Pleasanton council wisely reverses course | Tim Talk | Tim Hunt | |

Local Blogs

Tim Talk

By Tim Hunt

E-mail Tim Hunt

About this blog: I am a native of Alameda County, grew up in Pleasanton and currently live in the house I grew up in that is more than 100 years old. I spent 39 years in the daily newspaper business and wrote a column for more than 25 years in add...  (More)

View all posts from Tim Hunt

Pleasanton council wisely reverses course

Uploaded: Jun 9, 2015
Good call, upon further review, by the Pleasanton City Council last week.
The council, when apprised that the advisory election on planning for the eastside could cost the city more than $500,000, decided to abandon that notion. If they really want to know how the public feels about the eastside planning, they can get an accurate poll for about 1 percent of that cost.
More importantly, given the uncertain statewide water situation, taking a breather is sound policy.
Stopping the process entirely is not. The landowners have invested more than $1 million to date. A plan is just that---a plan. Entitlements, if any, can come later when we have our collective arms around the water situation and can update traffic and schools.
Student population is an interesting challenge. During the planning for both the Dougherty Valley in San Ramon and east Dublin, staff and officials used the best projections possible and both flat out missed on school population in those new areas. Pleasanton had a similar challenge a few years back when young families moved into existing homes as long-time residents moved on. That created a population bubble.
To cope with the overflow of students, the city of Dublin already took the unprecedented step of giving the school district an additional parcel of land for a new school on the eastside, while the one remaining homebuilder in the Dougherty Valley, then Shapell Homes, donated a parcel to the San Ramon school district for a new school. Since then, Toll Brothers bought Shapell.
Both districts, in their projections, estimated students based upon their history and the best data available. It turns out that families are larger or multiple families are living in the same house, thus the demand for more schools.

It is a time of transition for Barbara Saba, the founding executive director of the Valley Pregnancy Center.
Barbara left a secure corporate job to answer God's call to serve women with unexpected pregnancies. That was in 1988 when the fledgling non-profit had an 800-square-foot office and $500 in the bank.
When she retires on Oct. 1, she leaves an organization is excellent condition and one that is expanding its services to women and the fathers of their babies. The center now is housed in a modern office building at Stoneridge Mall and has 6,800 square feet. It turned a big corner when it became a fully licensed medical facility in 2004.
At Barbara's recommendation, the board has selected Dr. Frank Burger, a former seven-year board member, as her successor. He will join the team on July 1 as president and work alongside CEO Barbara until she retires in October.

Another notable and planned retirement will take place this month when Shelby McNamara leaves as the CEO of the Danville Area Chamber of Commerce.
Stepping into that role is Shelley Despotakis, currently director of membership and communication for the Livermore Chamber of Commerce. Shelley is the daughter of late Pleasanton Mayor Ken Mercer. She brings a mix of private sector and non-profit sector experience to her new role. Previously, she was the manager of ValleyCare Health System's charitable foundation—a role her dad also held along with other responsibilities.
Shelby served four years in her current tenure, which is her second go-around in Danville. She held the same position from 2000-2003 and also was president of the Pleasanton Chamber of Commerce.
She will join her husband, Vince, founder and former owner of the popular Dublin steakhouse of the same name, full-time in their mountain home.

What is it worth to you?


Posted by Michael Austin, a resident of Pleasanton Meadows,
on Jun 9, 2015 at 11:01 am

Michael Austin is a registered user.

The planning commission would provide a real service if they would break out of their box and require the following for all future developments, no matter the amount of money already invested.

1. For every acre of land developed the developer be required to bring one acre foot of water to the project.

2. Require the developer to build schools and related infrastructure on the project.

Developers can negotiate water rights from any number of sources generally $2K - $5K per acre foot.

Schools built on the project can be suitable for what the project generates numbers children, plus 20%.

Posted by Bill, a resident of Amberwood/Wood Meadows,
on Jun 9, 2015 at 1:32 pm

Projected enrollment for Dublin High School in 2019-2020, is 3,333 students!
See Web Link
How is this good news for anyone except the football boosters club? Wow, more than 800 students per class.

Posted by Time for the big dogs to go, a resident of Canyon Meadows,
on Jun 9, 2015 at 6:44 pm

What is very clear is that the top administrators must go. Parvin has moved on. At least she understood she must apply elsewhere. The assistant superintendent of Humane Resources is "retiring" at a very young age.... meaning he understood staying is no option. Now the Deputy Superintendent and the other Assistant Superintendent must leave if this community is to being to have faith and trust in its school district. Even the board must understand this to be true.

Posted by oldtimer, a resident of Vineyard Hills,
on Jun 12, 2015 at 6:09 pm

@Michael, building a school does not solve the problem of running the school. There is administration overhead. When the plans were first here for the Neal Elementary School, the unions and district fought to start the school because the administration cost. This was before the district then decided to proceed and screwed everything up with Signature Properties (both sides at fault).

On the water issue, do you feel that anybody remodeling their home and increasing the size should be held to the same requirement? Or do you want this for just new housing? Is this for any new housing? Should this apply only to developments larger than a certain number of units? There is infill housing left in the city and the cost for water and schools would be prohibitive.

Lets be honest, most people in the city do not want the east side housing as planned but they fill powerless against the developers. The water issue was an 'easy' way to try and stop that development.

Follow this blogger.
Sign up to be notified of new posts by this blogger.



Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

Burning just one "old style" light bulb can cost $150 or more per year
By Sherry Listgarten | 10 comments | 2,435 views

Reflecting on lives this Thanksgiving Day
By Tim Hunt | 0 comments | 1,143 views

Premiere! “I Do I Don’t: How to build a better marriage” – Here, a page/weekday
By Chandrama Anderson | 2 comments | 901 views


Support local families in need

Your contribution to the Pleasanton Weekly Holiday Fund will go directly to nonprofits supporting local families and children in need. Last year, Pleasanton Weekly readers contributed over $83,000 to support eight safety-net nonprofits right here in the Tri-Valley.