Pleasanton arsonist faces three years in prison
Original post made on Mar 12, 2012
Read the full story here Web Link posted Monday, March 12, 2012, 4:10 PM
on Mar 12, 2012 at 9:12 pm
Great work PPD!......again.
on Mar 12, 2012 at 9:57 pm
So, after reading this article several times, I'm still wondering why the grand jury would uphold the original charges of arson and possession of flammable materials, yet drop the charge of intent to set a fire...? Or is that part of the article just poorly written and vague?
on Mar 13, 2012 at 11:30 am
Huh, it looks like the grand jury only dropped the forgery charge, not the charge of intent to set a fire.