Trash board reaching for your wallet | Tim Talk | Tim Hunt | |

Local Blogs

Tim Talk

By Tim Hunt

E-mail Tim Hunt

About this blog: I am a native of Alameda County, grew up in Pleasanton and currently live in the house I grew up in that is more than 100 years old. I spent 39 years in the daily newspaper business and wrote a column for more than 25 years in add...  (More)

View all posts from Tim Hunt

Trash board reaching for your wallet

Uploaded: Feb 11, 2014
In case you haven't noticed, the StopWaste bureaucrats in Alameda County are working at picking your pocket again as they strive to stay in business.
The agency's simple mission is to reduce the amount of trash going into the Altamont and Vasco landfills and it has done that very well. The directors are elected officials from throughout the county. It had a steady source of revenue—a per ton tipping fee that was assessed countywide plus a fee on San Francisco trash dumped at Altamont.
The challenge for the agency's bureaucrats is that it has been successful and the amount of trash going into the dumps has been reduced significantly. The San Francisco fee is expected to stop in two years and the agency has been planning how to cope with that for the past few years.
The agency runs on a $22 million budget, although the portion that directors can control is about $10.9 million. The agency actually reduced its year-over-year expenses by $513,000 in the current year.
It also established its so-called "benchmark" fee that charges all users so StopWaste employees can selectively sample business and home customers of the various garbage companies and then show how people are doing against the countywide averages. You probably received the spiffy document in your mail recently—it was entitled "How we can add $140 million to Alameda County's economy."
That the amount of economic activity the agency officials believe will be generated from jobs if we recycle more. The cost is fairly minor-- $1.81 for a single can and $7.24 for more than one can, but the total revenue to the agency is estimated at $875,000 annually. You can opt out—you will miss the report—by going online to
The latest revenue raising exercise borrows a page from the East Bay Regional Park District playbook. A few years back, the district established a two-county assessment district for parks maintenance. The annual fee, again, was modest at $5.44, but that number adds up to a lot of cash over all of the properties in Alameda and Contra Costa counties.
StopWaste sent letters out in January to all residential property owners informing them that the county waste authority (one of the two government bodies that comprise StopWaste) was going to institute a fee of $9.95 annually per unit for 10 years to operate its hazardous waste collection service. In its cash-flush days, the agency built its state-of-the-art collection centers such as the one in east Livermore off Vasco Road.
If you collect your unused paint, solvents, pesticides and pay attention to the calendar, it's a fairly efficient process to drop them off. The big challenge is that the center in Livermore is only open six days a month (Thursday through Saturday, twice monthly).
The authority originally planned to adopt the fee unless there were too many objections at its Feb. 26 meeting, but it now has postponed the potential adoption to March 26. Homeowners can object by filling out the form that was mailed to your home or going to the website to download a form. You will need to know your parcel number. If enough people (10 percent) object, it will be subject to a vote by the affected landowners—otherwise the board can adopt the fee.
The proposed fee will raise $5 million annually—a big chunk of the overall budget. Currently the program is funded by a $2.15 per ton charge.
For most government agencies and the bureaucrats they employ strive—as well as many other institutions—the No. 1 goal is to stay in business. For StopWaste, the reduction in tonnage at the dumps is a great victory. Instead of declaring it and going home, the mission is creeps or goals are revised upward so the agency stays around.
For residents countywide, four sites are better than one, but the question the bureaucrats should be asking is whether there is a cheaper and more convenient solution. How about contracting with the transfer stations—that operate seven days a week—to become drop-off centers. Instead of simply adding yet another fee for no improvement in service, the agency should ask the more fundamental question—how can we serve the residents more efficiently?
The local reps are council members Jerry Pentin (Pleasanton), Don Biddle (Dublin) and Laureen Turner (Livermore).
What is it worth to you?


Posted by Michael Austin, a resident of Pleasanton Meadows,
on Feb 11, 2014 at 4:53 pm

In Alameda County there are approximately 132,000,000 housing units with 16,000,000 unoccupied. 42,000,000 million of the housing units are apartments, mobile homes, boats, RV's, van, etc. With less then 3,000,000
unoccupied. The population of Alameda County is approximately 1,556,000.
Property owners make up approximately 950,000 of the population that are being asked to pay up. That leaves approximately 607,000 of the population that is not being asked to pay up. A point of sale fee is the only route by which this waste expense should be collected. It should not be shouldered alone by the property owners.

Posted by mooseturd, a resident of Pleasanton Valley,
on Feb 13, 2014 at 9:25 am

mooseturd is a registered user.

Something doesn't make sense with your numbers. You claim Alameda County has almost 10 housing units per capita. Not hardly.

Having said this, I agree that a point of sale fee is the only fair means to collect this tax

Follow this blogger.
Sign up to be notified of new posts by this blogger.



Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

Burning just one "old style" light bulb can cost $150 or more per year
By Sherry Listgarten | 10 comments | 2,440 views

Reflecting on lives this Thanksgiving Day
By Tim Hunt | 0 comments | 1,144 views

Premiere! “I Do I Don’t: How to build a better marriage” – Here, a page/weekday
By Chandrama Anderson | 2 comments | 902 views


Support local families in need

Your contribution to the Pleasanton Weekly Holiday Fund will go directly to nonprofits supporting local families and children in need. Last year, Pleasanton Weekly readers contributed over $83,000 to support eight safety-net nonprofits right here in the Tri-Valley.