News

PUSD's Measure I clinches victory with better than 57% of the vote

$395M bond climbs back from trailing position to surpass 55% threshold

After nearly two weeks of counting eligible vote-by-mail ballots, Pleasanton Unified School District's Measure I came from behind and was able to receive more than the 55% of votes needed to pass.

As it stands the $395 million general obligation bond that will go toward funding for school facility upgrades has 57.18% Yes (15,653 votes) and 42.82% No (11,750 votes), according to Monday's election results report from the Alameda County Registrar of Voters' Office -- the final major tally update expected from the county.

"When we received the numbers posted on Friday evening, Todd (Utikal) and I were downright ecstatic," Bill Butler, a pro advocate for the bond and co-chair of the Yes on I campaign group alongside Utikal, told the Weekly.

"We are both extremely grateful and humbled by these results. We want to express our heartfelt thanks to the voters, our volunteers and the team we were able to assemble to advocate on behalf of the 'Yes on I' campaign. It was an honor of a lifetime to be aligned in supporting our teachers and students here in Pleasanton."

The bond started Election Night with 52.79% of residents voting Yes and 47.21% No but has steadily increased in Yes votes over the ensuing updates from the county as more eligible ballots were tabulated.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

Yes on Measure I officially broke the 55% threshold by getting a 1.12% lead last Wednesday before going past the 57% mark on Friday -- an advantage that appears insurmountable based on the low number of ballots left countywide.

"Unless there are a number of no ballots still waiting to be counted, I think the measure has passed," Kathleen Ruegsegger, a former trustee and strong advocate against the bond, told the Weekly. "Congratulations to those voting Yes. We will now be watching carefully how this tremendous amount of money is spent."

Measure I would be the second bond Pleasanton voters have approved since 2016, when the $270 million Measure I1 passed that November.

PUSD had previously attempted to pass another bond in 2020, but the $323 million Measure M bond fell short with a final tally of 52.40% Yes votes and 47.60% No. Unlike Measure I, Measure M actually trailed at the beginning of the election with 51.41% No and 48.59% Yes on Election Night in March 2020.

Measure I will help fund the first tier phase of the district's Facilities Master Plan, which was approved by the school board in June. It would utilize a tax rate of $49 per $100,000 of assessed value for Pleasanton property owners to fund that first tier round of projects which includes gym and theater constructions at both Amador Valley and Foothill high schools as well as new classrooms at Vintage Hills Elementary.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

The second tier of the master plan will focus on deferred maintenance, restructuring of the visual performing arts in high schools, cafeteria and air conditioning and heating equipment.

"We are excited about the slate of projects set to be built or renovated with the proceeds from this bond measure and look forward to seeing how they will positively impact our students, teachers and the rest of our community for many years to come," Butler said.

While the county hasn't certified the election, the vast majority of the ballots have been counted, according to Dwayna Gullatt, an administrative assistant at the registrar's office.

Gullatt told the Weekly that 32,000 out of the nearly 500,000 ballots in the county were cast in person and were counted on Election Night. The rest were mail-in ballots that were meticulously processed over the last couple of weeks.

She said Friday's update from the county included the "bulk of the remaining votes" and that there were about 2,000 votes countywide included in Monday's update. There are also another 2,500 that need signatures cured across Alameda County; it is unclear how many of those come from residents within PUSD's boundaries.

The next results update won't be until closer to Dec. 8, which is when the county must officially certify the election.

According to the county's election data, the total tally of voter turnout countywide as of now is 53.23%, including vote-by-mail ballots received before Election Day and votes cast in-person. The total number of ballots cast is reported to be 495,599.

A front row seat to local high school sports.

Check out our new newsletter, the Playbook.

Christian Trujano
 
Christian Trujano, a Bay Area native and San Jose State alum, joined Embarcadero Media in May 2022 following his graduation. He is an award-winning student journalist who has covered stories in San Jose ranging from crime to higher education. Read more >>

Follow PleasantonWeekly.com and the Pleasanton Weekly on Twitter @pleasantonnews, Facebook and on Instagram @pleasantonweekly for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Get uninterrupted access to important local education news. Become a member today.

PUSD's Measure I clinches victory with better than 57% of the vote

$395M bond climbs back from trailing position to surpass 55% threshold

by / Pleasanton Weekly

Uploaded: Tue, Nov 22, 2022, 12:34 am

After nearly two weeks of counting eligible vote-by-mail ballots, Pleasanton Unified School District's Measure I came from behind and was able to receive more than the 55% of votes needed to pass.

As it stands the $395 million general obligation bond that will go toward funding for school facility upgrades has 57.18% Yes (15,653 votes) and 42.82% No (11,750 votes), according to Monday's election results report from the Alameda County Registrar of Voters' Office -- the final major tally update expected from the county.

