News

Fate of Livermore's Equity and Inclusion Working Group still undecided

City accepts new round of applications after recent controversy over group's flag discussion

The city of Livermore is accepting new applications for its Equity and Inclusion Working Group following a City Council update last week.

During the council's Jan. 11 regular meeting, city staff asked for direction from the council on next steps for the working group, including whether to reopen applications for more people to join.

"I think opening (the application period) back up will potentially make sense but I think that we do need to consider where is this going and again what is the goal?" Councilmember Brittni Kiick asked.

"Let's say we get 300 applicants; are we going to take 300 applicants? Are we going to limit down those 300 before we say absolutely 'yes'? Are there any restraints that we're considering putting on this?" Kiick continued, adding that she believes the group "absolutely should still exist," but the council should consider possible consequences of expanding it.

Following the meeting, the city reopened applications on Jan. 13 and will accept them through Friday.

What's local journalism worth to you?

Support PleasantonWeekly.com for as little as $5/month.

Learn more

When the public working group was initially formed last year, the Council Subcommittee Equity and Inclusion -- co-chaired by now-Mayor Bob Woerner and now-Vice Mayor Trish Munro -- accepted all 48 people who submitted applications by the Aug. 7 deadline. However, the current council has not yet decided whether it will take the same approach with the new set of applicants.

Munro proposed last week waiting until the council has appointed its fifth member before having a larger discussion about how the working group should move forward.

"We are right now four members; by the next meeting we'll be a full complement. This seems to me to be exceedingly important work that we're doing," Munro said.

"There seems to have been a little kerfuffle back in December that led to this becoming more contentious opening up than we might have enjoyed," she continued. "That said, it's opened up and we have applications and that's great; however, how we go forward with this seems to me to be a longer discussion that we should have when we have the full complement."

Last month, the working group was at the center of a social media-fueled controversy after notes from a Nov. 17 meeting were referenced in an article by pro-law enforcement website Law Enforcement Today, which suggested that the city was considering the Thin Blue Line flag -- which is used to express support for law enforcement, but is considered by others as a symbol of intimidation -- as a symbol of hate. At the time, Woerner and Munro said the notes had been taken out of context.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Sign up

As a result of the debate, several community members shared their input about the group during public comment at the Dec. 14 regular council meeting. Some expressed support for its efforts, while others called for it to be disbanded altogether.

Jackie Cota was one of the residents who spoke out against the working group in December (identifying herself at the time as Jackie Faith). She returned on Jan. 11 to echo her opposition to the group.

"This subcommittee made up of principals, vice principals, therapists and misguided activists have bought into the propaganda and academia-based lie that there is systemic racism born out of something they like to call white privilege," she said during public comment. "This is a bully tactic Marxists like to use to silence you."

Woerner clarified that the conversations and ideas that the working group has had so far have not been implemented in any form of policy or action by the council.

"We have to maybe reset our expectations in general as to what we can do and on what kind of time frame and how," Woerner said. "In other areas, we have advisory bodies and we have a structure; this one we created to hear from people and of course, we heard a lot."

"I would say at this stage, where we're at, is we've been listening to what people said, and I think we also want to clarify that the fact that we've listened is not the same thing as the council taking action, for sure, and it's not even the same thing as the subcommittee making a recommendation to the council to take action. We've done none of those things," the mayor added.

Woerner agreed with waiting until a fifth council member is appointed to have a more expansive discussion but he asked staff to develop some structural recommendations for council to consider at its next regular meeting, to be held on Monday (Jan. 25).

A complete recording of last week's meeting is available here and the Equity and Inclusion Working Group application can be found here.

Craving a new voice in Peninsula dining?

Sign up for the Peninsula Foodist newsletter.

Sign up now

Follow PleasantonWeekly.com and the Pleasanton Weekly on Twitter @pleasantonnews, Facebook and on Instagram @pleasantonweekly for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Fate of Livermore's Equity and Inclusion Working Group still undecided

City accepts new round of applications after recent controversy over group's flag discussion

by / Pleasanton Weekly

Uploaded: Wed, Jan 20, 2021, 10:19 am

The city of Livermore is accepting new applications for its Equity and Inclusion Working Group following a City Council update last week.

During the council's Jan. 11 regular meeting, city staff asked for direction from the council on next steps for the working group, including whether to reopen applications for more people to join.

"I think opening (the application period) back up will potentially make sense but I think that we do need to consider where is this going and again what is the goal?" Councilmember Brittni Kiick asked.

"Let's say we get 300 applicants; are we going to take 300 applicants? Are we going to limit down those 300 before we say absolutely 'yes'? Are there any restraints that we're considering putting on this?" Kiick continued, adding that she believes the group "absolutely should still exist," but the council should consider possible consequences of expanding it.

Following the meeting, the city reopened applications on Jan. 13 and will accept them through Friday.

When the public working group was initially formed last year, the Council Subcommittee Equity and Inclusion -- co-chaired by now-Mayor Bob Woerner and now-Vice Mayor Trish Munro -- accepted all 48 people who submitted applications by the Aug. 7 deadline. However, the current council has not yet decided whether it will take the same approach with the new set of applicants.

