News

COVID stipends cause outcry from unions at Alameda County Office of Education

Superintendent Monroe 'takes full responsibility' amid criticism of process for giving most money to management employees

The superintendent of Alameda County apologized last week after her office spent about $600,000 in COVID relief funds on stipends for her staff, mostly managers who took on extra duties during the pandemic.

Alameda County Superintendent of Schools L.K. Monroe. (Contributed photo)

Giving the money to staff was allowed under the federal and state grants, but has riled union leaders who say managers -- and not union members -- got the bulk of the funds, and the process wasn't transparent or legal under the education code.

The payouts ranged from $200 to more than $26,000, depending on the amount of extra work the employee did. Tasks included COVID testing, contact tracing, distributing masks and overseeing logistics related to opening and closing school campuses.

The incident comes about three weeks before Superintendent L.K. Monroe faces re-election on June 7 for a third term. She is running against Alysse Castro, who's been endorsed by the California School Employees Association, which represents about half of the 210 employees of the Alameda County Office of Education.

At least eight managers who received stipends donated money to Monroe's re-election campaign, with amounts ranging from $100 to more than $2,500, according to campaign finance filings.

Help sustain the local news you depend on.

Your contribution matters. Become a member today.

Join

"Superintendent Monroe has acknowledged that the manner in which the stipends were disbursed has caused significant strife in the agency and with the agency's labor groups. She takes full responsibility for this," said county office spokeswoman Michelle Smith McDonald, who was among the managers who received a stipend.

The statement from the Alameda County Office of Education said its "leadership is working to be responsive, transparent with requested documentation and will be collaborating with our labor partners to provide compensation to all employees in the agency for their extraordinary commitment to our students and schools," she said. "As leaders, we live our ACOE values and use our mistakes as an opportunity to grow and do better by the amazing agency that we serve."

The county school board reviewed the stipends on May 10 but didn't take action. Under the state education code, county superintendents can't give stipends of more than $10,000 without board discussion.

Superintendent Monroe did not receive a stipend.

The Alameda County Office of Education provides support for Alameda County's 18 school districts, including budget oversight and professional development for teachers, and runs schools for students in juvenile detention or who are pregnant or parenting.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox in our Express newsletter.

The office received about $15 million in COVID relief funds from the federal Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund and the California Department of Public Health during COVID.

Both grants allow for schools and districts to spend the money on staff who work on COVID-related tasks, ranging from student learning loss to COVID testing, and many did. In fact, Gov. Newsom and President Biden have both encouraged districts to spend the money on staff.

Kindra Britt, director of communications and strategy for the California County Superintendents Educational Services Association, said that COVID relief stipends played a crucial role in retaining staff and keeping schools functioning during an extremely stressful time.

"We were in a time when staff were working seven days a week, passing out laptops or meals on the weekends, doing COVID testing and contact tracing, and doing anything else that was needed to keep our students safe," Britt said. "Our educators were grateful for flexible funding and encouraged by Education Secretary Miguel Cardona to utilize the funds for short-term strategies or long-term investments. Basically, whatever it took to keep schools open safely."

Union members don't dispute the need for staff stipends. They just want the money distributed more fairly, said Veronica Olivares, president of the local chapter of CSEA and a database specialist for the county office's school at juvenile hall. Union members spent months on the front lines of the pandemic and deserve stipends comparable to those managers received, she said.

"It's demoralizing. People are wondering why one person got $3,000, for example, while other people got nothing," Olivares said. "The inequity is so evident."

To rectify the situation, managers offered about $400,000 in stipends to union members, as well. That would bring the total amount of stipends to over $1 million. The two sides have not yet agreed on stipend amounts, but negotiations are continuing.

"Everyone wants to move on, at this point," Olivares said. "We just want to come to an agreement that's fair and leaves everyone feeling valued."

The California Teachers Association, which also endorsed challenger Castro, released a statement this week with comments from some local teachers union leaders lambasting Monroe's moves on the stipends.

"It's a true shame this is what our leadership has decided to do with public education. As educators, we are going to do what we have always done -- which is fight back to win the schools students deserve," Dublin Teachers Association President Robbie Kreitz said.

"Together, we are united in keeping accountability in Alameda County," added Castro Valley Teachers Association President Mark Mladinich. "Superintendent Monroe's attitude with all of this is a failure on her end as a leader. The irony in all of this is that the funds have been there all along to support our classrooms and students, and instead the funds are given to employees who have the least contact with our students."

Editor's notes: Pleasanton Weekly editor Jeremy Walsh contributed Tri-Valley local reactions within the story. This article was originally published in EdSource, a partner publication of Bay City News Service. You can read the story in its original presentation here.

A front row seat to local high school sports.

Check out our new newsletter, the Playbook.

Looking for more Livermore stories? The Livermore Vine will be your new source of vital news and information. Sign up to be among the first to get our daily local news headlines sent to your inbox for free.

