, and this could be a deciding factor. One thing is for sure, it will be a much bigger issue than improper use of email...

Posted by Stacey
a resident of Amberwood/Wood Meadows
on Feb 28, 2008 at 12:12 pm

As per the article in The Independent today regarding Pleasanton City Council's work plan for this year, I hope you are writing to City Council to encourage them to work on the development of a hillside ordinance if you truly care about this issue.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

How quickly will we electrify our homes?
By Sherry Listgarten | 13 comments | 2,223 views

How muddled are the Pleasanton council's priorities
By Tim Hunt | 7 comments | 1,495 views

Expanding access to Yosemite's wonders
By Monith Ilavarasan | 6 comments | 1,095 views

Eligibility in the Local Context (ELC)
By Elizabeth LaScala | 0 comments | 379 views


2023 guide to summer camps

Looking for something for the kids to do this summer, learn something new and have fun? The Summer Camp Guide features local camps for all ages and interests.

Find Camps Here