News

Sunol school bond Measure O trailing by a single vote

PUSD’s Measure M improves, still behind; Dublin, ACFD bonds too close to call

Many primary election contests moved that much closer to confirming their outcomes when the Alameda County Registrar of Voters’ Office released an updated batch of results on Saturday afternoon, but the margin for the Sunol school bond Measure O remains razor thin.

By just one vote, in fact.

Needing 55% voter approval to pass, the proposed $9.5 million bond for Sunol Glen Unified School District stands at 54.84% Yes and 45.16% No.

Given the small number of residents in SGUSD boundaries, those percentages translate to 51 votes Yes and 42 votes No -- meaning the difference between passing and failing is a single vote, if the current results were to hold.

There are still thousands of ballots left to count countywide -- mainly provisional ballots and vote-by-mail ballots that were postmarked on time but delayed in the postal system -- but it is unclear how many, if any, of the pending ballots are from Sunol voters.

What's local journalism worth to you?

Support PleasantonWeekly.com for as little as $5/month.

Learn more

On the ballot as Measure O, the $9.5 million facilities bond measure for SGUSD proposes to fund a series of improvements to classroom buildings, technology and infrastructure, as well as a brand-new multipurpose room, at the nearly century-old campus on Main Street that serves all of the students in the K-8 district.

If passed, it would be the district's first new bond issuance since 1999 and would come with a new property tax of $59 per $100,000 of assessed valuation.

County election officials said they still had an estimated 150,000 ballots left to process as of Sunday morning -- vote-by-mail, provisional, conditional and other ballots. That pending ballot total is countywide as election officials do not differentiate between city or community at this point in the process.

Election Night results represented early mail-in ballots, in-person early voting ballots and all ballots cast at precincts on March 3. The county released its next results updates on Friday and then again Saturday, including an influx of mail-in, provisional and conditional ballots that qualified.

Results will be updated each day now through the final count, according to Alameda County Registrar of Voters Tim Dupuis. The results must be finalized for certification by 30 days after Election Day.

Stay informed

Get daily headlines sent straight to your inbox.

Sign up

In other results

* Pleasanton Unified School District’s $323 million Measure M bond is still trailing, but improved slightly, after the results update from Saturday showed the bond measure now nearly five percentage points short of passing.

The new results represented an improvement for the Yes side -- an uptick of over 2% compared to Election Night -- that propelled them into the majority, but they were well behind the 55% approval threshold required.

As of Saturday, 8,265 PUSD voters were a Yes (50.95%) and 7,956 were a No (49.05%).

That represented a tightening of the race compared to Election Night results -- which were 51.41% No and 48.59% Yes.

Measure M seeks to be the PUSD’s second facilities bond since 2016 and proposes to usher in a new property tax of $43.10 per $100,000 of assessed valuation.

The scope of Measure M revenue would have funded work to "upgrade/construct classrooms and facilities to support science, technology, engineering, math, arts/music and accommodate growing student enrollment; improve safety/security systems; replace aging roofs, plumbing/electrical/HVAC systems; and improve access for students with disabilities," according to the ballot question.

* Dublin Unified School District’s $290 million Measure J bond swung toward approval for the first time but still remains too close to call as of Saturday.

The tally stood at 55.36% Yes (4,642 votes) and 44.64% No (3,743 votes) -- now just above the 55% threshold. The results update demonstrated a key uptick for the Yes side compared to the Election Night totals, which had Measure J behind at 53.82%.

Measure J proposes to be the fourth school bond in the past 16 years for the Dublin community still grappling with school overcrowding issues amid continued residential growth.

The bond issuance (and accompanying property tax of $50 per $100,000 of assessed valuation) would fund projects such as the second comprehensive high school, a new middle school and current campus upgrades.

* Still trailing but too close to call after Saturday’s update is Measure D, a proposed $90 million fire safety bond proposed by the Alameda County Fire Department to fund fire facilities projects in the unincorporated communities.

