Campaign contribution limits wiped out in Livermore | Tim Talk | Tim Hunt | PleasantonWeekly.com |

Local Blogs

Tim Talk

By Tim Hunt

E-mail Tim Hunt

About this blog: I am a native of Alameda County, grew up in Pleasanton and currently live in the house I grew up in that is more than 100 years old. I spent 39 years in the daily newspaper business and wrote a column for more than 25 years in add...  (More)

View all posts from Tim Hunt

Campaign contribution limits wiped out in Livermore

Uploaded: Jan 25, 2018
Friends of Livermore, as a political action group, is not governed by any limits on how much money an individual or family can give to the group.
Livermore pioneered contribution limits decades ago when slow-growth (being polite) residents were concerned that developers would simply buy elections with their money fueling campaigns. So, the City Council adopted a $100 limit per person. That was increased to $250 in 2004 to account for inflation.
For the last decade, friends have started to dominate the Livermore political scene with huge expenditures for its favored candidates. Those running without the group’s support have struggled to raise enough money to be competitive.
Historically, the group has been a strong supporter of urban growth boundaries and limited housing growth. In last decade, it has focused on the downtown, trying to bring the 2,200-seat performing arts theater to Livermore until Gov. Jerry Brown killed redevelopment agencies and wiped out the financing in 2012.
It continues to push strongly for its vision for the former Luckys parking lot where the big theater would have been built.
According to Denis Cuff’s article in a recent East Bay Times, the friends spent nearly $214,000 in the last municipal election. Assistant Treasurer Jean King, one of the largest donors, told Cuff that “it’s expensive to communicate with voters.”
Consider that total beside the average of $7,500 that the was the average for the six candidates in the race. As Councilman Steve Spiedowski pointed out, it cost about $15k for a mailer in Livermore. Of course, those candidates back by the friends do not need to worry about getting their message out—the PAC will take care of it for them.
For those opposed by the friends, good luck. In the last election, incumbent council members Laureen Turner and Stewart Gary were targeted. Gary had received friends’ support when he was first elected, while Turner won mounting an independent campaign.
With friends turning against Gary, the group mounted campaign attacking Gary and Turner for their positions about downtown development and supporting challengers Bob Coomber and Bob Darling.
Rejecting Gary’s reelection is not unusual for these folks. Mayor John Marchand, who consistently has been supported by them, told paper that they’re coming after him in November.
The major donors are King and Lynn Seppala, the husband of Independent newspaper publisher Joan Seppala. They contributed $122k, more than half of the funds spent in 2014. When it comes to downtown and issues that Joan cares about, the paper is a house organ for the friends. On other issues, it provides more balanced coverage.
Surprisingly, all five council members, who of whom were backed by the friends, favored the elimination of the individual campaign limits. The ordinance was approved 3-0 this week with Mayor Marchand in Washington D.C. and Councilman Bob Coomber was excused.
Whether that will make a difference could be seen this fall if strong candidates emerge with fresh viewpoints and can raise support. The current split over downtown plans, with community leaders on both sides, could set the stage for that. Although, running money through an “independent” political action group may still be a better alternative for opponents of the friends.
The next step for the council, as it reforms elections, is to implement online reporting requirements for campaigns. Currently, anyone interested in knowing who support the friends or an individual candidate, must go to City Hall to pull the documents. That’s absurd for a city that has two national laboratories, a technology incubator and prides itself on its technology.

Comments

 +  Like this comment
Posted by james564, a resident of Canyon Oaks,
on Jan 26, 2018 at 9:15 pm

james564 is a registered user.

When you have a table, it's very secure as well as Web Link You create an extraordinary quantity of dirt while making the best job.


 +  Like this comment
Posted by denis, a resident of Amador Estates,
on Jan 27, 2018 at 2:47 am

denis is a registered user.

Do not have a few essential features with any kind of kind of timber in a snap. Web Link The Bosch POF also struggles with a few various other layout oversights


 +   1 person likes this
Posted by Matt Sullivan, a resident of Stoneridge,
on Jan 29, 2018 at 8:54 am

Matt Sullivan is a registered user.

Tim,

I find it ironic that you oppose the campaign contributions and pollical power of the Friends of Livermore, who historically have been slow-growth and resident driven, but make no mention of the overwhelming financial “investment" that the Chamber of Commerce, developers, and other businesses have made in Pleasanton over the past 10 years or so. The Chamber controls four out of five of our Councilmembers and works in collusion with City Staff to meet their goals. Costco and the new Downtown Specific Plan are just the latest example of how this works.

Someone needs to write a column on the money corruption in Pleasanton politics, but we all know the Pleasanton Weekly " a “Friend of the Chamber" " won't print it.


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Couples: Do you Really Agree or are you Afraid of not Agreeing?
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 613 views

Castlewood may consider selling Valley course for development
By Tim Hunt | 5 comments | 455 views

 

Pleasanton Readers' Choice ballot is here

It's time to decide what local business is worthy of the title "Pleasanton Readers' Choice" — and you get to decide! Cast your ballot online. Voting ends May 20th. Stay tuned for the results in the June 29th issue of the Pleasanton Weekly.

VOTE HERE