News

Another look at Tuesday's Whitman-Brown debate

Brokaw uses broken ankle to describe state of California condition

Leaning on crutches, Tom Brokaw hopped into the center of the stage at Dominican University in San Rafael Tuesday night to open the third and final televised gubernatorial debate between Jerry Brown and Meg Whitman. Before the cameras began rolling, the newscaster and debate moderator used his broken ankle as a metaphor for the condition of the Golden State.

"We're both broken at the moment," he said. "The difference is I hope to be repaired before the beginning of the year."

No one expects California's problems – a 12.4 percent unemployment rate, a public school system ranked at the bottom of the 50 states, a $19 billion budget deficit, illegal immigration so rampant that the Republican candidate herself employed an undocumented housekeeper for nine years – to be fixed as quickly as Brokaw's ankle. And the two candidates offered little in the way of concrete solutions to the state's daunting problems during their hour-long debate on the campus of the private San Rafael university.

Mostly, with just three weeks left until voters weigh in on the tightly contested race, the ex-eBay CEO and the attorney general jabbed at each other's weak spots. Brown questioned how much of her own money his billionaire opponent would save under her plan to eliminate capital-gains taxes. Whitman rebuked the former two-term governor for his lukewarm apology after a Brown campaign worker who did not realize she was being taped was heard on a leaked voice-mail message calling Whitman a "whore."

"If you like the process we have in California, you should elect Jerry Brown," Whitman told the audience. "It will be the same old, same old."

Brown attacked Whitman's proposal for a temporary guest-worker program as "basically treating people from Mexico as semi-serfs."

A Dominican student walked out of hall after the debate saying: "I don't know how much debating was going on as opposed to bickering."

Outside the debate hall, supporters of each of the candidates screamed slogans over one another. Third-party candidates and people holding signs saying, "I am Nicky," referring to Nicky Diaz, the housekeeper Whitman fired after learning she was in this country illegally, began gathering to protest two and a half hours before the debate. Green Party supporters wearing green gags around their mouths chanted, "Let Laura debate."

Not only did Dominican and NBC, hosts of the debate, bar Green Party candidate Laura Wells from participating in the debate, she was arrested when she tried to enter the hall to watch it.

Wearing a green shirt with white stars, Larry Bragman, vice mayor of Fairfax and a Green Party member, demonstrated alongside Wells and introduced her and Marnie Glickman, co-chair of the Marin County Green Party, to someone who gave the two tickets to go into the hall. After Wells and Glickman, who lives in San Rafael, made their way through one security barrier, and they were standing on the stairs a few feet away from the auditorium entrance, Glickman said a plainclothes security guard stopped them.

Wells, wearing a bright green shirt and a black skirt, refused to step down from the stairs, and security officers, and plainclothes police officers surrounded her a little more than an hour before the debate's start. "I'm a candidate," she said, her voice rising as a security guard held her arm. "I even won my primary. We want to have solutions, not the status quo."

About half a dozen officers led Wells to a squad car. A San Rafael police press release says officers arrested the 62-year-old Green Party candidate for trying to enter the hall with someone else's ticket. Wells, the release says, presented a ticket issued to someone else and refused to relinquish it to campus security when asked to do so.

She was cited for trespassing, released and is scheduled to appear in Marin County Superior Court on Nov. 2 – Election Day.

"Laura's arrest epitomizes the poverty of a political culture which has abandoned youth, the unemployed and the foreclosed," Bragman said in an email message. "In these difficult days, California needs more voices and more choices if it is ever to progress beyond the wall of political conformity, which is crushing its future."

Other politicians were given tickets to the event. All the members of the San Rafael City Council received tickets, as did members of the Marin County Board of Supervisors.

Congresswoman Lynn Woolsey, Senator Dianne Feinstein, Assemblyman Jared Huffman attended.

The university distributed nearly 800 tickets through a lottery, but some audience members said they were offered the tickets without applying. Each of the candidate's supporters was supposed to get 10 tickets. Brown gave one of his to 15-year-old Ethan Borrasso, a student at Oakland Military Institute, who sat next to his proud mother in his dress military uniform.

Brown founded the institute as a charter school in 2001, when he was mayor of Oakland.

After the debate, Supervisor Steve Kinsey pronounced Brokaw the winner. "They were punchy questions, even if you didn't get punchy answers," Kinsey said.

Brokaw kicked off the debate by quoting President John Kennedy's inaugural request: "Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country" and asking the candidates to tell Californians what sacrifices they would have to make.

Whitman deflected the question and talked instead about coming to California 30 years ago with her newlywed husband and living the California dream, a dream she says is now broken, and she can fix. Before her time was up, Whitman did add: "There's going to have to be some shared sacrifice." But she did not say what the sacrifice might be.

Brown offered no more specifics. "We do have to make some tough decisions, live within our means," he said. "We're going to have to rise about the poisonous partisanship."

But the partisanship continued unabated Tuesday night.

When Brown fumbled, intending to say he had the backing of the police chiefs but instead saying, "I've got the police chiefs in my back . . ." and stopped to correct himself, Whitman laughed and interjected that her opponent meant to say "in his back pocket."

