News

Pleasanton: City details contract offer rejected by police union before declaring impasse

Proposal included 15%-18% raises, increased contribution to retiree benefits, pay uptick for special assignments

Pleasanton city negotiators offered unionized police personnel raises between 15% to 18% over three years as part of its latest contract proposal days before the Pleasanton Police Officers Association declared an impasse in labor talks, city officials confirmed Thursday.

PPOA logo.

Responding a day after the union announced the impasse with a scathing public statement, city administration detailed terms of an offer they said would address officers' concerns about salary and benefits levels while also being respectful of Pleasanton's budget uncertainty anticipated in the immediate years ahead.

"Considering the current economic climate in which the city's expenditures are expected to continue outpacing revenues for the next several years, the city has offered a generous compensation package that represents one of the largest pay increases for police officers and sergeants in the city's history," city officials said in a statement Thursday evening.

"Despite the recent statement from the PPOA, the city remains committed to reaching an agreement that works financially within budget restraints, while demonstrating the city's commitment to the well-being of its police officers and sergeants," city officials added.

PPOA pressed the impasse button on Wednesday after several months of apparently tense negotiations behind the scenes without a deal. The association's current memorandum of understanding with the city is due to expire at the end of May.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

A union press release argued that the city "has rejected every proposal to provide competitive compensation" for officers and sergeants, and that ongoing problems with retention and recruitment plaguing the Pleasanton Police Department has led to significant staffing shortages compounded by an "exodus of personnel to other law enforcement agencies".

"Despite the department's glaring needs, the city's proposals would ensure that its police officer compensation would remain below both the market average and median. This significant discrepancy puts Pleasanton at a disadvantage in recruiting and retaining the best law enforcement professionals, and all but ensuring further staffing shortages," PPOA said in its statement Wednesday.

City Manager Gerry Beaudin's office responded to the comments from PPOA leadership on Thursday evening by making public details about the offer they said their negotiations put forward on May 19 that the union ultimately rejected.

The city's proposed three-year MOU would include a 6% raise for officers and a 9% raise for sergeants beginning on June 1, followed by a 9% increase total for each position over the course of the remaining two years of the contract.

City officials said they also agreed to PPOA's requests to triple the city's contribution to employee's retiree health savings accounts and to provide an additional 5% premium pay for specific departmental assignments.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

According to the city, its offer would increase city operational costs by over $6.6 million over the contract term.

That's at a time when the city estimates having budget surpluses of just $4,112 and $4,740 for the next two fiscal years before dropping into a deficit of $1.3 million by fiscal year 2025-26 under normal economic conditions -- or a deficit of as much as $6.7 million in the third year if a recession hits in 2024.

The two sides were set to return to the bargaining table on Wednesday (May 24), but the union canceled the meeting and instead declared an impasse, according to the city. The move starts the clock on an impasse process whose details and schedule were not immediately clarified publicly.

This marks the second consecutive year the city reached formal impasse with a public safety employee union in labor negotiations.

Fire Fighters Local 1974 declared an impasse with Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department administration in March 2022 before the two sides came to an agreement three months later that included 13% in general wage increases over 3-1/2 years, a paramedic premium pay increase and a comprehensive drug- and alcohol-testing policy.

Jeremy Walsh
 
Jeremy Walsh, a Benicia native and American University alum, joined Embarcadero Media in November 2013. After serving as associate editor for the Pleasanton Weekly and DanvilleSanRamon.com, he was promoted to editor of the East Bay Division in February 2017. Read more >>

Follow PleasantonWeekly.com and the Pleasanton Weekly on Twitter @pleasantonnews, Facebook and on Instagram @pleasantonweekly for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Get uninterrupted access to important local crime news. Become a member today.

Pleasanton: City details contract offer rejected by police union before declaring impasse

Proposal included 15%-18% raises, increased contribution to retiree benefits, pay uptick for special assignments

by / Pleasanton Weekly

Uploaded: Thu, May 25, 2023, 11:16 pm

Pleasanton city negotiators offered unionized police personnel raises between 15% to 18% over three years as part of its latest contract proposal days before the Pleasanton Police Officers Association declared an impasse in labor talks, city officials confirmed Thursday.

Responding a day after the union announced the impasse with a scathing public statement, city administration detailed terms of an offer they said would address officers' concerns about salary and benefits levels while also being respectful of Pleasanton's budget uncertainty anticipated in the immediate years ahead.

