Sign up for Express
Express is a daily e-edition, distributed by e-mail every weekday.
Sign up to receive Express!


PleasantonWeekly.com Town Square Google
Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Pleasanton, California Forecast

Increase font Increase font
Decrease font Decrease font
Adjust text size
New library, civic center for downtown?

New complex could cost $70 million


Share
It could take years before sufficient funds are available and construction actually starts but the City Council has taken a major step towards building a $70-million new Civic Center complex and public library. Councilmembers indicated that the library would be the first to be rebuilt.

At a joint city council-library commission meeting, a majority of councilmembers said they favored a recommendation by the library commission to move the library from its current location at 400 Old Bernal Ave. to a new 73,000-square-foot public library building that would be built on city-owned property at the south end of Main Street. That would more than double the floor space of today's 21-year-old library, which has 30,178 square feet of space.

"I like the idea of making the library part of the grand entrance to our downtown," Mayor Jennifer Hosterman said. "It would be an opportunity to grab a book and walk downtown for coffee at Tully's or Cafe Main. I also like the idea of taking this opportunity to build a civic center that is more compact and allows us to have an organization under one roof."

As part of the project, most of the civic center facilities, including temporary buildings, would be torn down with a new 56,000-square-foot complex to be built at the north end of the existing library building for use by city administrative offices that are now located in buildings at 400 Old Bernal Ave. and at 123 and 157 Main St. The existing library building also would be converted into office and meeting room spaces for the city government and other public uses.

The plan also calls for constructing parking garages for 171 vehicles for library patrons and another 523 vehicles adjacent to the new civic center.

The police headquarters building on Bernal Avenue would not be affected in the study's recommendation, although several council members have said they would like to see a more architecturally-pleasing facility built eventually, possibly on city-owned land in the Bernal Community Park. The police building was renovated and a 20,000-square-foot addition was built 10 years ago.

The council's action, based on an a poll of councilmembers during an informal workshop meeting with members of the library commission, came after a report on three studies that now have been completed on the potential redevelopment of the Civic Center and library buildings on Old Bernal Avenue, Main Street and Bernal Avenue. Although no construction funds have been appropriated, the council did agree to spend $45,000 to refine the study by the consulting firm of Field Paoli that is recommending that Pleasanton proceed with the project.

Also included in the council's action was authorization for City Manager Nelson Fialho and others to re-start negotiations with the city and county of San Francisco to acquire a vacant 3.3-acre site between Old Bernal Avenue and the Union Pacific railroad tracks that at one time Pleasanton thought it could buy for $500,000. San Francisco now is asking $3.5 million for the property.

Pleasanton officials thought they had a "deal" on the land with San Francisco's then Mayor Willie Brown as part of an acquisition agreement between Greenbriar Homes and its partners with the city and county of San Francisco for the 510-acre Bernal property that it had owned since the 1930s. As part of the $126-million purchase agreement, Greenbriar donated 318 acres on Bernal to the city of Pleasanton in exchange for being allowed to build 510 homes and apartments on the rest of the property. At the time, South Bay Development Company also acquired 39 acres along the I-680 border of the property and Pleasanton was to pay $500,000 for the extra 3.3-acre site. Somehow, the 3.3-acre purchase agreement was never include in the final contract.

Expanding the library and rebuilding at least part of the civic center site has long been a priority of the City Council although never at the top of the list. Now that other capital improvement projects have been completed and with the last of the current list -- the $10-million Firehouse Arts Center -- nearing completion, the council is expected to move these two new projects to the top when it considers priorities in early 2010.

The problem will be that the council, at the recommendation of Fialho and Finance Director Dave Culver, has halted all new capital projects for the duration of the economic downturn. No one is predicting when city revenues will start growing again.

Also, the full development of the Bernal Community Park, another project that could also cost $70 million or more and was approved by voters two years ago, would be completed before the library and civic center projects unless the council shifts its pending priorities.

The council considered building a new City Hall and expanding the library in 2001 as part of a Downtown Specific Plan developed that year, but the two projects have never been top priorities. Since then, funding has gone toward building Callippe Preserve Golf Course, the Alviso Adobe Community Park, restoring the Veterans Memorial Building and Kottinger Creek, and now building the Firehouse Arts Center.

The decision to again move forward on both the civic center and library expansion projects follows a new study by Kathryn Page Associates, a library planning firm, that the public library is woefully short of space in serving Pleasanton, where the population has grown from 44,600 when the library was opened to nearly 70,000 today, more than a 50 percent increase.

Originally a branch of the Alameda County Library, the city took over operation of the library in 1999, increased financial support and raised library service levels at a time when Alameda County was cutting back on hours of operation and inventory.

