Rallies planned today at UC Berkeley, other campuses to protest budget cuts
Original post made on Sep 25, 2009
Read the full story here Web Link posted Thursday, September 24, 2009, 6:38 AM
on Sep 25, 2009 at 2:59 am
The issue of cutbacks is no longer new to us; there had been a lot of group of companies that made use of this as recession falter. Insufficiency of fund lead to a cost cutting thus, some of the government project had been paralyzed. At some point in time school need to cost cut but should not affect the quality education. It is worth to have an easy to loan to impart to them how significant excellent education is. I have nothing against cost cut provided it won't affect the education. In spite of so much economic trouble education shouldn't be put at stake.
For more info visit: Web Link
on Sep 25, 2009 at 9:42 am
The furlough programs are said to save jobs, and they probably do, but it does not improve the quality of life so-to-speak for anyone but the bean counters. I can say from experience that furloughs only impose additional work for less pay on the people forced to participate in such programs. For example, one person I know well works at a company that has mandatory time off each month. The employees salary is reduced accordingly. Yet they still have the same amount of work in that their normal 40-50 hours of work in crammed into a shorter work week. The upshot is that on the days they do go to work, they have much longer days, sometimes several hours longer(12+).
As for furloughs at a university, everyone suffers. Enrollments are restricted, classes and being cut and fees are being raised. At some state schools, faculty are being told to cut a certain number of work days out of their schedule, yet they are being asked not to take more than 10% time off from their contact hours. That means a significant reduction in other aspects of the course such as grading papers. Most faculty I know would find it difficult to reduce non-teaching hours and still maintain the same standards of education. So it becomes a choice between following the furlough requirements and letting the quality of education suffer, or saying to !bleep! with it and just accepting less money for more work (elimination of certain courses means existing ones are more crowded). It's a complete joke.
on Sep 25, 2009 at 9:55 am
Anonymous has described the situation at the universities quite well. In addition to the enforced furlough days, there was an incentive program at the UCs that encouraged people to leave, not all of them nearing retirement age. A fairly significant number of staff took this option, when faced with the pay cuts that were coming. So now there are far fewer staff, the same amount of work, and forced furlough days, with the staff remaining having to pick up all of the work from those who departed and still try to fulfill the universities' mission statements of serving the students and providing the framework and support for a quality education. At the same time as this crunch/crisis is unfolding, the regents quietly voted for pay raises for some top administrators, and this is in large part what yesterday's protest was about.