Needing a higher, two-thirds majority to pass, Measure D stood at 65.34% Yes (10,830 votes) and 34.66% No (5,745 votes).

The fire bond was on the ballot in unincorporated areas of the county, including parts of Pleasanton that are outside of the city limits.

* Measure P’s path to victory in Livermore only strengthened on Saturday, sitting at 66.07% Yes (13,171 votes) and 33.93% No (6,764 votes).

A Yes vote on the referendum measure was to support the hotel agreement development approved by the Livermore City Council to allow developer Presidio to build a three-story hotel with 125-135 rooms next to the Bankhead Theater on the east side of Livermore Avenue -- a key component to the city's downtown redevelopment plan.

Opponents had challenged that council approval with a referendum measure last summer, ultimately sending the question to voters citywide in the March 3 primary election.

* The countywide Measure C child care sales tax vote remains firmly in the simple majority, but question of victory threshold is still unclear and will likely be decided by the courts -- based on pending decisions on other cases that question whether certain sales tax measures could pass with a simple majority instead of the traditional two-thirds supermajority.

The results stood at 61.92% Yes and 38.08% on Saturday.

Measure C proposes to raise $150 million per year via a new half-cent sales tax across Alameda County for the next 20 years, with 80% of the funds supporting childcare, preschool and early education programs and 20% supporting pediatric health care.

* The lone statewide measure on the ballot, the Proposition 13 school facilities bond, remained in a trailing position as of Saturday.

The 2020 Prop 13 is a proposal from the State Legislature seeking voter authorization to issue $15 billion in state general obligation bonds to fund construction and modernization projects at public education facilities across California.

The tally for all of California is currently 54.8% No and 45.2% Yes, with passage needing just a simple majority. (That’s much different than how Prop 13 fared in Alameda County alone, where voters were 61.26% Yes and 38.74% No).

Craving a new voice in Peninsula dining?

Sign up for the Peninsula Foodist newsletter.

Sign up now

Follow PleasantonWeekly.com and the Pleasanton Weekly on Twitter @pleasantonnews, Facebook and on Instagram @pleasantonweekly for breaking news, local events, photos, videos and more.

Sunol school bond Measure O trailing by a single vote

PUSD’s Measure M improves, still behind; Dublin, ACFD bonds too close to call

by / Pleasanton Weekly

Uploaded: Sat, Mar 7, 2020, 4:50 pm
Updated: Sun, Mar 8, 2020, 3:51 pm

Many primary election contests moved that much closer to confirming their outcomes when the Alameda County Registrar of Voters’ Office released an updated batch of results on Saturday afternoon, but the margin for the Sunol school bond Measure O remains razor thin.

By just one vote, in fact.

Needing 55% voter approval to pass, the proposed $9.5 million bond for Sunol Glen Unified School District stands at 54.84% Yes and 45.16% No.

Given the small number of residents in SGUSD boundaries, those percentages translate to 51 votes Yes and 42 votes No -- meaning the difference between passing and failing is a single vote, if the current results were to hold.

There are still thousands of ballots left to count countywide -- mainly provisional ballots and vote-by-mail ballots that were postmarked on time but delayed in the postal system -- but it is unclear how many, if any, of the pending ballots are from Sunol voters.

On the ballot as Measure O, the $9.5 million facilities bond measure for SGUSD proposes to fund a series of improvements to classroom buildings, technology and infrastructure, as well as a brand-new multipurpose room, at the nearly century-old campus on Main Street that serves all of the students in the K-8 district.

If passed, it would be the district's first new bond issuance since 1999 and would come with a new property tax of $59 per $100,000 of assessed valuation.

County election officials said they still had an estimated 150,000 ballots left to process as of Sunday morning -- vote-by-mail, provisional, conditional and other ballots. That pending ballot total is countywide as election officials do not differentiate between city or community at this point in the process.

Election Night results represented early mail-in ballots, in-person early voting ballots and all ballots cast at precincts on March 3. The county released its next results updates on Friday and then again Saturday, including an influx of mail-in, provisional and conditional ballots that qualified.

