State budget continues to increase school funding | Tim Talk | Tim Hunt | PleasantonWeekly.com |

Local Blogs

Tim Talk

By Tim Hunt

E-mail Tim Hunt

About this blog: I am a native of Alameda County, grew up in Pleasanton and currently live in the house I grew up in that is more than 100 years old. I spent 39 years in the daily newspaper business and wrote a column for more than 25 years in add...  (More)

View all posts from Tim Hunt

State budget continues to increase school funding

Uploaded: May 25, 2017
Gov. Brown continues to prioritize k-12 schools and the community colleges in his revised budget.
The result for the Pleasanton school district is likely to be about $150,000 more revenue in the next fiscal year than anticipated in January when the governor released his first budget. The total budget proposes spending $180 billion, while the state’s General Fund is anticipated to receive $115,600 billion in revenue. That’s slightly more than the January proposal, despite April tax revenues being below budget targets.
Funding for k-12 schools and community colleges has increased 58 percent since the low point in 2011-12.
In contrast to the schools, the governor put a hammer on the table with the University of California system, planning to withhold $50 million until the system complies with recommendations from the State Auditor’s office, which issued a report ripping the UC Office of the President.
The governor continues to caution about how long the current eight-year expansion can continue. It’s already run far longer than the typical post-recession expansion, but has been anemic at 2 percent growth or less in much of the country and in the interior counties of California. It has been robust in the Bay Area.
The Legislature now will work with the governor’s office to pass a final budget by June 15 to avoid having its pay checks docked.
Once the budget is passed, then the Legislature can turn its attention to the pending bills.
Among them is the truly incredible (or insane) state-run single-payer universal health care plan for all residents—legal and illegal. It’s mind bogglingly expensive.
Democrat Sen. Richard Lara’s plan to cover everyone would cost $400 billion—in other words, more than double next year’s expenditures of $180 billion.
To pay for it, he proposes a 15 percent payroll tax on top of the more than 6 percent that employers already pay on their gross payroll. Talk about a job killer and an invitation to leave the state.
Vermont tried a single-player plan and could not make it work in a tiny state with a relatively homogeneous population.
Here in California, with more than 38,700 million residents, it’s far more complex.
And tell me, just what state program is operated efficiently? Remember, it’s operated by bureaucrats and politicians that are too often captive to special interests such as public employee unions. The state’s retirement system is a train wreck financially. Managers have reduced the anticipated rate of return, which requires cities and counties to increase their contributions. Those steadily increasing costs likely will require reductions in services to maintain balanced budgets.
The shortfall is almost 40 percent and was magnified when benefits were increased in the early 2000s and, because it appeared well-funded, cities started picking up the employees’ share of the contributions. Short term thinking with long term money.
Likely more of the same with the ill-advised single-payer plan.

Comments

 +   3 people like this
Posted by local, a resident of Vintage Hills,
on May 25, 2017 at 6:09 pm

Before the state takes on a new program like universal healthcare, it needs to get the current obligations under control. Specifically state pensions. The pensions are going to kill all school districts and many cities.

For those who do not think a 15% additional payroll tax will affect them since they do not own a business, think again. That is a HUGE increase in costs for a business that will cause them to either significantly raise prices, cut jobs, or completely leave the state.

To demonstrate how much the bureaucrats mis-manage our tax dollars, look at Brown's proposal to borrow money (where we have to pay interest) and invest it in order to pay down the retirement debt. Doubling down! To recap, CalPERS does not make its investment objectives so we are not sufficiently funded. Brown suggests we take out a loan and invest it to make up for the investment deficiencies we have already seen. No different than a gambler spending all their money and taking out a loan so they can gamble more and get their money back.


 +  Like this comment
Posted by Ramon, a resident of Avila,
on May 26, 2017 at 4:24 am

Cinemabox HD s the one app I would refer to even my parents. The app is simple to use, is comfortable to navigate thogh and is also very efficient at what it does. What it does is very well known.
Not so well known is the fact that the app is free and secure. To know more about the application check out this website Web Link


 +  Like this comment
Posted by Ritel, a resident of California Somerset,
on May 26, 2017 at 4:31 am

hi there,
in my opinions school funding is important but the state should also check that the money they are investing in this should also be used properly and there should not be any misuse of that of any kind
Web Link


 +  Like this comment
Posted by Michael Austin, a resident of Pleasanton Meadows,
on May 29, 2017 at 5:38 pm

Michael Austin is a registered user.

The last couple of elections voters approved Billions of dollars in bonds for community colleges and school districts.

Given that influx of cash for these schools, what necessitates Governor brown funding more money for them?


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Swalwell reaches way too far
By pleasantonweekly.com | 32 comments | 862 views

Livermore veteran, 96, has reason to be proud
By Jeb Bing | 2 comments | 692 views