Downtown Pleasanton needs our help
Original post made by Jeb Bing on Jan 14, 2011
What surprised me, too, is that as I visited the shops and a few restaurants over the holidays, I ran into a number of Pleasanton friends. But this happened when I was at Hacienda Crossings in Dublin, at the Livery in Danville, in downtown Walnut Creek and even at Nordstrom and Macy's in San Francisco. These folks that I talked to said they go to downtown Pleasanton for First Wednesday street parties, Concerts in the Park and a few other times, but they don't think of our downtown as having a sufficient mix of retail business that they find in these other locations.
Some of you may remember Craig Scharton, who was the executive director of the Pleasanton Downtown Association in the mid to late 1990s and was responsible for starting the First Wednesday parties in 1998. Downtown was facing tough times then and Scharton pressed for changes. He suggested that property owners fill their first floor building spaces with retail stores that would appeal to a wide variety of shoppers, even chain stores such as Crate & Barrel, Restoration Hardware, Ann Taylor Jr. or other regional and national chains that would add to the mix of smaller businesses on Main Street. Burlingame has done this in its downtown where the sidewalks are crowded on many Saturdays and Sundays.
Banks, real estate offices, dentists and law offices are often the preferred tenants for property owners because they pay their rent on time and generally stay put. But in terms of appealing to shoppers, they don't. These are businesses, too, that seldom open on Saturdays or nights and never on Sundays.
Ann Taylor or an Abercrombie, on the other hand, have special appeal to the under-30 set, especially teenagers, which Pleasanton's downtown desperately needs. These are corporate-owned stores that also have deep pockets for advertising. Scharton says promotions by just one of these larger retailers can support at least a dozen nearby stores that don't have large or sufficient marketing budgets.
Scharton believes Pleasanton should consider again a first-floor retail-only ordinance that would require property owners through incentives to rent their ground floor spaces to retail businesses. That was tried in early 2000 when community meetings were held on a Downtown Specific Plan, which was adopted by the City Council in 2002 but without the controversial First Floor Retail only provision. Property owners don't like being told how they can use their properties.
This same issue is now being debated by city planners as rezoning plans proceed for an 800-unit, high density affordable housing development near the Bart station in Hacienda Business Park. Some on the City Council and Planning Commission are insisting that ground floor -- particularly corner ground floor spaces -- be reserved for retailers. The developers, who have experience at building this type of housing, argue that there's already too much vacant retail space in the area and these corner units will sit empty, possibly for years, and become neighborhood eyesores.
That's the problem with imposing a similar regulation downtown, where an empty Domus and a vacant lot across Main Street where the old Union Jack tavern used to stand are causing would-be shoppers to pause before parking their cars and heading to the shops. Property owners need tenants and if there aren't any retailers able to afford or wanting the space, another bank, real estate office or title company suits them fine.
Merchants here are seeing a steady decrease in day-trippers to downtown. Residents seem to be the only ones supporting businesses here and even that isn't saying much. Shoppers used to fill Main Street between noon and 3 p.m., during and right after lunch. The peak now is 3 p.m. to 6 p.m. Downtown also is becoming less of a retail environment. Take a close look at the PDA website and you'll see that there are 80 personal care places in the downtown and only 25 retail stores. Businesses that have been here for more than 10 years seem to be weathering this well, but newer businesses aren't, as we saw with Stork's Nest, Thriving Ink and Doodlebug before that.
7zHraity of Pleasanton, its economic development arm and the PDA are working with merchants to boost business. A Danville consulting firm's promotion didn't work; a committee to add more nighttime entertainment in the downtown area to make Pleasanton more of a night-life destination has merit, but lacks the week-day, weekend, daytime attraction merchants need. The 2002 Downtown Specific Plan suggested promotions that still sound good: more mini-plazas attractively designed for small public gatherings, similar but larger than Tully's plaza, more places to grab a sandwich after events at the Firehouse Arts Center and more parking. A better mix and more retailing would help reinvigorate downtown Pleasanton to make it a regional destination for shoppers.
on Jan 14, 2011 at 11:18 pm
I find the idea of 800 high-density, low-income sudsidized units added in Hacienda, a truly terrifying concept ! Stop, overturn, that is the most twisted thing I've heard lately....talk about destroying Pleasanton. Anything that stupid, certainly couldn't have come from anybody who cares about Pleasanton. Don't tell me there are hypocrites among us !
on Jan 15, 2011 at 11:10 am
I remember talking to the Hospice group before they vacated. The landlord had raised their rent to $20,000 a month. So, it seems the problem are the landlords who gouge their renters. S/he rents to other gougers (banks) and everyone is making money ... oh, except for the ambiance of Main Street.
One other note. I just ate lunch at a Main Street restaurant. $80 for wine and appetizers. I don't know if that's a rent thing, but it's not something I can support regularly.
on Jan 15, 2011 at 5:57 pm
"I remember talking to the Hospice group before they vacated. The landlord had raised their rent to $20,000 a month."
WHAT are you smoking?!? I knew the now deceased landlord and the manager of Hospice. The rent was $4,000 per month for 2,000 sq feet, which was half what he could have gotten and one third or less of what other landlords were charging.
Yes, there are some very greedy landlords in town, just look at where the vacancies are. But don't throw around ridiculous numbers when you have no clue about the actual truth.