The other day in the Bay Area News Group reported on the Lancaster Vs City of pleasanton case. City Attourney Jonathan Lowell was quated as saying the claims against Martens lacked any merrit. I wonder why his charges were dropped? The actions of the Pleasanton Police in this matter are criminal. I woukd sugest that officer martens testimony in the future is worth nothing as he claimed to have found drugs on Lancaster then the DA drops charges due to lack of evidence? So quite clear the martens acusations lacked merrit I don't think so Mr. Lowell. The more you try and sweep it under the rug the more foolish you look. The attourney genrals office or the FBI should investigate the matter maybe they will.
THe people of pleasanton need to know wjho is policing theier streets. They also need to know the integrity concerns about City Attourney Jonathan Lowell. Tip of the iceburg and I bet when its oveer people wish they had done the right thing instead of continuing the compromising actions taken in covering up coruption.
Trey Secord had given officer Martens information he knew to be false. Martens Lied on a police report stating he had dispatch run lancasters records and found out he had a search clause then searched. Reality is he had run lancaster records two days before even corrected lancasters Birthdate to Trey Secord. Why lie about that Tim Martens wrote a knowingly false police report thats a crime poszxsiably a felony. I wouldn't pat yourself on the back just yet Mr. Lowell, Mr. Martens, and Mr. slouhurber. Its the tip of the iceburg. wait until a outside agency looks at the mess of amended reports and false statements. I believe your outlook will be slightly different.