"Considering the current economic climate in which the city's expenditures are expected to continue outpacing revenues for the next several years, the city has offered a generous compensation package that represents one of the largest pay increases for police officers and sergeants in the city's history," city officials said in a statement Thursday evening.

"Despite the recent statement from the PPOA, the city remains committed to reaching an agreement that works financially within budget restraints, while demonstrating the city's commitment to the well-being of its police officers and sergeants," city officials added.

PPOA pressed the impasse button on Wednesday after several months of apparently tense negotiations behind the scenes without a deal. The association's current memorandum of understanding with the city is due to expire at the end of May.

A union press release argued that the city "has rejected every proposal to provide competitive compensation" for officers and sergeants, and that ongoing problems with retention and recruitment plaguing the Pleasanton Police Department has led to significant staffing shortages compounded by an "exodus of personnel to other law enforcement agencies".

"Despite the department's glaring needs, the city's proposals would ensure that its police officer compensation would remain below both the market average and median. This significant discrepancy puts Pleasanton at a disadvantage in recruiting and retaining the best law enforcement professionals, and all but ensuring further staffing shortages," PPOA said in its statement Wednesday.

City Manager Gerry Beaudin's office responded to the comments from PPOA leadership on Thursday evening by making public details about the offer they said their negotiations put forward on May 19 that the union ultimately rejected.

The city's proposed three-year MOU would include a 6% raise for officers and a 9% raise for sergeants beginning on June 1, followed by a 9% increase total for each position over the course of the remaining two years of the contract.

City officials said they also agreed to PPOA's requests to triple the city's contribution to employee's retiree health savings accounts and to provide an additional 5% premium pay for specific departmental assignments.

According to the city, its offer would increase city operational costs by over $6.6 million over the contract term.

That's at a time when the city estimates having budget surpluses of just $4,112 and $4,740 for the next two fiscal years before dropping into a deficit of $1.3 million by fiscal year 2025-26 under normal economic conditions -- or a deficit of as much as $6.7 million in the third year if a recession hits in 2024.

The two sides were set to return to the bargaining table on Wednesday (May 24), but the union canceled the meeting and instead declared an impasse, according to the city. The move starts the clock on an impasse process whose details and schedule were not immediately clarified publicly.

This marks the second consecutive year the city reached formal impasse with a public safety employee union in labor negotiations.

Fire Fighters Local 1974 declared an impasse with Livermore-Pleasanton Fire Department administration in March 2022 before the two sides came to an agreement three months later that included 13% in general wage increases over 3-1/2 years, a paramedic premium pay increase and a comprehensive drug- and alcohol-testing policy.

Comments

keeknlinda
Registered user
Vintage Hills
on May 26, 2023 at 7:55 pm
keeknlinda, Vintage Hills
Registered user
on May 26, 2023 at 7:55 pm

Percentages don't mean much without knowing what the starting dollar amount is and how they compare with similar departments.


Kathleen Ruegsegger
Registered user
Vintage Hills
on May 27, 2023 at 8:10 am
Kathleen Ruegsegger, Vintage Hills
Registered user
on May 27, 2023 at 8:10 am
Been here a while
Registered user
West of Foothill
on May 27, 2023 at 1:25 pm
Been here a while, West of Foothill
Registered user
on May 27, 2023 at 1:25 pm

None of these percentage numbers cited by the City mean anything without the context of showing whether Pleasanton indeed does pay less than other comparable cities with which we must compete for quality officers. As an example, the City could be offering 50% increases, which certainly would sound like a lot; however, if that hypothetical 50% increase still left Pleasanton's police salaries below the top tier, we still would lose quality individuals and still would not be able to attract other quality individuals. In other words, what really matters is not how the cited percentage increases may sound in a vacuum, what matters is how we stack up against those other cities that are enticing our officers to leave Pleasanton. We definitely should not be below the median and, in fact, I believe Pleasanton should be near the top if we truly want the best police department, one that attracts and retains the best people and one that does not have the currently unacceptable level of vacancies. What is more important than that?


MsVic
Registered user
Mission Park
on May 29, 2023 at 11:49 am
MsVic, Mission Park
Registered user
on May 29, 2023 at 11:49 am

Agree with others - percentages are meaningless without context. Apparently spending over 10 million on a skate park and century house refurbishment is more important than paying our police officers a competitive wage. Our City Council really needs to readdress the priorities. Mayor Brown are you listening?


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.