Town Square

Why can't pleasantonparceltaxinfo add or subtract?

Original post made by Still waiting, Another Pleasanton neighborhood, on May 29, 2009

They have a headline called "BREAKING NEWS - Federal Stimulus to Avert Cuts" but fail to mention the additional $6.8 - $9 million in state cuts to Pleasanton Unified added to the original March $9.7 million in cuts. A $16.5 - $18.7 million deficit when compared to $8.1 million potential federal stimulus money is a really big number to kinda forget about.

This story contains 510 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.


Like this comment
Posted by Jill
a resident of Birdland
on May 29, 2009 at 6:56 pm

I hope Measure G passes even though I am against it because I want to hear the whining and crying when the teachers get their raises and your precious programs still get cut. Then what will you do, go crying to Mayor Moonbeam? Lotsaluck, becuase you can't come back to the property owners again!

Like this comment
Posted by Stacey
a resident of Amberwood/Wood Meadows
on May 29, 2009 at 7:09 pm

Stacey is a registered user.

I'm just wondering what impact this "news" has on what the District is going to do in light of these new cuts. Whether Measure G passes or not, they (and the unions) still have some hard decisions to make. All the Federal funding does is put us back at square one, where we were back in February. CA can't cut below 2006 funding levels without risking the Federal funds so now we have a good starting point, the 2006 budget. It seems to me though that the District is unprepared for any level of cuts, since the Board abandoned the goal of a 7% reserve back in 2006 and then authorized the hiring of more counselors without identifying a funding source.

Like this comment
Posted by Pleasanton Parent
a resident of Pleasanton Meadows
on May 29, 2009 at 7:19 pm

Still Waiting -

"And they continue to claim that step and column accounts for a full $15 million in labor costs (so called "guaranteed raises") over the next four years even though the current contract expires at the end of the year. A poor assumption since the financial climate has changed dramatically since the last contract was adopted"

Considering there have been no guarantees that S&C increases will be frozen (whether measure G passes or not) I think it is actually a poor assumption to think that they would be frozen / re-negotiated.

Like this comment
Posted by Fed up
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 29, 2009 at 7:24 pm

The pro-G people are very busy trying to prevent anyone from realizing what you've just said Stacey.
I'm tired of the flyers and ads and "it's for the kids" rallies. What a waste of resources and time.
The bottom line is everyone has had to cut back on their spending and the school district isn't any different. It's reality.
The school district have a very "let them eat cake" attitude towards the taxpayers. I'm fed up with that attitude.
My NO vote is a no to the administration. Let them give up their perks before coming to the voters or asking teachers to take pay cuts.

Like this comment
Posted by No on G
a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood
on May 29, 2009 at 9:24 pm

Still waiting,

In the interest of full disclosure, or as the you reminded everyone from the PPTI website "Breaking News", I am wondering why the district, you know, the One responsible for the info to the community, hasn't listed the 1.5MM annually compounded (because raises one year are the new base and 1.5 is added each year in addition to the "new" base...) funds owed to the teachers???

How come the district has shared its need to maintain a "general fund" with no strings attached? Or is that "clouding the issue also"? I mean, we wouldn't want to get mixed up in the facts!

You also stated that "Our district is in this condition because this is a period of unprecedented financial assault against public education in California."

Are you SURE you want to go there? Are you SURE the district didn't...oh, I don't know...perhaps...went back on their reserve to give out "unprecedented" raises of 14.5% to the teachers AS WELL as sneak administrative raises a year ago when the state was facing it's looming budget woahs.

Or is that unfair of me to bring up facts again about the fiscal mismanagement at the district?

Perhaps Dr. Casey is being victimized by the State! Perhaps not.

You said one thing very well in this article, and I assert it is just one of the many great ideas this community is coming up with...

"Where else shall cuts be made? What's next? My guess is the schools themselves. I believe that's where the math takes us. Soon"

That is wholly accurate and it will as soon as this measure G fails.

I suppose for you the situation appears more desperate because the deficit is getting larger. See, those of us on this side believe that that is the point. There is a point where money is no longer the solution. Unsustainable raises and diminishing property values do correlate - people will not continue to pay well over a thousand dollars a year (average if Measure G is added to Measures A and B from 1997), and we risk losing our tax base altogher.

Keep on believing the lie that more money equals better education. Since you are so interested in up to date facts, please explain where you derive that fact.


And....(drum roll, please...)


Like this comment
Posted by YES ON G
a resident of another community
on May 29, 2009 at 9:26 pm


We have to come together as a community and stop all this bickering. Let's make sure our schools stay good!

Like this comment
Posted by Pleasanton Parent
a resident of Pleasanton Meadows
on May 29, 2009 at 9:35 pm

Yes On G -

I couldn't agree more, we need to find a fiscally responsible, ethically sound, and equitable solution to the problems our schools face. This solution should focus on the kids and balance the needs of the faculity, administration, and community.

Its too bad Measure G fails to deliver on any of that.