Results will be updated each day now through the final count, according to Alameda County Registrar of Voters Tim Dupuis. The results must be finalized for certification by 30 days after Election Day.

In other results

* Pleasanton Unified School District’s $323 million Measure M bond is still trailing, but improved slightly, after the results update from Saturday showed the bond measure now nearly five percentage points short of passing.

The new results represented an improvement for the Yes side -- an uptick of over 2% compared to Election Night -- that propelled them into the majority, but they were well behind the 55% approval threshold required.

As of Saturday, 8,265 PUSD voters were a Yes (50.95%) and 7,956 were a No (49.05%).

That represented a tightening of the race compared to Election Night results -- which were 51.41% No and 48.59% Yes.

Measure M seeks to be the PUSD’s second facilities bond since 2016 and proposes to usher in a new property tax of $43.10 per $100,000 of assessed valuation.

The scope of Measure M revenue would have funded work to "upgrade/construct classrooms and facilities to support science, technology, engineering, math, arts/music and accommodate growing student enrollment; improve safety/security systems; replace aging roofs, plumbing/electrical/HVAC systems; and improve access for students with disabilities," according to the ballot question.

* Dublin Unified School District’s $290 million Measure J bond swung toward approval for the first time but still remains too close to call as of Saturday.

The tally stood at 55.36% Yes (4,642 votes) and 44.64% No (3,743 votes) -- now just above the 55% threshold. The results update demonstrated a key uptick for the Yes side compared to the Election Night totals, which had Measure J behind at 53.82%.

Measure J proposes to be the fourth school bond in the past 16 years for the Dublin community still grappling with school overcrowding issues amid continued residential growth.

The bond issuance (and accompanying property tax of $50 per $100,000 of assessed valuation) would fund projects such as the second comprehensive high school, a new middle school and current campus upgrades.

* Still trailing but too close to call after Saturday’s update is Measure D, a proposed $90 million fire safety bond proposed by the Alameda County Fire Department to fund fire facilities projects in the unincorporated communities.

Needing a higher, two-thirds majority to pass, Measure D stood at 65.34% Yes (10,830 votes) and 34.66% No (5,745 votes).

The fire bond was on the ballot in unincorporated areas of the county, including parts of Pleasanton that are outside of the city limits.

* Measure P’s path to victory in Livermore only strengthened on Saturday, sitting at 66.07% Yes (13,171 votes) and 33.93% No (6,764 votes).

A Yes vote on the referendum measure was to support the hotel agreement development approved by the Livermore City Council to allow developer Presidio to build a three-story hotel with 125-135 rooms next to the Bankhead Theater on the east side of Livermore Avenue -- a key component to the city's downtown redevelopment plan.

Opponents had challenged that council approval with a referendum measure last summer, ultimately sending the question to voters citywide in the March 3 primary election.

* The countywide Measure C child care sales tax vote remains firmly in the simple majority, but question of victory threshold is still unclear and will likely be decided by the courts -- based on pending decisions on other cases that question whether certain sales tax measures could pass with a simple majority instead of the traditional two-thirds supermajority.

The results stood at 61.92% Yes and 38.08% on Saturday.

Measure C proposes to raise $150 million per year via a new half-cent sales tax across Alameda County for the next 20 years, with 80% of the funds supporting childcare, preschool and early education programs and 20% supporting pediatric health care.

* The lone statewide measure on the ballot, the Proposition 13 school facilities bond, remained in a trailing position as of Saturday.

The 2020 Prop 13 is a proposal from the State Legislature seeking voter authorization to issue $15 billion in state general obligation bonds to fund construction and modernization projects at public education facilities across California.

The tally for all of California is currently 54.8% No and 45.2% Yes, with passage needing just a simple majority. (That’s much different than how Prop 13 fared in Alameda County alone, where voters were 61.26% Yes and 38.74% No).