After passionately advocating for federal immigration reform, Brown said he did not want to get into the uproar over Whitman's housekeeper but launched right into it.

"We have millions of people here illegally," he said. "They're in the shadows. We need comprehensive immigration reform at the federal level. We need to think about this very carefully – not just from a political point of view but from a human point of view. These are real people, mothers, dads and kids. They have this fear, the fear that [Whitman's housekeeper had.

"It's kind of a sorry tale. After working for her for nine years, [Whitman didn't even get her a lawyer."

Nicky Diaz, Whitman's former housekeeper, has become a symbol of the national immigration quandary. Whitman says she hired Diaz, who is from Mexico, through an employment agency and was under the impression she had the legal documents necessary to work in the United States. In June 2009, when Whitman learned Diaz had forged her documents, she fired her on the spot.

"It's not fair that we work hard and then get thrown away like garbage with no thought about what will happen to us," Diaz said in a news conference.

A couple of Spanish-speaking women carrying signs saying, "I am Nicky" assembled with their children outside the debate hall.

Alondra Torres held a sign saying, "No Megusta." The 14-year-old Santa Rosa middle school student accused Whitman of lying and trying to buy votes. "Jerry Brown was with Cesar Chavez," she said, "and we want it to be the same story as it used to be."

Contact Ronnie Cohen at ronniecohen@comcast.net.

Comments

Like this comment
Posted by Concerned Californian
a resident of Valley Trails
on Oct 14, 2010 at 12:01 pm

Nicky Diaz is an issue manufacturered by Jerry Brown because instead of having better, more compelling ideas about how to fix California; he can only launch personal attacks against Meg. And what's interesting is that he's stated he wouldn't deport Ms. Diaz - meaning he's admitting that as Attorney General he doesn't want to enforce parts of the law he doesn't agree with. Does that mean as Governor, he'd only follow the California state constitution when he agrees with it?

Meg has framed the debate around pension reform, job creation and smaller, better government. How can someone who is financed entirely by unions who has been a career government employee turn around fix the system? That's like putting Dick Cheney in charge of a Haliburton fraud investigation. And where are the specific on his "green jobs" plan - a plan that he himself admits will only address 3% of California's economy?

Additionally, when Mayor of Oakland, Union Brown stated that low-income housing mandates were a "tax on developers," yet as Attorney General he's sued Pleasanton to force us to have low-income housing. Beware the politician who says one thing and then does another.


Like this comment
Posted by Member
a resident of Amador Valley High School
on Oct 15, 2010 at 10:29 am

It is time for Jerry Brown to retire and ride off into the sunset. Brown's campaign obviously manufactured the Nicky Diaz thing as a way to try to derail Meg Whitman. That was dirty politics. Brown's response about that at the debate was pathetic.
I can't think of one good thing that Jerry Brown has done for the state in 40 years.
Give Meg Whitman a chance. She is obviously very bright, articulate, successful, etc. She knows how to get results.


Like this comment
Posted by UNcharted territory
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on Oct 15, 2010 at 8:34 pm

So Meg charged into UNcharted territory....new concept never launched by man or woman. I'd say she did a pretty good job !! SO, she succeeded like most every American would like to do, She did not INHERIT money, she did not MARRYw money, she EARNED it ! did you get rich breaking into a new field !! Go girl ! Oprah isn't the only female to break records....both made Forbes 400...takes special people to be that accomplished !


Like this comment
Posted by Mike
a resident of Highland Oaks
on Oct 17, 2010 at 4:38 pm

I'm going with Brown, mainly, but not exclusively, because he won't give in to the police union on pensions. We share a border with Mexico, and people have been crossing it for generations - nothing new there. Pensions, on the other hand, have gotten way out of hand and are doing tangible damage to our fiscal health at the city, county and state levels.

This problem needs fixing first.


Like this comment
Posted by Dark Helmet
a resident of another community
on Oct 20, 2010 at 11:24 am

Being lied to for 9 years and having been made to look like a fool and all any one cares about is the liar rather than the one who is at fault. The lady deserved to be fired, all property confiscated and deported that day.

Guess what, Mexico is a place, not a race. There are legal ways to come here, use them and be a part of America, not a parasite criminal.


Like this comment
Posted by Gary Schwaegerle
a resident of Downtown
on Oct 22, 2010 at 1:03 pm

Gary Schwaegerle is a registered user.

We must be Grateful to Meg; many are saying she will not Win. So let us say "Thank You very much for providing her portion $162 million dollar "Stimulus Package" contribution to "The Kalifornia Economy" For those that work in Political campaigning, Media, printing, air time, photographers, News People, Fuel, tires, Restaurants, Motels & more. "THANK YOU! Meg Whitman for Giving Back to California where Dreams can Come True!" Sincerely, Gary Schwaegerle


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Couples: Do you Really Agree or are you Afraid of not Agreeing?
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 673 views

Castlewood may consider selling Valley course for development
By Tim Hunt | 6 comments | 478 views

 

Pleasanton Readers' Choice ballot is here

It's time to decide what local business is worthy of the title "Pleasanton Readers' Choice" — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 20th. Stay tuned for the results in the June 29th issue of the Pleasanton Weekly.

VOTE HERE