If this is a PAID position, however, then I have a big problem with it. Poetry is NOT the function of government at ANY level.
If her poetry is good, then she should be rewarded through the free market (or public school system I suppose). Through the free market she could publish and sell her poetry if she hasn't already. If her poetry is good, then it should be in demand and she'll be rewarded by those who prefer to "consume" it.
I am not familiar with her poetry and am not making any judgment on its quality. I am sure it is wonderful. However, everyone has different "tastes" and they range all across the board...including NO taste in poetry. Just like preferences in different foods...I don't favor being FORCED to pay for items for which I prefer not to consume.
So, back to my original question, is this a paid position? If so, how much are the Pleasanton taxpayers paying from their hard earned income...especially these days of cost-containment?
This story contains 205 words.
If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.
If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.