Comments

Dear Editor
Laguna Oaks
on Mar 7, 2020 at 6:24 pm
Dear Editor, Laguna Oaks
on Mar 7, 2020 at 6:24 pm
9 people like this

Your story fails to indicate when the votes will be completely tallyed...or what percent of the votes have been counted. Only that it's an update of the count since Tuesday. When can we expect final results?


Kathleen Ruegsegger
Vintage Hills
on Mar 7, 2020 at 7:04 pm
Kathleen Ruegsegger, Vintage Hills
on Mar 7, 2020 at 7:04 pm
11 people like this

The registrar has 30 days to certify the election, doesn’t say how many votes have yet to be counted, and is complicated by people being allowed to register and vote at precincts on Election Day which all must be verified. So, it’s complicated. They will update from time to time at 4:30-5:00 p.m. That’s what I learned when I called Friday.


Michael Austin
Pleasanton Meadows
on Mar 7, 2020 at 7:43 pm
Michael Austin, Pleasanton Meadows
on Mar 7, 2020 at 7:43 pm
4 people like this

Weekly:
Do you know total number of ballots that were received by election officials.
The 8265 yes, the 7956 no, seems to indicate 35% of registered voters in Pleasanton.

Mail in ballots should be counted immediately upon receipt by election officials to eliminate counting weeks after the election. Why are they mail in ballots when they are ignored until after the election?


Jeremy Walsh, editor
another community
on Mar 7, 2020 at 9:53 pm
Jeremy Walsh, editor, another community
on Mar 7, 2020 at 9:53 pm
6 people like this

Thanks for your questions, Michael and Dear Editor. The Alameda County Registrar of Voters' Office has not publicly confirmed how many ballots are left to be counted and how many were received in this election. They did not respond to my emails today either.
Of course, any pending ballot totals they report are countywide; they've told us in the past they do not differentiate between city/community at this point in the process. We won't know Pleasanton-specific voter turnout data until the election is certified.
And Kathleen is right; we expect updated results to drop end-of-day throughout the process although the registrar's office has not confirmed the daily/weekly schedule with us yet.


Jeremy Walsh, editor
another community
on Mar 8, 2020 at 3:54 pm
Jeremy Walsh, editor, another community
on Mar 8, 2020 at 3:54 pm
4 people like this

I just updated the article after hearing back from Alameda County ROV Tim Dupuis: "We plan to post updates each day by 5:00 as long as there are a significant number of votes counted. We have, very roughly, 150,000 votes remaining (countywide). This is only an estimate. We are processing on a flow basis."


Sunol Glen Meaure O
Pleasanton Heights
on Mar 28, 2020 at 10:06 am
Sunol Glen Meaure O, Pleasanton Heights
on Mar 28, 2020 at 10:06 am
Like this comment

We do not encourage passage of Measure O. It will increase the taxes substantially on a very small number of people who live in our town, to fund things that Sunol Glen Elementary does not need. The school does not need to spend millions on a new cafeteria or a new auditorium. It needs new school leadership that reflects the wholesome hometown values of Sunol - honesty, integrity and respect of all people.


Pleasanton Parent
Pleasanton Meadows
on Mar 28, 2020 at 2:53 pm
Pleasanton Parent, Pleasanton Meadows
on Mar 28, 2020 at 2:53 pm
Like this comment

Funny how every school issued bond requests in the same election, why all together?

Seems like if companies did that they’d find some sort manipulation lawsuit


it's Official -
Laguna Oaks
on Mar 29, 2020 at 3:49 pm
it's Official - , Laguna Oaks
on Mar 29, 2020 at 3:49 pm
1 person likes this

The Alameda County Registrar of Voters has certified the election and the Yes on Measure O only received 51.13% of the votes. It needed 55% to pass, so this is another school bond that wasted precious school funds which could have been used for our schools. Can anyone tell me why, if polling is close, why would a school district decide to go to the ballot anyway? If they don't know you can win, then they should save OUR money and educate our students.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.