"When we received the numbers posted on Friday evening, Todd (Utikal) and I were downright ecstatic," Bill Butler, a pro advocate for the bond and co-chair of the Yes on I campaign group alongside Utikal, told the Weekly.

"We are both extremely grateful and humbled by these results. We want to express our heartfelt thanks to the voters, our volunteers and the team we were able to assemble to advocate on behalf of the 'Yes on I' campaign. It was an honor of a lifetime to be aligned in supporting our teachers and students here in Pleasanton."

The bond started Election Night with 52.79% of residents voting Yes and 47.21% No but has steadily increased in Yes votes over the ensuing updates from the county as more eligible ballots were tabulated.

Yes on Measure I officially broke the 55% threshold by getting a 1.12% lead last Wednesday before going past the 57% mark on Friday -- an advantage that appears insurmountable based on the low number of ballots left countywide.

"Unless there are a number of no ballots still waiting to be counted, I think the measure has passed," Kathleen Ruegsegger, a former trustee and strong advocate against the bond, told the Weekly. "Congratulations to those voting Yes. We will now be watching carefully how this tremendous amount of money is spent."

Measure I would be the second bond Pleasanton voters have approved since 2016, when the $270 million Measure I1 passed that November.

PUSD had previously attempted to pass another bond in 2020, but the $323 million Measure M bond fell short with a final tally of 52.40% Yes votes and 47.60% No. Unlike Measure I, Measure M actually trailed at the beginning of the election with 51.41% No and 48.59% Yes on Election Night in March 2020.

Measure I will help fund the first tier phase of the district's Facilities Master Plan, which was approved by the school board in June. It would utilize a tax rate of $49 per $100,000 of assessed value for Pleasanton property owners to fund that first tier round of projects which includes gym and theater constructions at both Amador Valley and Foothill high schools as well as new classrooms at Vintage Hills Elementary.

The second tier of the master plan will focus on deferred maintenance, restructuring of the visual performing arts in high schools, cafeteria and air conditioning and heating equipment.

"We are excited about the slate of projects set to be built or renovated with the proceeds from this bond measure and look forward to seeing how they will positively impact our students, teachers and the rest of our community for many years to come," Butler said.

While the county hasn't certified the election, the vast majority of the ballots have been counted, according to Dwayna Gullatt, an administrative assistant at the registrar's office.

Gullatt told the Weekly that 32,000 out of the nearly 500,000 ballots in the county were cast in person and were counted on Election Night. The rest were mail-in ballots that were meticulously processed over the last couple of weeks.

She said Friday's update from the county included the "bulk of the remaining votes" and that there were about 2,000 votes countywide included in Monday's update. There are also another 2,500 that need signatures cured across Alameda County; it is unclear how many of those come from residents within PUSD's boundaries.

The next results update won't be until closer to Dec. 8, which is when the county must officially certify the election.

According to the county's election data, the total tally of voter turnout countywide as of now is 53.23%, including vote-by-mail ballots received before Election Day and votes cast in-person. The total number of ballots cast is reported to be 495,599.

Comments

SHale99
Registered user
Village High School
on Nov 23, 2022 at 12:31 pm
SHale99, Village High School
Registered user
on Nov 23, 2022 at 12:31 pm
Pleasanton Parent
Registered user
Pleasanton Meadows
on Nov 28, 2022 at 9:38 am
Pleasanton Parent, Pleasanton Meadows
Registered user
on Nov 28, 2022 at 9:38 am

Regardless of your position on the measure, voter turnout was embarrassing.

I’m shocked


Jake Waters
Registered user
Birdland
on Nov 30, 2022 at 9:47 am
Jake Waters, Birdland
Registered user
on Nov 30, 2022 at 9:47 am

(Portion removed because the referenced post was left unapproved because of staffing shortages and lack of time by the one person who monitors (who is doing three other jobs in addition to monitoring this week), not because of "group think.")

We citizens are told that voting is or was our majority responsibility to participate in ‘Democracy,’ but because of happenstance and demonstrably poor performance of the counting process, we are left to many questions- and to question seems to be an offensive response to those in charge. So I will ask again: with such a small outcome to this measure why is it taking so long to complete this task? Furthermore, why are there still more votes coming it? Why haven’t all the votes in California been counted regarding the overall election? One cannot feel secure in the notion that our civic duty was respected.

Ok Pleasanton Weekly, the ball is in your court. Post? Or not?


SHale99
Registered user
Village High School
on Nov 30, 2022 at 4:02 pm
SHale99, Village High School
Registered user
on Nov 30, 2022 at 4:02 pm

One wonders if anybody has peeked at the election laws in CAlif and knows counties have a full month to certify the election results.

No points for certifying early.

I mean, I wonder.......


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.