Another Alameda County Superior Court Frank Roesch Decision overturned
Original post made by First Amendment on May 30, 2012
Wonder what would have happened had three city council members actually appealed the Frank Roesch Urban Habitat decision?
Court dismisses Oakland bank's libel suit over Craigslist rant
Bay City News Service
Posted: 05/30/2012 09:27:41 PM PDT
Updated: 05/30/2012 09:27:42 PM PDT
SAN FRANCISCO -- A state appeals court on Wednesday dismissed an Oakland bank's libel lawsuit against a former executive who posted derogatory comments about the bank online in the "Rants and Raves" section of Craigslist
The bank sued him for defamation in Alameda County Superior Court, claiming the comments were false and libelous. Rogers contended in pretrial proceedings that his posts were protected free speech.
In today's decision, a three-judge panel of the Court of Appeal in San Francisco ordered dismissal of the case and overturned a 2010 ruling in which Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch declined to toss out the lawsuit.
on Jun 15, 2012 at 4:20 pm
Stacey is a registered user.
Compares with the brilliance of the Oak Grove judge who dismissed the Lin lawsuit against the City for the poison pill language: Web Link
"The panel said it had decided to act despite being "ordinarily reluctant to interfere with a decision of this type.""