News

BART riders warned to prepare for strike, but date not certain

91% of one union's membership votes to walk out, another considering it

Bay Area transportation officials are urging BART riders to plan alternative methods of getting to and from work in the event of a strike by the system's employees.

A strike became a distinct possibility Tuesday with one union voting in favor of authorizing a strike if necessary and another was scheduled to conclude voting Tuesday night.

Ninety-one percent of BART workers with the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Local 3993, which represents about 200 middle managers, voted in a secret ballot in favor of authorizing their union leaders to call for a strike if both sides do not come to an agreement at the conclusion of negotiation discussions at the end of this month.

Local 3993 president Jean Hamilton Tuesday said the vote is standard procedure as union leaders and BART management move forward in the negotiation process.

"This vote does not mean that we will automatically go on strike," Hamilton said. "It just indicates that membership is solidly behind union leaders."

AFSCME, along with the Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1555, which represents 960 station agents, train operators and foreworkers, and Service Employees International Union Local 1021, which represents 1,200 mechanics, custodians, safety inspectors and clerical employees, comprise the three largest of BART's five unions.

Leaders for all three said more time is likely necessary to reach a new labor agreement and accused the transit agency's executives of asking riders and employees to suffer the consequences of their financial mismanagement.

According to Hamilton, BART executives are conveying that the only way to close their budget gap is to raise fares and take away job and retirement security from employees.

BART spokesman Linton Johnson said BART unions have yet to agree to a single major cost-saving proposal designed to help close the agency's $250 million deficit over the next four years.

"As of yesterday (Monday) afternoon they have not responded to any of our proposals. They've asked for more clarification and we gave them everything they've asked for," Johnson said.

Comments

Like this comment
Posted by Stacey
a resident of Amberwood/Wood Meadows
on Jun 24, 2009 at 7:34 am

Stacey is a registered user.

This story was on sfgate too. Web Link

"Management's goal is to find $100 million in labor savings to help balance the budget, the bulk of which would come in the form of diminished health and pension benefits."

These unions are ready to go on strike, during an historic recession, over benefits and generous pensions while the public will be paying a 6% fare increase with no real choice in the matter. But it's for the BART riders!


Like this comment
Posted by Joey
a resident of Mission Park
on Jun 24, 2009 at 4:15 pm

They are testing the waters, and losing in the court of public sentiment. I suspect at the end of the day they will back down and there will be no strike.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Couples: Wanting, Yet Missing One Another
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 836 views

Superintendent's new contract may portend difficult employee negotiations
By Tim Hunt | 7 comments | 604 views

Scott Raty bows out as CEO of Pleasanton Chamber
By Jeb Bing | 0 comments | 361 views

 

Nominations due by Sept. 17

Pleasanton Weekly and DanvilleSanRamon.com are once again putting out a call for nominations and sponsorships for the annual Tri-Valley Heroes awards - our salute to the community members dedicated to bettering the Tri-Valley and the lives of its residents.

Nomination form