News

Pleasanton Unified's Measure I pulls ahead, now 1.12% above threshold needed to pass

Race is still not over as county continues to process ballots

Pleasanton Unified School District's Measure I has broken the threshold of votes needed to pass as it looks to become the city's second school bond in the last 25 years, according to Wednesday's election results update from the county.

"(I'm) beyond excited about that news, but it's not over yet," Todd Utikal, co-chair for the Yes on I campaign committee, told the Weekly. "Hoping that by Thanksgiving, we'll know that Measure I has passed and we can do such great things for our kids (and) students here in Pleasanton."

The $395 million general obligation bond started off on Election Night with being just shy of the 55% of votes needed, but it has since jumped to 56.12% of residents (11,992) voting Yes and 43.88% (9,378) voting No, according to the Alameda County Registrar of Voters' Office.

According to the county's election data, the total tally of voter turnout countywide as of now is 36.51%, including vote-by-mail ballots received before Election Day and votes cast in-person. The total number of ballots that were cast as of Wednesday is 339,942.

There is one more update to the results scheduled this week on Thursday, according to the registrar's office, but as of now it is still unsure how many ballots need to be counted out of Pleasanton.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

Kathleen Ruegsegger, a strong advocate against the bond, told the Weekly that while the bond has exceeded the 55% threshold, Wednesday's numbers are still not the final count.

"While it appears the numbers could stay above 55%, we will wait patiently to hear the final count," Ruegsegger said.

If, however, the trend continues and Measure I holds its position it would be the second bond Pleasanton voters have approved since Measure I1, the $270 million bond measure, passed in November 2016. Measure I would help fund the first tier phase of the district's Facilities Master Plan, which was approved by the school board in June.

It would utilize a tax rate of $49 per $100,000 of assessed value for Pleasanton property owners to fund that first tier round of projects which includes gym and theater constructions at both Amador Valley and Foothill high schools as well as new classrooms at Vintage Hills Elementary.

The second tier of the master plan will focus on deferred maintenance, restructuring of the visual performing arts in high schools, cafeteria and air conditioning and heating equipment.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

Stay informed

Get the latest local news and information sent straight to your inbox.

The district had previously attempted at passing a similar bond in 2020 with the $323 million Measure M bond, which fell short with a final tally of 52.40% Yes votes and 47.60% No.

Unlike Measure I, Measure M actually trailed at the beginning of the election with 51.41% No and 48.59% Yes on Election Night in March 2020.

Measure I started off Election Night with 52.79% of residents voting Yes and 47.21% but has steadily increased in Yes votes over the past couple of updates from the county.

Thursday's update after Election Night showed the bond picking up more votes toward approval and then on Monday it went from 53.22% of residents voting Yes to 54.63% -- the number of residents voting No went down to 45.37%.

Tuesday's update then had the bond at 0.06% away from passing before it took the 1.12% lead on Wednesday.

"This is what we hoped, is that these later votes were people that took the time to learn more about Measure I, the oversight for bond measures in Pleasanton, and to have faith in the school district and what we can do for our kids in the future," Utikal said.

A front row seat to local high school sports.

Check out our new newsletter, the Playbook.

Christian Trujano
 
Christian Trujano, a Bay Area native and San Jose State alum, joined Embarcadero Media in May 2022 following his graduation. He is an award-winning student journalist who has covered stories in San Jose ranging from crime to higher education. Read more >>

Follow PleasantonWeekly.com and the Pleasanton Weekly on Twitter @pleasantonnews, Facebook and on Instagram @pleasantonweekly for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Your support is vital to us continuing to bring you education news. Become a member today.

Pleasanton Unified's Measure I pulls ahead, now 1.12% above threshold needed to pass

Race is still not over as county continues to process ballots

by / Pleasanton Weekly

Uploaded: Wed, Nov 16, 2022, 5:43 pm

Pleasanton Unified School District's Measure I has broken the threshold of votes needed to pass as it looks to become the city's second school bond in the last 25 years, according to Wednesday's election results update from the county.

"(I'm) beyond excited about that news, but it's not over yet," Todd Utikal, co-chair for the Yes on I campaign committee, told the Weekly. "Hoping that by Thanksgiving, we'll know that Measure I has passed and we can do such great things for our kids (and) students here in Pleasanton."

The $395 million general obligation bond started off on Election Night with being just shy of the 55% of votes needed, but it has since jumped to 56.12% of residents (11,992) voting Yes and 43.88% (9,378) voting No, according to the Alameda County Registrar of Voters' Office.

According to the county's election data, the total tally of voter turnout countywide as of now is 36.51%, including vote-by-mail ballots received before Election Day and votes cast in-person. The total number of ballots that were cast as of Wednesday is 339,942.

