In granting the injunction the judge agreed with the claim that plaintiff (Lin et all) would be harmed by City Council action while the city and Ayala et al would not suffer harm by waiting for the February 22 hearing. If that hearing is favorable to the defendents, then they can still proceed to put the referendum petition on the ballot.
Furthermore, in granting the injunction the judge agrees that plaintiffs have a reasonable chance at prevailing.
This story contains 121 words.
If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.
If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.