News

Alameda County's Measure D passes easily

Agricultural land-use policy amendments approved by nearly 70% of voters

Voters across Alameda County have overwhelmingly supported the changes to agricultural and open space land-use policy for unincorporated areas, including the Livermore Valley, proposed under Measure D.

An amendment to the original Measure D, a proposition initially passed in 2000 countywide, the 2022 Measure D aimed to implement updates to the law that included expanding size, location and flexibility of potential buildings in agricultural areas, such as wine country operations.

Needing a simple majority of the vote in order to pass in the Nov. 8 election, Measure D has garnered 69.71% Yes in support to 30.29% No in opposition, as of Monday's results update -- which accounts for the vast majority of ballots cast countywide.

Measure D began as a way to conserve open agricultural space and large undeveloped rural land areas. The 2000 version of the measure required that to instate any amendments, voters would have to show support and approve them.

Its new amendments will allow for the inclusion and renovation of equestrian facilities, and additional operations for wineries and olive presses. The Livermore City Council was among the groups to enthusiastically endorse the 2022 Measure D.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

The policy changes came in the wake of a report earlier this year by the Alameda County Local Agency Formation Commission that recommended the text amendments.

Since the LAFCO report, the Alameda County Community Development Agency and Planning Department clarified what the impacts would look like and determined that besides what is already allowed by the 2000 version, no additional land-uses would be introduced under the new Measure D.

"Over the past approximately 10 years, there has been a great deal of discussion about potential amendments to Measure D 2000 to increase the floor-area ratio allowed for agricultural buildings and equestrian facilities," department officials said in a statement at the time.

They also gave an explanation as to why land owners and county residents would opt to vote Yes, saying, "Members of the agricultural community and owners of equestrian facilities in the county have maintained that the square footage limitations put in place by (2000) Measure D inhibits their ability to have thriving agricultural operations."

Many supporters argued the amendments would positively benefit not only the wine and agricultural communities, but residents as well. Arguments against the measure, most notably made by the Alameda County Taxpayers Association, raised concerns about the growth of larger wineries into "wine factories", among other contentions.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

Looking for more Livermore stories? The Livermore Vine will be your new source of vital news and information. Sign up to be among the first to get our daily local news headlines sent to your inbox for free.

Nicole Gonzales
 
Nicole Gonzales is a staff reporter for Embarcadero Media’s East Bay Division, the Pleasanton Weekly. Nicole began writing for the publication in July 2022. Read more >>

Follow PleasantonWeekly.com and the Pleasanton Weekly on Twitter @pleasantonnews, Facebook and on Instagram @pleasantonweekly for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Get uninterrupted access to important local political news. Become a member today.

Alameda County's Measure D passes easily

Agricultural land-use policy amendments approved by nearly 70% of voters

by / Pleasanton Weekly

Uploaded: Wed, Nov 23, 2022, 8:23 pm

Voters across Alameda County have overwhelmingly supported the changes to agricultural and open space land-use policy for unincorporated areas, including the Livermore Valley, proposed under Measure D.

An amendment to the original Measure D, a proposition initially passed in 2000 countywide, the 2022 Measure D aimed to implement updates to the law that included expanding size, location and flexibility of potential buildings in agricultural areas, such as wine country operations.

Needing a simple majority of the vote in order to pass in the Nov. 8 election, Measure D has garnered 69.71% Yes in support to 30.29% No in opposition, as of Monday's results update -- which accounts for the vast majority of ballots cast countywide.

Measure D began as a way to conserve open agricultural space and large undeveloped rural land areas. The 2000 version of the measure required that to instate any amendments, voters would have to show support and approve them.

Its new amendments will allow for the inclusion and renovation of equestrian facilities, and additional operations for wineries and olive presses. The Livermore City Council was among the groups to enthusiastically endorse the 2022 Measure D.

The policy changes came in the wake of a report earlier this year by the Alameda County Local Agency Formation Commission that recommended the text amendments.

Since the LAFCO report, the Alameda County Community Development Agency and Planning Department clarified what the impacts would look like and determined that besides what is already allowed by the 2000 version, no additional land-uses would be introduced under the new Measure D.

"Over the past approximately 10 years, there has been a great deal of discussion about potential amendments to Measure D 2000 to increase the floor-area ratio allowed for agricultural buildings and equestrian facilities," department officials said in a statement at the time.

They also gave an explanation as to why land owners and county residents would opt to vote Yes, saying, "Members of the agricultural community and owners of equestrian facilities in the county have maintained that the square footage limitations put in place by (2000) Measure D inhibits their ability to have thriving agricultural operations."

Many supporters argued the amendments would positively benefit not only the wine and agricultural communities, but residents as well. Arguments against the measure, most notably made by the Alameda County Taxpayers Association, raised concerns about the growth of larger wineries into "wine factories", among other contentions.

Comments

There are no comments yet. Please share yours below.

Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.