Developer fees increase cost of housing | Tim Talk | Tim Hunt | PleasantonWeekly.com |

Local Blogs

Tim Talk

By Tim Hunt

E-mail Tim Hunt

About this blog: I am a native of Alameda County, grew up in Pleasanton and currently live in the house I grew up in that is more than 100 years old. I spent 39 years in the daily newspaper business and wrote a column for more than 25 years in add...  (More)

View all posts from Tim Hunt

Developer fees increase cost of housing

Uploaded: May 4, 2023
It’s been more than 50 years since California voters overwhelming passed Proposition 13 and locked in predictable property taxes at a time when they threatened to run amuck with rapidly increasing property values. Those home values are but a fraction of what they are today, but the measure shifted how local governments do business.
The mantra became that any residential growth must pay its own way with staff time and other fees. Those fees, imposed by a variety of agencies have climbed steadily over the years, particularly as government agencies maintained their generous (to understate it) benefits and then started to pay salaries equivalent to or more than the private sector.
Affordable housing has been a buzzword and sought after goal for decades with cities such as Pleasanton imposing mandates that developers set aside a portion of their projects for affordable units or pay a fee.
This came to mind late last year when the Pleasanton school district trustees, fresh off a successful bond measure campaign, raised their developer fees to the state maximum of $4.79 per square foot for residential construction and 78 cents for commercial and industrial projects.
Consultants delivered a report that found the schools were over capacity so there was a need for additional facilities.
What piqued my interest is that district enrollment has fallen by about 700 students over the past several years. When a prior bond measure passed in 2016, part of the money was targeted for an additional elementary school or an expansion at Donlon School. Given the enrollment trend, the district has shelved that project.
School fees are paid directly to the school district, while the city collects all other fees such as those for water (Zone 7) or sewer (Dublin San Ramon Services District). I asked Pamela Ott, assistant city manager, what Pleasanton fees total and she responded in 2020, it was $160,000 for a 3,000-square-foot new home. School fees add nearly $15,000 to that cost or about 10% more.
In San Ramon, for a 2,000-square-foot home, they were about $78,000. In Dublin, the newer eastside with more improvements fees were $52,000 versus about $43,500 on the westside, Again, these do not include school fees or costs of staff to review the project.
If a developer is building a home designed to sell for $2 million, the hefty fees can be folded into the cost without blinking. If the goal is to build something more affordable, then fees figure in directly.
Some cities will waive them for affordable units to encourage construction and to strive to diversify the pricing in their housing stock. With the soaring interest rates housing prices have come down because there’s less purchasing power and potential buyers are leery.
The reality is that in desirable communities such as the Tri-Valley there needs to be more construction to keep pace with job growth in this vibrant area. Units may well need to be smaller with costs lowered that way. Builders already are building both attached and single-family units on much smaller lots than were routinely used in the 1970s-1990s when many of the older subdivisions were developed.
During the lockdown, these were highly desirable to people leaving the densely populated cities because they had backyards.
Moving forward, here’s hoping the Federal Reserve’s latest interest hike tames the inflation and the focus can shift back to constructing more units to increase supply.


Local Journalism.
What is it worth to you?

Comments

Posted by Michael Austin , a resident of Pleasanton Meadows,
on May 4, 2023 at 9:19 am

Michael Austin is a registered user.

It would be advantages for everyone to bulldoze the century house, turn that lot into stack and pack housing for all those that have a need for a home.

It was noted in the council meeting Tuesday evening that there is no one on staff researching, writing applications for government grants. It was stated that person is full time in planning.

It was also noted that all pools in Pleasanton are covered or must be, pending new regulations. I have been up in single engine flying around over Pleasanton. There is not a single pool covered.

All new building in Pleasanton will be required have solar panels. That is not consistent with Public Utilities Commission that changed the regulation taking away incentives to install solar.

Just how third world is the majority on the Pleasanton city council?


Posted by John B, a resident of Foothill High School,
on May 8, 2023 at 9:57 am

John B is a registered user.

Tim

These fees will constrain the development and gets financially justifiable for large houses. $2M is going to overwhelm young families if they can afford. Cities should embrace new state laws with open arms and encourage proactively to build more homes, aka infill home development. I recollect SB9 and SB10 laws passed earlier by state. Not sure how many applications are filed using these laws. Lower numbers indicate Cities are quiet innovative to make these laws futile through their code etc. This behavior should change and have more infill development.


Posted by John B, a resident of Foothill High School,
on May 8, 2023 at 9:57 am

John B is a registered user.

Tim

These fees will constrain the development and gets financially justifiable for large houses. $2M is going to overwhelm young families if they can afford. Cities should embrace new state laws with open arms and encourage proactively to build more homes, aka infill home development. I recollect SB9 and SB10 laws passed earlier by state. Not sure how many applications are filed using these laws. Lower numbers indicate Cities are quiet innovative to make these laws futile through their code etc. This behavior should change and have more infill development.


Follow this blogger.
Sign up to be notified of new posts by this blogger.

Email:

SUBMIT

Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from PleasantonWeekly.com sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

Burning just one "old style" light bulb can cost $150 or more per year
By Sherry Listgarten | 12 comments | 2,939 views

Premiere! “I Do I Don’t: How to build a better marriage” – Here, a page/weekday
By Chandrama Anderson | 2 comments | 1,354 views

Community foundations want to help local journalism survive
By Tim Hunt | 4 comments | 634 views

 

Support local families in need

Your contribution to the Pleasanton Weekly Holiday Fund will go directly to nonprofits supporting local families and children in need. Last year, Pleasanton Weekly readers contributed over $83,000 to support eight safety-net nonprofits right here in the Tri-Valley.

DONATE HERE