If the Poet Laureate is a Paid Position, How Much Are Taxpayers Paying?
Original post made by Frances on Jun 17, 2009
If this is a PAID position, however, then I have a big problem with it. Poetry is NOT the function of government at ANY level.
If her poetry is good, then she should be rewarded through the free market (or public school system I suppose). Through the free market she could publish and sell her poetry if she hasn't already. If her poetry is good, then it should be in demand and she'll be rewarded by those who prefer to "consume" it.
I am not familiar with her poetry and am not making any judgment on its quality. I am sure it is wonderful. However, everyone has different "tastes" and they range all across the board...including NO taste in poetry. Just like preferences in different foods...I don't favor being FORCED to pay for items for which I prefer not to consume.
So, back to my original question, is this a paid position? If so, how much are the Pleasanton taxpayers paying from their hard earned income...especially these days of cost-containment?
on Jun 17, 2009 at 1:29 pm
Good God the people who post on this site need to get a life!
on Jun 17, 2009 at 1:59 pm
If their is pay it should be a part of the public record. I support the city for supporting the arts but would be curious to know what the pay is for writing poetry here in P Town.
on Jun 17, 2009 at 2:25 pm
Emily West is a registered user.
The position is not paid. This is from the city council packet from last night:
The City Poet Laureate receives no remuneration. Any expenses related to the Poet Laureate program, i.e. supplies for workshops, poetry readings, etc., are allocated within the Parks and Community Services Department's operating budget, and total approximately $2,000.