News


Pleasanton's water, sewer rates now up by 6.7%

Increase averages $10.73 per bimonthly billing period

Sewer and water bills costs were raised by an overall average of 6.7% last week, amounting to increase an average of $10.73 per bimonthly billing period for Pleasanton residents and businesses.

The increase was approved earlier this month in a 5-0 vote by the City Council on the recommendation of Emily Wagner, retired finance director who stayed on to handle revisions to the city's water policies. She said the higher rates are needed to offset water and sewer costs not fully covered by ratepayers.

In Pleasanton, the water and sewer operation is an "Enterprise Fund," meaning that the funds are 100% fee-based. Costs should not be covered by the city's General Fund or city taxpayers.

Yet a study showed that during the past five years, the city was undercharging water customers, capturing only 87% of the costs associated with purchasing water from the Zone 7 Water Agency, which provides drinking water to the city.

"While the city has been able to absorb these increases, by not passing through 100% of the Zone 7 rate, this is now placing a significant strain on the city's water enterprise, which over the years has not been, nor should be, reliant on the General Fund to operate," Wagner said.

Also, due to the ongoing drought, state mandates to reduce potable water consumption by 20% per capita over the next five years and the need to replace and repair aging infrastructure, rates needed to be raised.

With the new rates, residential water users will see an average increase of $10.73 per bimonthly billing period. Seniors will continue to receive a 20%, but now only if their water consumption does not exceed 30Ccf in a bimonthly billing period, down from the current 40Ccf level.

Even with the increases, Pleasanton will continue to have the lowest combined water and sewer rates in the Bay Area. For customers using 20Ccf of water during a typical bimonthly billing period, Pleasanton users will now pay $65.62, compared to $81.92 in Livermore and $97.94 in Dublin.

For those using 40Ccf, considered moderate consumption, Pleasanton ratepayers will pay $120.78, while Livermore customers pay $160.22 and Dublin $170.36.

For high users at 60Ccf, Pleasanton ratepayers will pay $180.43, with Livermore at $265.90 and Dublin at $247.96.

The national average consumption is 23Ccf. A single Ccf of water equates to 748 gallons.

In their bimonthly sewer bills, which come with the water bills, Pleasanton customers will pay $77.28, compared to $86.76 in Livermore and a lower rate of $63.73 in Dublin.

Staffing, chemicals and electrical costs are higher than Dublin's due to charges associated with pumping Pleasanton sewerage to the Dublin San Ramon Services District treatment plant on Johnson Drive next to I-680.

Although the proposed 6.7% rate increase will help Pleasanton achieve a 100% pass-through to cover its operating costs, council members recommended doing more to encourage greater conservation. That included making the discount for seniors effective only if they use no more than 30Ccf in a billing period.

Along with higher water and sewer rates, those who live in Ruby Hill will see a higher increase in their sewer fees, moving from $4.32 to $12.60. This administrative fee is charged to Ruby Hill customers to pay for the city of Pleasanton to maintain the sewer system, which pipes the sewage to Livermore for treatment.

Thursday's rate increases may not be the last. The city has allowed annual cost of living (CPI) adjustments since 2010. The need for them is reviewed by staff annually prior to implementation. The purpose is to make a rate "change" in the first year of the five year cycle, and then follow up with rate "adjustments" each following year tied to the CPI. This avoids large abrupt increases and smooths any potential future increases over time in smaller increments.

The increased based on the CPI as the start of this new five-year rate structure is estimated to be 2.5% on Jan. 1.

At last week's meeting, the council agreed to consider a drought surcharge rate if it becomes necessary.

The drought rates are now a part of the Master Fee schedule but nothing will be implemented unless and until the council needs to take further action if the determination is made that additional revenue will be needed to replenish lost revenue during the drought.

At this time, the council determined, it is not necessary to levy the additional drought surcharge.

Comments

6 people like this
Posted by Sam
a resident of Stoneridge
on Oct 13, 2015 at 10:10 pm

How could water rates go up for water that is hard, looks and tastes crappy and stains cars so badly.
As usual, you pay high prices and you get poor quality and service. There is no limit to their greed. Hopeless and useless PLS. City Council!


3 people like this
Posted by Ed
a resident of Pleasanton Meadows
on Oct 14, 2015 at 6:45 am

I need water and I need sewer service so what can I do? They are the only game in town.


3 people like this
Posted by Tired of the Nanny State
a resident of Gatewood
on Oct 15, 2015 at 10:41 am

Maybe I am getting some other city's water bill. Here on Mohr Ave., my July-August bi monthly bill of 30 units came to $171.92-- way above the 40 unit cost of $120.78 cited in the article. My May-June 15 unit bill came to $123.78, close to twice the $65.62 price noted for 20 bi monthly units. What is going on here? Are others seeing the same pricing noted in these price hike articles or is it just me getting hosed?


2 people like this
Posted by kbenson
a resident of Bordeaux Estates
on Oct 15, 2015 at 5:17 pm

Reduce water consumption and get rate increase.

When/if water levels get back to "normal" and folks use more of it, They (water co.) will decrease rates lol

I suppose the money has to come from somewhere. (not reflected in my last 3 (non-increase) annual salary rate)


7 people like this
Posted by Penny watcher
a resident of Beratlis Place
on Oct 15, 2015 at 9:50 pm

To "Tired of the Nanny State" - what is reported in this article is only the CITY part of your water bill - there is another very significant part and that is a pass through of fees imposed by ZONE 7 ....and guess what??? Zone 7 is proposing to raise their fees by 36% next Wednesday - UNLESS we all get out to their Board meeting and tell them "HELL NO!!!" To make matters worse Zone 7 is exempt from Proposition 218 so not only do they not need to notify you of the pending rate increase - you have no legal way to protest

The City Council of Pleasanton has already gone on record directly with Zone 7 in protest but has been 100% rebuffed. Zone 7 is totally Stiff-arming the people who pay the bills.

The Grand Jury looked into that agency and said they are not open to the public, not transparent and spend money on projects without justification. Someone needs to do something but no one is stepping up to the plate - certainly not the Alameda County Board of Supervisors who supposedly oversee Zone 7. No way the legislature is going to get into a local issue.

I feel totally helpless - maybe it is time to start a ballot initiative to simply dissolve that agency


Like this comment
Posted by JayBee
a resident of Pleasanton Valley
on Oct 19, 2015 at 10:29 am

Since I obviously need water and sewer service, I have no control of "how" the rate structure is calculated. However, I have cut back tremendously in using city-supplied water, so why the rate increase?


Like this comment
Posted by Damon
a resident of Foothill Knolls
on Oct 19, 2015 at 5:18 pm

@JayBee: "However, I have cut back tremendously in using city-supplied water, so why the rate increase"

Probably because there are large fixed costs to supplying water so if everyone dramatically cuts back on water use then rates have to go up in order to keep revenues from plummeting.


Like this comment
Posted by Jerry
a resident of Downtown
on Oct 19, 2015 at 6:55 pm

They need to lay off a few folks.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Couples: Wanting, Yet Missing One Another
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 719 views

Superintendent's new contract may portend difficult employee negotiations
By Tim Hunt | 7 comments | 489 views

Scott Raty bows out as CEO of Pleasanton Chamber
By Jeb Bing | 0 comments | 326 views

 

Nominations due by Sept. 17

Pleasanton Weekly and DanvilleSanRamon.com are once again putting out a call for nominations and sponsorships for the annual Tri-Valley Heroes awards - our salute to the community members dedicated to bettering the Tri-Valley and the lives of its residents.

Nomination form