Munro proposed last week waiting until the council has appointed its fifth member before having a larger discussion about how the working group should move forward.

"We are right now four members; by the next meeting we'll be a full complement. This seems to me to be exceedingly important work that we're doing," Munro said.

"There seems to have been a little kerfuffle back in December that led to this becoming more contentious opening up than we might have enjoyed," she continued. "That said, it's opened up and we have applications and that's great; however, how we go forward with this seems to me to be a longer discussion that we should have when we have the full complement."

Last month, the working group was at the center of a social media-fueled controversy after notes from a Nov. 17 meeting were referenced in an article by pro-law enforcement website Law Enforcement Today, which suggested that the city was considering the Thin Blue Line flag -- which is used to express support for law enforcement, but is considered by others as a symbol of intimidation -- as a symbol of hate. At the time, Woerner and Munro said the notes had been taken out of context.

As a result of the debate, several community members shared their input about the group during public comment at the Dec. 14 regular council meeting. Some expressed support for its efforts, while others called for it to be disbanded altogether.

Jackie Cota was one of the residents who spoke out against the working group in December (identifying herself at the time as Jackie Faith). She returned on Jan. 11 to echo her opposition to the group.

"This subcommittee made up of principals, vice principals, therapists and misguided activists have bought into the propaganda and academia-based lie that there is systemic racism born out of something they like to call white privilege," she said during public comment. "This is a bully tactic Marxists like to use to silence you."

Woerner clarified that the conversations and ideas that the working group has had so far have not been implemented in any form of policy or action by the council.

"We have to maybe reset our expectations in general as to what we can do and on what kind of time frame and how," Woerner said. "In other areas, we have advisory bodies and we have a structure; this one we created to hear from people and of course, we heard a lot."

"I would say at this stage, where we're at, is we've been listening to what people said, and I think we also want to clarify that the fact that we've listened is not the same thing as the council taking action, for sure, and it's not even the same thing as the subcommittee making a recommendation to the council to take action. We've done none of those things," the mayor added.

Woerner agreed with waiting until a fifth council member is appointed to have a more expansive discussion but he asked staff to develop some structural recommendations for council to consider at its next regular meeting, to be held on Monday (Jan. 25).

A complete recording of last week's meeting is available here and the Equity and Inclusion Working Group application can be found here.

Comments

MichaelB
Registered user
Pleasanton Meadows
on Jan 20, 2021 at 1:56 pm
MichaelB, Pleasanton Meadows
Registered user
on Jan 20, 2021 at 1:56 pm

""I would say at this stage, where we're at, is we've been listening to what people said, and I think we also want to clarify that the fact that we've listened is not the same thing as the council taking action, for sure, and it's not even the same thing as the subcommittee making a recommendation to the council to take action. We've done none of those things," the mayor added."

I would say we are at the stage to stop rationalizing/spinning the divisive and inflammatory notes from your own subcommittee. How about clarifying that the City of Livermore had absolutely nothing to do with what happened to George Floyd and is not "systemically racist" instead?


Michael Austin
Registered user
Pleasanton Meadows
on Jan 20, 2021 at 3:55 pm
Michael Austin , Pleasanton Meadows
Registered user
on Jan 20, 2021 at 3:55 pm

It comes to my mind how the FBI, the top law enforcement unit in the country quickly assembled MEDI photos and videos and systematically arrested many of those involved with the riot on the DC capitol last week.

None of those resources were put into play for those rioters in the George Floyd riots. There is no recorded record of the FBI arresting anyone in the George Floyd riots.


Jackie C
Registered user
Livermore
on Jan 21, 2021 at 6:58 pm
Jackie C, Livermore
Registered user
on Jan 21, 2021 at 6:58 pm

Post removed because it contains false information.


MichaelB
Registered user
Pleasanton Meadows
on Jan 21, 2021 at 8:05 pm
MichaelB, Pleasanton Meadows
Registered user
on Jan 21, 2021 at 8:05 pm

"Let's say we get 300 applicants; are we going to take 300 applicants? Are we going to limit down those 300 before we say absolutely 'yes'? Are there any restraints that we're considering putting on this?" Kiick continued, adding that she believes the group "absolutely should still exist," but the council should consider possible consequences of expanding it."

No problem. Let's say if there any negative consequences, the council can give the same response (excuse) as before - comments/plans/recommendations/etc. from the working group "were taken out of context". Apparently no one considered the possible consequences of having a "working" group of left wing activists interpret "systemic racism" into whatever they wanted and then assume it was going to be accepted by city residents as "inclusive" and "welcoming" afterward?


Jackie C
Registered user
Livermore
on Jan 22, 2021 at 6:27 am
Jackie C, Livermore
Registered user
on Jan 22, 2021 at 6:27 am

Post removed because it contains false information.


Name hidden
Livermore

Registered user
on Jan 24, 2021 at 8:57 am
Name hidden, Livermore

Registered user
on Jan 24, 2021 at 8:57 am

Due to repeated violations of our Terms of Use, comments from this poster are automatically removed. Why?


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.

Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.