http://pleasantonweekly.com/square/print/index.php?i=3&d=&t=1342


Town Square

General Plan delayed again by housing cap dispute

Original post made on Feb 12, 2009

Community and city leaders started updating the Pleasanton General Plan in 2003, a hoped-for three year process that is just now nearing completion and waiting for final approval by the Planning Commission and City Council within the next few weeks.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, February 12, 2009, 7:51 AM

Comments

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Angela
a resident of Downtown
on Feb 12, 2009 at 9:21 am

If you watched the School Board meeting the other night you learned that 25 to 35% of our housing units are part of multi-unit (read Apartment) complexes. (Sidebar – If I was campaigning for a new tax, I would know exactly how many people I was proposing to impose it on, as well as how many student beneficiaries lived in non-single family home units since this will clearly become an issue and common knowledge during the campaigning process. My guess is that they actually do know this, but haven't wanted to say in a public forum because the information would further erode any perception of support they may have generated.) I initially thought this was not possible, but then took the time to do some exploring and discovered that there is a substantial amount of rental inventory tucked into pockets throughout the city. If you have any doubt about this, spend a few moments driving into each complex on Vineyard between First Street and Bernal. I think we have more than filled our obligation (if we in fact have one) to supply affordable housing.

Various lobbies and liberal politicians have been trying to turn Piedmont into West Oakland, Pleasanton into Stockton, Walnut Creek into Pittsburgh, etc for years. At some point we need to decide if we want to become a Socialist nation or continue to allow people to work for the things they want. And that includes living in a nice area.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Wrong Generation
a resident of Highland Oaks
on Feb 12, 2009 at 2:36 pm

Jeb,

"Pat" Brown was Jerry's governor dad. Kinda like the Bush's, except democrats.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Stacey
a resident of Amberwood/Wood Meadows
on Feb 12, 2009 at 2:45 pm

Angela,

The Board should take a look at structuring a parcel tax based upon square footage instead of a flat rate per parcel. Multi-family units like apartments would be taxed more fairly and the extra cost would be passed on in rent to renters. Dr. Casey stated at one of the community forums that such a tax is perceived as "more fair" and tends to generate more in revenue than the flat tax. If the Board really wants a parcel tax to pass, they'd look at ways of making it "more fair".


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Jeb Bing
editor of the Pleasanton Weekly
on Feb 13, 2009 at 8:43 am

Jeb Bing is a registered user.

To Wrong Generation: Ooops. I had the dad in mind as I was reviewing "Jerry" Brown's letter. You're right. "Pat" Brown was quite a different kind of governor like, as you said, the difference between father and son Bush. Thanks for the heads-up.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Tom
a resident of Pleasanton Heights
on Feb 13, 2009 at 9:50 am

To those who are older Californians can remember Governor "Moonbeam" Jerry Brown. He is the same moron at 72 as he was in his 30's.
His action is purely polical because he wants to run for Governor again. Wake up people. Stop the liberals dictating our future in Pleasanton.