News

Environmental groups lose bid to protect specific longfin smelt

Feds agree to make broader assessment to see if future restrictions necessary

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announced Wednesday that the population of longfin smelt in the San Francisco Bay and Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta will not be protected under the federal Endangered Species Act.

The announcement came in response to a petition filed in August 2007 by environmental organizations that had sought protection for a distinct population segment of the longfin smelt, a species that is up to 5 inches long.

The Bay Institute, as well as the Center for Biological Diversity and the Natural Resources Defense Council, had sought to protect the longfin smelt of the Bay-Delta, which recent surveys have concluded are at record low levels.

Al Donner, spokesman for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, said the agency could not conclude that the fish were genetically different or physically isolated from other longfin smelt further up the Pacific Coast. The fish live in estuaries spanning from the Bay Area to Alaska, according to Donner.

Lisa Belenky, an attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity, said the agency "pretty much ignored the science that was provided in the petition."

Donner cited a 2007 report by Bay Institute conservation biologist Jonathan Rosenfield titled "Population Dynamics and Distribution Patterns of Longfin Smelt in the San Francisco Estuary" as "one of the studies that indicated (to the agency) that the populations do go out into the currents" of the ocean.

However, Rosenfield said Wednesday the fact that the fish migrate out into the ocean is "not news to anybody", but asked "how are those fish coming back (to the Bay Area) if the current is going north? What does that have to do with sustaining the population here?"

"If anything, that makes it more distinct, and makes it more necessary to conserve here if this population is crucial to maintaining the population up the coast," he said.

Rosenfield estimated that the longfin smelt population in the Bay-Delta was "about 1 percent of what it was 20 or 25 years ago," and that the main harm to the species has been done by the diversion of freshwater in the Delta.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service also announced Wednesday that it would seek additional information for a broader assessment of the longfin smelt that could lead to future action to protect the population throughout its range.

However, Rosenfield was skeptical given the outcome of Wednesday's decision, saying that the agency "couldn't call me even though they rely on my research and had over a year and a half to confirm that line of reasoning with me."

Bay City News,Jeb Bing

Comments

Like this comment
Posted by stevep
a resident of Parkside
on Apr 9, 2009 at 9:48 am

stevep is a registered user.

Does this mean that humans will be able to have drinking water available again since they may be able to start the Delta pumps up again?
How dare the Fish and Wildlife Service favor people over fish.


Like this comment
Posted by Jim
a resident of Valley Trails
on Apr 20, 2009 at 12:05 am

I say throw the fish and wildlife people and the lawyers from the Sierra Club in the delta and then start the pumps


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Couples: Drop Your Keyboard!
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 5,378 views

 

Nominations due by Sept. 17

Pleasanton Weekly and DanvilleSanRamon.com are once again putting out a call for nominations and sponsorships for the annual Tri-Valley Heroes awards - our salute to the community members dedicated to bettering the Tri-Valley and the lives of its residents.

Nomination form