"In fact, the library built by the county was significantly cut in size late in the process and was under-built at the time," said Julie Farnsworth, library director.

The study found that the library that has served the community since it was built in 1988 has stayed the same since it became a city-owned and operated public library. Before 1988, the public library was located where the Gingerbread School is now operating in Amador Community Park, and was in a trailer before that.

Circulation of materials at the library has increased 78 percent, topping 1.4 million items last year. Shelving capacity at the library has now been reached at 2.7 million volumes, with a 62 percent net increase in the overall collection size needed to meet the projected needs for Pleasanton in 2030.

Programming for children, families and adults also is lagging. Since 1999, annual attendance at library programs has grown from 5,393 to more than 30,000 people. The library's reader seat capacity is now 140 whereas a total of 364 is recommended by the consultants.

"This is the time to build the new library," said Library Commissioner Valerie Arkin. "Federal stimulus dollars might become available for projects like this and these need to be shovel-ready projects. That's why I would like to see city staff directed to get this project shovel-ready now."

"Our downtown is experiencing challenging times right now and this could help," she added. "Making a new library a reality is the right thing to do."


Comments

Posted by Stephen, a resident of another community, on Oct 22, 2009 at 3:45 pm

Editor: 2.7 million volumes currently in the Pleasanton Library? In 30,000 sq feet? Is that a misprint?

I totally agree that a new building with more space for seating, programs, and public use computers would be a good thing, and hope the money becomes available sooner rather than later. Any possibility of major donors stepping forward? And as terrific as it would be to have an architecturally beautiful new library building, is there any vacant space in an equally accessible location that could be leased or purchased and remodeled to house the Library and/or other city offices for less than 70 million?


Posted by Henry, a resident of the Amberwood/Wood Meadows neighborhood, on Oct 22, 2009 at 5:13 pm

Judging from other projects done by the city, this will be gold plated and take twice as long as it should (witness the new sports park, Val Vista fields, Kottinger Creek ($1 MM for this!!! Wow!). Perhaps the library needs could be satisfied short term by leasing and remodeling one of the many vacant office buildings around the city - it would save $$, but we would have to get over having it be Pleasanton 'special' - i.e. customized to our exact liking, and with a price tag that goes with a custom building. Unti

The existing approved capital projects (Bernal Fields esp) should be completed in full before this starts.


Posted by Jerry, a resident of the Oak Hill neighborhood, on Oct 22, 2009 at 11:54 pm

Any "high rollers" out there that would like to see their name on a library? Step forward with the cash...:)


Posted by Resident, a resident of the Vintage Hills Elementary School neighborhood, on Oct 23, 2009 at 12:22 pm

We do not need a new library in this day of technology. If we really need more space....put a second story on the current building. It is a beautiful building in a very convenient location. The Pleasanton library is currently being used as a meeting place for teens. If you utilized one of the empty buildings around town for teens to study and socialize in....the library could be better utilized for library patrons. We come up with some crazy ideas in order to spend government money. Why not focus on bringing businesses to all the empty commercial buildings in town and leave what is working alone.


Posted by Very Concerned, a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on Oct 23, 2009 at 12:42 pm

Stop the madness! Another branch library perhaps, in an existing empty building in town (there are many to choose from).

We need to get away from WANTS and live within our means. Families must do it, cities, counties, states and this nation must do it.

And there is no money for a shiny new city hall. Get over it.


Posted by Sally, a resident of the Happy Valley neighborhood, on Oct 23, 2009 at 9:05 pm

Our library is small and outdated for our community and the usage it's getting currently. Have you seen the libraries in Dublin and Livermore lately, not to mention other surrounding Bay Area community libraries? They are where we should be headed in our planning and priorities for Pleasanton and it's new library. The entire community uses and thrives in a library. Let's build it and "they will come"!


Posted by Cholo, a resident of Livermore, on Oct 24, 2009 at 4:48 pm

Build a large shed and fill it with up to date computers and THEY WILL COME!

Library...over!!!


Posted by Michelle, a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on Dec 12, 2009 at 12:51 pm

Compared to the Dublin and Livermore libraries,the Pleasanton library is certainly outdated but lets be honest, ours is still just as sufficent. Simplicity.


Posted by Michelle, a resident of the Another Pleasanton neighborhood neighborhood, on Dec 12, 2009 at 12:53 pm

sufficient**


Add a Comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration! Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff
 
We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *
Select your Neighborhood or School Community: *
Comment: *
210 page views
 

Pleasanton Weekly ©2010 Embarcadero Media.
All rights reserved.