News


Pleasanton mayor, other East Bay leaders make demands of BART ahead of possible bond measure

State Sen, Glazer outlines concerns about BART's fiscal management

Pleasanton Mayor Jerry Thorne and other East Bay leaders met last week to chart a course necessary for BART leaders to earn their backing ahead of a potential November ballot measure to fund the transit system.

Headed by the Tri-Valley's State Senator, Steve Glazer (D-Orinda), the local leaders spoke outside the Walnut Creek BART station of their concerns about the transit agency's commitment to fiscal responsibility.

BART's board of directors last week indicated the agency plans to pursue a ballot measure for a bond of up to $4.5 billion for track and station improvements after a recent poll of likely Bay Area voters found it could reach the two-thirds approval necessary to pass.

"We have had decades of short-sighted financial decisions from management that have left the system at (a deficit of) billions of dollars," Glazer said.

"In the past few years ... it has gotten worse," Glazer added, citing a 2013 BART worker strike during labor negotiations and the later contract that gave the transit workers a raise.

In addition to Thorne, the mayors of Walnut Creek and Dublin and more than 30 other leaders signed on in support of a letter sent to BART officials that outlined demands.

Among them, Glazer said BART leadership needs to renegotiate and approve a labor contract immediately that reduces costs while also agreeing to end management compensation increases.

Short of that, Glazer said voters should refuse in November to approve the proposed bond for infrastructure improvements.

"Why should we reward bad behavior with billions of dollars in new taxes and expect a different result?" Glazer said.

When asked whether he thought it was realistic to ask unions to negotiate for a contract again ahead of the current one expiring in 2017, Glazer expressed confidence that it was.

Glazer clarified he was not asking for a reversal of salary choices already made, but said those choices are something the public needs to be aware of before agreeing to an infusion of funding.

"It's just not fair for them to ask us to spend billions to trust them again," he said. "(Their) finances are as dirty as a BART train. We need them to clean up their act."

But BART officials said what has been demonstrated historically by the transit system's leadership is fiscal prudence.

"Since the 1970s, we have diverted revenue for operating funds toward capital needs," BART spokeswoman Alicia Trost said. "Still, the need to reinvest in our 40-year-old infrastructure is great."

That's why BART officials are seeking funds that would be dedicated to restoring the decaying transit system.

"And (these funds) have rules for what it can be spent on," Trost said. "It can't be used for salaries or benefits. It can't even be for new trains. ... It's for core infrastructure improvement needs."

Another demand made of BART leaders is that they eliminate a ban placed on training certain worker replacements in the case of a strike.

Trost said it would not be possible to enact that change since it was brought about as part of the labor contract in effect until June 2017.

Glazer, who has previously sought a legislative ban on transit worker strikes, emphasized the importance of completing salary negotiations in advance of contracts expiring to reduce the risk of work stoppages.

Pleasanton City Councilman Jerry Pentin said it was this aspect that was particularly important for East Bay cities.

"Down in Pleasanton, we have an end-of-line BART station and we get all the traffic from San Joaquin County," he said. "It's one of the worst commutes in the Bay Area now."

Unions representing BART employees were not immediately available to comment on the remarks by the politicians Wednesday.

Trost expressed a hope that the politicians who spoke today can find a way to collaborate with BART.

"Now, more than ever, we want to be working together with our elected officials," she said. "We should be looking to improve mobility within the Bay Area ... and reinvest in our transit infrastructure."

— Bay City News Service

Comments

9 people like this
Posted by Mike
a resident of Amador Valley High School
on Feb 9, 2016 at 11:33 am

Vote No.
Make a quick search online and find out the fares for the most populated regions using similar transit systems. NYC fare: $2.75, Chicago L train fare: $2.25, Atlanta MARTA fare:$2.50 with 4 free transfers included. Bart fares need a calculator program based on where you get on to where you want to get off the train. On BART from Oakland 12th street to SF Embarcadero the fare is $3.45 one way. From Dublin/Pleasanton station to SF Embarcadero Station:$6.50 one way. For a family of four going to downtown SF from Pleasanton its $52.00 round trip on BART.
Is Bart service that much better than the others? No Way. Its cheaper to drive your entire family, pay the bridge toll,parking fees,and gas cost than pay ridiculous BART fares. Riding BART should be far less expensive as it is reducing the amount of cars/traffic and pollution in the Bay Area.
Vote No.


1 person likes this
Posted by What the People Want
a resident of Birdland
on Feb 10, 2016 at 12:03 pm

Historically, the tax payers rarely turn down a new tax or bond, no matter how incompetent the bureaucrats are, or how silly the project (think High Speed Rail).

The majority of the voters in Oakland County (aka Alameda County), enjoy taxes. It is our culture.

As far as government worker union contracts go, much of the same reasoning applies. The majority of voters don't have any issue with how much more government workers are paid compared to those in private industry.

Since we can't stop the BART stupidity, we should devote our energies to ending their refusal to provide adequate parking at BART stations. A lot of local residents see the future(?) Livermore station as one whose limited parking will be devoted to residents of the central valley who have never paid into the BART through property taxes or sales taxes.


5 people like this
Posted by Map
a resident of Del Prado
on Feb 10, 2016 at 6:06 pm

Vote NO and keep the money away from those Bart management thieves!! It's the worst transit system that I have ever ridden on here in the USA and overseas, overpriced, filthy cars and stations, overcrowded cars and no parking available for us locals, get your act together, we can't keep throwing money on their problems fixing this needs to start at the top!!


4 people like this
Posted by Steve
a resident of Sycamore Heights
on Feb 12, 2016 at 8:30 am

BART has been plagued for years with very poor management. They have allowed the infrastructure and service standards to fail at the expense of salaries. It is one of the last places left in the country where a person with only a GED can receive a six figure salary, full benefits and a pension. At that salary they should be able to hire drivers with graduate degrees.

You can travel anywhere across Paris on clean new trains for U$1.90. BART needs to replace management at the same time they renegotiate union contracts.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Couples: A Relationship Test . . .
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 784 views

Bringing great burgers to downtown Pleasanton
By Tim Hunt | 4 comments | 710 views

Making the Most of Your College Visit
By Elizabeth LaScala | 2 comments | 196 views