Support local journalism!
Help preserve local news coverage in print and online.
Become a member now!

Login | Register
Sign up for eBulletins
Click for Pleasanton, California Forecast

TownSquare Forum
(Postings listed from most recent to oldest)
View in an RSS Reader
Choose category to Display:
  ALL CATEGORIES   AROUND TOWN   BOOKS & MOVIES   COMMENTS ON STORIES
  CRIMES & INCIDENTS   RESTAURANTS   SCHOOLS & KIDS   SPORTS
  STATE, NATIONAL, INTERNATIONAL   EDITOR'S BLOG   LOL (LESSONS ON LAUGHTER)   PUBLISHER'S BLOG
  REPORTER'S BLOG TIM HUNT

POST A NEW TOPIC GO TO MAIN VIEW RETURN TO HOME PAGE  
Bookmark and Share
The court got one right
Tim Hunt, posted by Tim Hunt, a resident of the Castlewood neighborhood, on Jul 4, 2012 at 9:37 am
Tim Hunt is a member (registered user) of PleasantonWeekly.com

As we celebrate our nation’s independence today, I have been reflecting on one of the less publicized Supreme Court decision during a momentous week in Washington D.C.

The court found Obamacare constitutional through Chief Justice John Roberts’ creative thinking as well as declaring three provisions of Arizona’s immigration law unconstitutional.

The third ruling hinged on what determines free speech under the First Amendment. The court, by a 6-3 vote that included liberal and conservative justices, upheld the liberal-dominated Ninth Circuit Court decision that ruled the Stolen Valor Act unconstitutional.

The act made it a crime to falsely claim to have earned military honors and was passed by Congress and signed by President George W. Bush in 2006. The Supreme Court case stemmed from a blatant lie told by a water district board member in Southern California who claimed to have a Medal of Honor.

Certainly, the actions of this clown were insulting or worse to decorated members of the United States Armed Services. The issue with this law that the court majority opinion centered on was whether the government should be in the business of determining truth or falsehood.

It’s tempting to say YES—PLEASE—let’s hold all of those politicians responsible for their speech on the campaign trail or from the Rose Garden. Fortunately, the framers of our constitution and the Bill of Rights understood the dangers of such an approach for citizens as well as the politicians. The government or the legal system doesn’t belong adjudicating these matters as criminal cases.

Because veterans and those currently serving are now so respected (a welcome change from the Viet Nam days) and appropriately honored, Congress could not avoid the temptation to establish a special version of crime.

It’s way too similar to the so-called “hate crimes” that proscribe special treatment for violations against sub-groups of society that are different than those given for people deemed non-special. These provide prosecutors with tools they should not need or use—if a crime has been committed, it should not matter the race or gender of the victim.

As the Declaration of Independence reads, “All men are created equal” and thus should be treated that way under the law.

This case called out veterans and service members to whom we all owe a debt of gratitude. Their sacrifices help preserve the liberties we should all treasure, but that should not create a difference class of people. They rightfully deserve and should receive all of the benefits that the government promises them—something that the Veteran’s Administration has been coming up way short in providing.

The court majority got this one right.


Add a comment | Add a new topic
If you were a member and logged in you could track this topic

Comments
There are no comments yet for this post.
Be the first!

Comments on this topic have been limited to registered users who are logged in.

If you are a registered user, login here.
If not, registration is very simple and may be done here.
 

PleasantonWeekly.com ©2013 Embarcadero Media.
All rights reserved.