There is one more update to the results scheduled this week on Thursday, according to the registrar's office, but as of now it is still unsure how many ballots need to be counted out of Pleasanton.

Kathleen Ruegsegger, a strong advocate against the bond, told the Weekly that while the bond has exceeded the 55% threshold, Wednesday's numbers are still not the final count.

"While it appears the numbers could stay above 55%, we will wait patiently to hear the final count," Ruegsegger said.

If, however, the trend continues and Measure I holds its position it would be the second bond Pleasanton voters have approved since Measure I1, the $270 million bond measure, passed in November 2016. Measure I would help fund the first tier phase of the district's Facilities Master Plan, which was approved by the school board in June.

It would utilize a tax rate of $49 per $100,000 of assessed value for Pleasanton property owners to fund that first tier round of projects which includes gym and theater constructions at both Amador Valley and Foothill high schools as well as new classrooms at Vintage Hills Elementary.

The second tier of the master plan will focus on deferred maintenance, restructuring of the visual performing arts in high schools, cafeteria and air conditioning and heating equipment.

The district had previously attempted at passing a similar bond in 2020 with the $323 million Measure M bond, which fell short with a final tally of 52.40% Yes votes and 47.60% No.

Unlike Measure I, Measure M actually trailed at the beginning of the election with 51.41% No and 48.59% Yes on Election Night in March 2020.

Measure I started off Election Night with 52.79% of residents voting Yes and 47.21% but has steadily increased in Yes votes over the past couple of updates from the county.

Thursday's update after Election Night showed the bond picking up more votes toward approval and then on Monday it went from 53.22% of residents voting Yes to 54.63% -- the number of residents voting No went down to 45.37%.

Tuesday's update then had the bond at 0.06% away from passing before it took the 1.12% lead on Wednesday.

"This is what we hoped, is that these later votes were people that took the time to learn more about Measure I, the oversight for bond measures in Pleasanton, and to have faith in the school district and what we can do for our kids in the future," Utikal said.

Comments

Ron
Registered user
another community
on Nov 16, 2022 at 7:13 pm
Ron, another community
Registered user
on Nov 16, 2022 at 7:13 pm

[Post removed as unverified allegation without evidence]


Pton Resident
Registered user
Foothill High School
on Nov 16, 2022 at 7:25 pm
Pton Resident, Foothill High School
Registered user
on Nov 16, 2022 at 7:25 pm

There are about 20,000 votes, yet they're still not all counted? Good lord, our government election processes are awful.


Peter
Registered user
Golden Eagle
on Nov 17, 2022 at 10:34 am
Peter, Golden Eagle
Registered user
on Nov 17, 2022 at 10:34 am

If you want to see what's driving inflation, look no further than this. Headed towards double dip recession, spiking interest rates, severe layoffs and we think we need to build new gyms.

Just goes to show the only thing recession proof is the government spending your money.


Barbara Costello
Registered user
Highland Oaks
on Nov 17, 2022 at 4:27 pm
Barbara Costello, Highland Oaks
Registered user
on Nov 17, 2022 at 4:27 pm

Can someone please explain why it has taken so long to count the Pleasanton Measure I votes? This is not a big town and we generally get fairly low turnout in elections. We need to go back to requiring all votes be postmarked and RECEIVED by election day, instead of allowing the vote to drag out for weeks. If we want to feel confident that our elections are valid and honest, holding an election month is not the right direction.


Karl A
Registered user
Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Nov 17, 2022 at 8:08 pm
Karl A, Another Pleasanton neighborhood
Registered user
on Nov 17, 2022 at 8:08 pm

I believe with mail in ballots the law says they have 30 days to collect, review and count all the ballots. I think Dec 9th is the final day.

While I don’t think there is anything going wrong with the counts, one has to wonder why the supposed greatest democracy on earth takes a month to let us know the results.

I was using drop box voting until this last election. I got to thinking I want my ballot to be secret as it should be. Mail in lets everyone who handles it know my personal choices. My vote is nobody’s business but my own.


Pleasanton Valley Rez
Registered user
Pleasanton Valley
on Nov 18, 2022 at 9:40 am
Pleasanton Valley Rez, Pleasanton Valley
Registered user
on Nov 18, 2022 at 9:40 am

Why do I have a feeling that money from this measure will go to pay for Haglund's newly purchased District Office building???


SHale99
Registered user
Village High School
on Nov 18, 2022 at 4:24 pm
SHale99, Village High School
Registered user
on Nov 18, 2022 at 4:24 pm

the proceeds of selling most of the DO acres will cover the 'new' digs. As well as a tenant, who will be paying the district.

One only needs to view where the money is scheduled to go to see.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.