Follow PleasantonWeekly.com and the Pleasanton Weekly on Twitter @pleasantonnews, Facebook and on Instagram @pleasantonweekly for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Your support is vital to us continuing to bring you political news. Become a member today.

COVID stipends cause outcry from unions at Alameda County Office of Education

Superintendent Monroe 'takes full responsibility' amid criticism of process for giving most money to management employees

by Carolyn Jones / EdSource /

Uploaded: Thu, May 19, 2022, 5:20 am

The superintendent of Alameda County apologized last week after her office spent about $600,000 in COVID relief funds on stipends for her staff, mostly managers who took on extra duties during the pandemic.

Giving the money to staff was allowed under the federal and state grants, but has riled union leaders who say managers -- and not union members -- got the bulk of the funds, and the process wasn't transparent or legal under the education code.

The payouts ranged from $200 to more than $26,000, depending on the amount of extra work the employee did. Tasks included COVID testing, contact tracing, distributing masks and overseeing logistics related to opening and closing school campuses.

The incident comes about three weeks before Superintendent L.K. Monroe faces re-election on June 7 for a third term. She is running against Alysse Castro, who's been endorsed by the California School Employees Association, which represents about half of the 210 employees of the Alameda County Office of Education.

At least eight managers who received stipends donated money to Monroe's re-election campaign, with amounts ranging from $100 to more than $2,500, according to campaign finance filings.

"Superintendent Monroe has acknowledged that the manner in which the stipends were disbursed has caused significant strife in the agency and with the agency's labor groups. She takes full responsibility for this," said county office spokeswoman Michelle Smith McDonald, who was among the managers who received a stipend.

The statement from the Alameda County Office of Education said its "leadership is working to be responsive, transparent with requested documentation and will be collaborating with our labor partners to provide compensation to all employees in the agency for their extraordinary commitment to our students and schools," she said. "As leaders, we live our ACOE values and use our mistakes as an opportunity to grow and do better by the amazing agency that we serve."

The county school board reviewed the stipends on May 10 but didn't take action. Under the state education code, county superintendents can't give stipends of more than $10,000 without board discussion.

Superintendent Monroe did not receive a stipend.

The Alameda County Office of Education provides support for Alameda County's 18 school districts, including budget oversight and professional development for teachers, and runs schools for students in juvenile detention or who are pregnant or parenting.

The office received about $15 million in COVID relief funds from the federal Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund and the California Department of Public Health during COVID.

Both grants allow for schools and districts to spend the money on staff who work on COVID-related tasks, ranging from student learning loss to COVID testing, and many did. In fact, Gov. Newsom and President Biden have both encouraged districts to spend the money on staff.

Kindra Britt, director of communications and strategy for the California County Superintendents Educational Services Association, said that COVID relief stipends played a crucial role in retaining staff and keeping schools functioning during an extremely stressful time.

"We were in a time when staff were working seven days a week, passing out laptops or meals on the weekends, doing COVID testing and contact tracing, and doing anything else that was needed to keep our students safe," Britt said. "Our educators were grateful for flexible funding and encouraged by Education Secretary Miguel Cardona to utilize the funds for short-term strategies or long-term investments. Basically, whatever it took to keep schools open safely."

Union members don't dispute the need for staff stipends. They just want the money distributed more fairly, said Veronica Olivares, president of the local chapter of CSEA and a database specialist for the county office's school at juvenile hall. Union members spent months on the front lines of the pandemic and deserve stipends comparable to those managers received, she said.

"It's demoralizing. People are wondering why one person got $3,000, for example, while other people got nothing," Olivares said. "The inequity is so evident."

To rectify the situation, managers offered about $400,000 in stipends to union members, as well. That would bring the total amount of stipends to over $1 million. The two sides have not yet agreed on stipend amounts, but negotiations are continuing.

"Everyone wants to move on, at this point," Olivares said. "We just want to come to an agreement that's fair and leaves everyone feeling valued."

The California Teachers Association, which also endorsed challenger Castro, released a statement this week with comments from some local teachers union leaders lambasting Monroe's moves on the stipends.

"It's a true shame this is what our leadership has decided to do with public education. As educators, we are going to do what we have always done -- which is fight back to win the schools students deserve," Dublin Teachers Association President Robbie Kreitz said.

"Together, we are united in keeping accountability in Alameda County," added Castro Valley Teachers Association President Mark Mladinich. "Superintendent Monroe's attitude with all of this is a failure on her end as a leader. The irony in all of this is that the funds have been there all along to support our classrooms and students, and instead the funds are given to employees who have the least contact with our students."

Editor's notes: Pleasanton Weekly editor Jeremy Walsh contributed Tri-Valley local reactions within the story. This article was originally published in EdSource, a partner publication of Bay City News Service. You can read the story in its original presentation here.

Comments

There are no comments yet. Please share yours below.

Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.